Re: make release vs. installworld

2006-09-26 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 10:18:05AM +0200, Ulrich Spoerlein wrote: >On 9/26/06, Ruslan Ermilov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 09:30:25AM +0200, Ulrich Spoerlein wrote: > [...] > > So, what's the recommended way to a) build own releases > > > Foll

Re: make release vs. installworld

2006-09-26 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 09:30:25AM +0200, Ulrich Spoerlein wrote: [...] > So, what's the recommended way to a) build own releases > Follow the release(7) manpage instructions. > and b) update your servers with it. > You can use shell-script type of installation to do binary upgrades, .../R/stage

Re: make release vs. installworld

2006-09-26 Thread Joseph Koshy
I am building my own releases for FreeBSD. When upgrading a server to the new release, I'd like to use the 'make installworld' procedure. Therefore I'm mounting the /usr/src and /usr/obj from the release build via NFS onto the server in question. Are you running "make buildworld" on one host and

make release vs. installworld

2006-09-26 Thread Ulrich Spoerlein
Hi all, I am building my own releases for FreeBSD. When upgrading a server to the new release, I'd like to use the 'make installworld' procedure. Therefore I'm mounting the /usr/src and /usr/obj from the release build via NFS onto the server in question. However, installworld will fail, as it lo