Re: pfsync between 8.4 and 9.2

2013-10-07 Thread Gleb Smirnoff
On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 12:33:09PM +0100, Pete French wrote: P> Just to follow this up for anyuone finding the thread, after upgrading P> the other firewall to 9.2 as well, pfsync works fine agai. The failover P> actually seems a lot faster in fact, so it looks like a big improvements. Btw, pfsync

Re: pfsync between 8.4 and 9.2

2013-10-02 Thread Pete French
Just to follow this up for anyuone finding the thread, after upgrading the other firewall to 9.2 as well, pfsync works fine agai. The failover actually seems a lot faster in fact, so it looks like a big improvements. thanks, -pete. ___ freebsd-stable@fr

Re: pfsync between 8.4 and 9.2

2013-10-02 Thread Pete French
> Warning: I don't know internals, I'm just a user. but one who reads the doucmebtation closer than I do apparently :-) > According to pf(4), FreeBSD 9.2 matches OpenBSD 4.5. > Specifically, pfsync(4) says: > > The pfsync protocol and kernel implementation were > significantly modified betwee

Re: pfsync between 8.4 and 9.2

2013-10-01 Thread kron
On 2013/10/01 21:47, Pete French wrote: > I just started rolling out 9.2 to all our production machnes, which > are currently on 8.4. We have tested it pretty throughly internally > and are very happy with it, but as part of the deployment have hit > a problem. We have a pair of boxes running as a

pfsync between 8.4 and 9.2

2013-10-01 Thread Pete French
I just started rolling out 9.2 to all our production machnes, which are currently on 8.4. We have tested it pretty throughly internally and are very happy with it, but as part of the deployment have hit a problem. We have a pair of boxes running as a firewall using carp and pfsync. One of the - the