On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 08:55:56AM -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> For those who missed it, this is a problem in the Linux emulation. See
> the announcement from the the FreeBSD Security Officer. for details,
> but the recent security patch triggered the problem by adding check
> for the _UN data st
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 6:13 AM, Alexander Leidinger
wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Oct 2011 15:43:41 +0900 Chung-Yeol Lee
> wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 4:32 AM, Ted Faber wrote:
>> >
>> > On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 09:21:12PM +0200, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
>> > > On Thu, 29 Sep 2011 16:13:50 -0700 Te
On Mon, 3 Oct 2011 15:43:41 +0900 Chung-Yeol Lee
wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 4:32 AM, Ted Faber wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 09:21:12PM +0200, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> > > On Thu, 29 Sep 2011 16:13:50 -0700 Ted Faber
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > (process:52979): Gtk-WARNING **:
On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 4:32 AM, Ted Faber wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 09:21:12PM +0200, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> > On Thu, 29 Sep 2011 16:13:50 -0700 Ted Faber wrote:
> >
> > > (process:52979): Gtk-WARNING **: Locale not supported by C library.
> > > Using the fallback 'C' locale.
On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 12:32:10 -0700 Ted Faber wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 09:21:12PM +0200, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> > On Thu, 29 Sep 2011 16:13:50 -0700 Ted Faber wrote:
> >
> > > (process:52979): Gtk-WARNING **: Locale not supported by C
> > > library. Using the fallback 'C' locale.
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 09:21:12PM +0200, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Sep 2011 16:13:50 -0700 Ted Faber wrote:
>
> > (process:52979): Gtk-WARNING **: Locale not supported by C library.
> > Using the fallback 'C' locale.
>
> I would expect something like this if you use a valid Fr
On Thu, 29 Sep 2011 16:13:50 -0700 Ted Faber wrote:
> (process:52979): Gtk-WARNING **: Locale not supported by C library.
> Using the fallback 'C' locale.
I would expect something like this if you use a valid FreeBSD locale
specification which is not valid on Linux. For example on FreeBSD
oss upgrades.
>>>>>
>>>>> Hope this helps. Let us know how it turns out.
>>>> Actually, now that I think of it, I think the way I did it was this:
>>>>
>>>> cd /home/conrads/.mozilla/plugins
>>>>
>>>> /usr/lo
e it has something to do with the fact
>>>> that it's not a native plugin(?). I don't know, really. But this
>>>> has worked fine for me ever since, even across upgrades.
>>>>
>>>> Hope this helps. Let us know how it turns out.
On 09/29/11 18:30, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 11:56:48PM +0200, Norbert Augenstein wrote:
[ .. snip .. ]
it seems that
http://security.freebsd.org/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-11:05.unix.asc
is the culprit.
Just for clarification:
Said fix might explain the "ERROR: failed to
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 10:06 PM, Alexander Leidinger
wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Sep 2011 12:50:01 -0700 Ted Faber wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 02:41:39PM -0400, Michael Butler wrote:
>> > On 09/29/11 13:57, Norbert Augenstein wrote:
>> > > On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 10:08:25PM +0400, S.N.Grigoriev
On Thursday 29 September 2011 04:06 pm, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Sep 2011 12:50:01 -0700 Ted Faber wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 02:41:39PM -0400, Michael Butler wrote:
> > > On 09/29/11 13:57, Norbert Augenstein wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 10:08:25PM +0400, S.N.Grig
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 03:01:44PM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 02:40:09PM -0700, Ted Faber wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 01:05:40PM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> > > On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 12:50:01PM -0700, Ted Faber wrote:
> > > > (npviewer.bin:5430): GL
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 11:56:48PM +0200, Norbert Augenstein wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Sep 2011 22:06:59 +0200
> Alexander Leidinger wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 29 Sep 2011 12:50:01 -0700 Ted Faber wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 02:41:39PM -0400, Michael Butler wrote:
> > > > On 09/29/11 13:57, No
On Thu, 29 Sep 2011 22:06:59 +0200
Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Sep 2011 12:50:01 -0700 Ted Faber wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 02:41:39PM -0400, Michael Butler wrote:
> > > On 09/29/11 13:57, Norbert Augenstein wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 10:08:25PM +0400, S.N.Grig
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 02:40:09PM -0700, Ted Faber wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 01:05:40PM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 12:50:01PM -0700, Ted Faber wrote:
> > > (npviewer.bin:5430): GLib-WARNING **: getpwuid_r(): failed due
> > > to unknown user id (2139)
> > >
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 02:31:59PM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> > I can grab new sources and reinstall if you think it's worth it.
>
> Did you rebuild ports (particularly glib, which appears to be what's
> spitting out the getpwuid_r() error) after you did this?
I've rebuilt firefox and glib,
gt;> >>> On Wed, 28 Sep 2011 11:50:08 -0500
>> >>> "Conrad J. Sabatier" wrote:
>>
>> [ .. snip .. ]
>>
>> >>>
>> >>> Actually, now that I think of it, I think the way I did it was this:
>> >>>
>>
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 01:05:40PM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 12:50:01PM -0700, Ted Faber wrote:
> >
> > (process:5430): Gtk-WARNING **: Locale not supported by C library.
> > Using the fallback 'C' locale.
