On Friday 11 November 2005 07:23, Jan Grant wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Nov 2005, Michael C. Shultz wrote:
> > > > One last thing, if you make a script that does the conversion, might
> > > > I have a copy? Here is how I'll set up pm-020.conf to work:
> > >
> > > Surely. pkgtools.conf is actually a ruby s
On Friday 11 November 2005 09:04, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
> "Michael C. Shultz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Friday 11 November 2005 08:32, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
> > > "Michael C. Shultz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > > Works good, just one thing, portmanager has no dependencies, like to
>
On Friday 11 November 2005 08:32, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
> "Michael C. Shultz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Works good, just one thing, portmanager has no dependencies, like to keep
> > it that way.
>
> It's not necessary to consider that an issue: this functionality is
> really only useful to so
"Michael C. Shultz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Works good, just one thing, portmanager has no dependencies, like to keep it
> that way.
It's not necessary to consider that an issue: this functionality is
really only useful to someone who has had portupgrade installed
anyway.
__
On Friday 11 November 2005 07:29, Michael C. Shultz wrote:
> On Friday 11 November 2005 07:23, Jan Grant wrote:
> > On Fri, 11 Nov 2005, Michael C. Shultz wrote:
> > > > > One last thing, if you make a script that does the conversion,
> > > > > might I have a copy? Here is how I'll set up pm-020.c
On Friday 11 November 2005 07:23, Jan Grant wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Nov 2005, Michael C. Shultz wrote:
> > > > One last thing, if you make a script that does the conversion, might
> > > > I have a copy? Here is how I'll set up pm-020.conf to work:
> > >
> > > Surely. pkgtools.conf is actually a ruby s
On Fri, 11 Nov 2005, Michael C. Shultz wrote:
> > > One last thing, if you make a script that does the conversion, might I
> > > have a copy? Here is how I'll set up pm-020.conf to work:
> >
> > Surely. pkgtools.conf is actually a ruby script: I've no idea how
> > dynamically the rules are evalua
On Friday 11 November 2005 06:26, Jan Grant wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Nov 2005, Michael C. Shultz wrote:
> > On Friday 11 November 2005 05:58, Michael C. Shultz wrote:
> > > On Friday 11 November 2005 05:58, Jan Grant wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 11 Nov 2005, Michael C. Shultz wrote:
> > > >
> > > > [on wildca
On Fri, 11 Nov 2005, Michael C. Shultz wrote:
> On Friday 11 November 2005 05:58, Michael C. Shultz wrote:
> > On Friday 11 November 2005 05:58, Jan Grant wrote:
> > > On Fri, 11 Nov 2005, Michael C. Shultz wrote:
> > >
> > > [on wildcards in portmanager rules]
> > >
> > > > Silly me, I get it now
On Friday 11 November 2005 05:58, Michael C. Shultz wrote:
> On Friday 11 November 2005 05:58, Jan Grant wrote:
> > On Fri, 11 Nov 2005, Michael C. Shultz wrote:
> >
> > [on wildcards in portmanager rules]
> >
> > > Silly me, I get it now. Not supported yet but I like the idea so am
> > > adding it
On Friday 11 November 2005 05:58, Jan Grant wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Nov 2005, Michael C. Shultz wrote:
>
> [on wildcards in portmanager rules]
>
> > Silly me, I get it now. Not supported yet but I like the idea so am
> > adding it to the things to do list. This one will be near the top.
>
> That's gre
On Fri, 11 Nov 2005, Michael C. Shultz wrote:
[on wildcards in portmanager rules]
> Silly me, I get it now. Not supported yet but I like the idea so am adding it
> to the things to do list. This one will be near the top.
That's great! - especially since that pretty much makes it a mechanical
On Friday 11 November 2005 05:44, Jan Grant wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Nov 2005, Michael C. Shultz wrote:
> > On Friday 11 November 2005 01:43, Jan Grant wrote:
> > > My pkgtools.conf has hundreds(! - busy workstation) of entries along
> > > these lines - some entries apply to several ports, and the portu
On Fri, 11 Nov 2005, Michael C. Shultz wrote:
> On Friday 11 November 2005 01:43, Jan Grant wrote:
> > My pkgtools.conf has hundreds(! - busy workstation) of entries along
> > these lines - some entries apply to several ports, and the portupgrade
> > toolset just basically uses the union of all m
On Friday 11 November 2005 01:43, Jan Grant wrote:
> Hope you don't mind me taking you up on your offer to someone else :-) -
> this is more of a feature request from a portupgrade user who'd like to
> migrate.
>
> On Thu, 10 Nov 2005, Michael C. Shultz wrote:
> > On Thursday 10 November 2005 09:42
On Thursday 10 November 2005 11:32, Paul T. Root wrote:
> Things are running better now. I moved it to a dedicated
> DSL line in my lab, and it's chugging along.
>
> I see an occasional g_vfs_done message fly across. Error 16
> on a read.
> Something like
> g_vfs_done: acd0[READ(offset=81920, leng
ote:
Michael C. Shultz wrote:
***
This message has been scanned by the InterScan for CSC-SSM and found to
be free of known security risks. ***-***
port and install or restart gnome-upgrade.sh
I'm now assuming that since all gnome has been wiped off the
ote:
> >>>***
> >>>This message has been scanned by the InterScan for CSC-SSM and found to
> >>>be free of known security risks. ***-***
> >>
> >>port and install or restart gnome-upgrade.sh
> >>
> >>
On Wednesday 09 November 2005 18:26, Paul Root wrote:
> Michael C. Shultz wrote:
> > ***
> > This message has been scanned by the InterScan for CSC-SSM and found to
> > be free of known security risks. ***-***
>
> port and install
On Wednesday 09 November 2005 14:41, Alistair wrote:
> Michael C. Shultz wrote:
> >On Wednesday 09 November 2005 13:46, Paul T. Root wrote:
> >>This script is one of the most frustrating things ever
> >>written.
> >>
> >>[Snip]
> >
> >As an
Michael C. Shultz wrote:
On Wednesday 09 November 2005 13:46, Paul T. Root wrote:
This script is one of the most frustrating things ever
written.
[Snip]
As an alternative to gnome-upgrade.sh you may want to consider
using sysutils/portmanager, all you need do is run
portmanager x11
o works.
>
> Now, since gnome 2.12 is out, I want to upgrade to that.
> Seems resonable.
>
> http://www.freebsd.org/gnome tells us not to use portupgrade
> to upgrade gnome2. The upgrades get out of order.
>
> Ok fine, use gnome-upgrade.sh. And keep trying it says.
>
> I
http://www.freebsd.org/gnome tells us not to use portupgrade
to upgrade gnome2. The upgrades get out of order.
Ok fine, use gnome-upgrade.sh. And keep trying it says.
I've run it better than a dozen times, now. It's still trying.
All day, I turn and look at it periodically, resolve what
23 matches
Mail list logo