>
> This would indicate you're messing with LANG, LC_*, o
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 02:16:50PM -0700, Ted Faber wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 10:06:59PM +0200, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> > On Thu, 29 Sep 2011 12:50:01 -0700 Ted Faber wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 02:41:39PM -0400, Michael Butler wrote:
> > > > On 09/29/11 13:57, Norbert Au
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 10:06:59PM +0200, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Sep 2011 12:50:01 -0700 Ted Faber wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 02:41:39PM -0400, Michael Butler wrote:
> > > On 09/29/11 13:57, Norbert Augenstein wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 10:08:25PM +0400, S.N
this
>>> has worked fine for me ever since, even across upgrades.
>>>
>>> Hope this helps. Let us know how it turns out.
>>
>> Actually, now that I think of it, I think the way I did it was this:
>>
>> cd /home/conrads/.mozilla/plugins
>>
did it was this:
> > >>>
> > >>> cd /home/conrads/.mozilla/plugins
> > >>>
> > >>> /usr/local/lib/nspluginwrapper/x86_64/freebsd/npconfig
> > >>> -i /usr/local/lib/npapi/linux-f10-flashplugin/libflashplayer.so
> > >
On Thu, 29 Sep 2011 12:50:01 -0700 Ted Faber wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 02:41:39PM -0400, Michael Butler wrote:
> > On 09/29/11 13:57, Norbert Augenstein wrote:
> > > On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 10:08:25PM +0400, S.N.Grigoriev wrote:
> > >> 28.09.2011, 21:10, "Conrad J. Sabatier":
> > >>> On We
-0500
> >>> "Conrad J. Sabatier" wrote:
>
> [ .. snip .. ]
>
> >>>
> >>> Actually, now that I think of it, I think the way I did it was this:
> >>>
> >>> cd /home/conrads/.mozilla/plugins
> >>>
ink the way I did it was this:
cd /home/conrads/.mozilla/plugins
/usr/local/lib/nspluginwrapper/x86_64/freebsd/npconfig
-i /usr/local/lib/npapi/linux-f10-flashplugin/libflashplayer.so
And npwrapper.libflashplayer.so was created
under /home/conrads/.mozilla/plugins.
Hope this helps.
I
th the fact
> >> that it's not a native plugin(?). I don't know, really. But this
> >> has worked fine for me ever since, even across upgrades.
> >>
> >> Hope this helps. Let us know how it turns out.
> >
> > Actually, now that I think o
across upgrades.
>>
>> Hope this helps. Let us know how it turns out.
>
> Actually, now that I think of it, I think the way I did it was this:
>
> cd /home/conrads/.mozilla/plugins
>
> /usr/local/lib/nspluginwrapper/x86_64/freebsd/npconfig
> -i /usr/local/lib/npa
At Wed, 28 Sep 2011 16:59:39 +0200,
Thomas Steen Rasmussen wrote:
> Please see
> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-gecko/2011-September/001840.html
That post is not the case for the OP:
- peculiar to firefox-7 implementation. He runs chromium.
- wrapped linux-f10-flashplugin in
e way I did it was this:
cd /home/conrads/.mozilla/plugins
/usr/local/lib/nspluginwrapper/x86_64/freebsd/npconfig
-i /usr/local/lib/npapi/linux-f10-flashplugin/libflashplayer.so
And npwrapper.libflashplayer.so was created
under /home/conrads/.mozilla/p
On Wed, 28 Sep 2011 19:59:43 +0400
"S.N.Grigoriev" wrote:
>
> Hi Conrad,
>
> after manual reinstalling as described above 'npconfig -l' output is:
>
> /usr/local/lib/browser_plugins/npwrapper.libflashplayer.so
> Original
> plugin: /usr/local/lib/n
owing conditions are met:
>> linprocfs is mounted on /usr/compat/linux/proc,
>> there is a softlink from /usr/local/lib/browser_plugins/ pointing to
>> /usr/local/lib/npapi/linux-f10-flashplugin/libflashplayer.so,
>> ~/.mozilla/plugins/npwrapper.libflashplayer.so is created
. After that both firefox and
>> chromium do not see linux-f10-flashplugin. I reinstalled manually
>> emulators/linux_base-f10, www/nspluginwrapper and
>> www/linux-f10-flashplugin10 and did other actions as described in the
>> chapter 6.2.3 of the FreeBSD Handbook. The fol
On Wed, 28 Sep 2011 18:25:17 +0400
"S.N.Grigoriev" wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I upgraded today kernel and world from fresh sources on my 8-stable
> amd64 system. I upgraded ports as well. After that both firefox and
> chromium do not see linux-f10-flashplugin. I reinsta
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 10:25 AM, S.N.Grigoriev
wrote:
> All browsers still treat the flash plugin as missing.
> What may be wrong?
try nspluginwrapper -v -a -u
--
Eitan Adler
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailm
On 28.09.2011 16:25, S.N.Grigoriev wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I upgraded today kernel and world from fresh sources on my 8-stable amd64
> system.
> I upgraded ports as well. After that both firefox and chromium do not see
> linux-f10-flashplugin.
> I reinstalled manually emu
Hi list,
I upgraded today kernel and world from fresh sources on my 8-stable amd64
system.
I upgraded ports as well. After that both firefox and chromium do not see
linux-f10-flashplugin.
I reinstalled manually emulators/linux_base-f10, www/nspluginwrapper and
www/linux-f10-flashplugin10 and
37 matches
Mail list logo