Re: ZFS and df weirdness

2009-07-04 Thread Christian Walther
Hi Dan, basically the "size" in df shows the current free space plus the used space of the specific filesystem. This makes sense: Since per default all disk space is shared, and thus can be used by all filesystems, all filesystems need to report it as free space. Well, and used space has to be add

Re: ZFS and df weirdness

2009-07-04 Thread Dan Naumov
On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 2:26 AM, Freddie Cash wrote: > > > On Sat, Jul 4, 2009 at 2:55 PM, Dan Naumov wrote: >> >> Hello list. >> >> I have a single 2tb disk used on a 7.2-release/amd64 system with a >> small part of it given to UFS and most of the disk given to a single >> "simple" zfs pool with s

Re: ZFS and df weirdness

2009-07-04 Thread Freddie Cash
On Sat, Jul 4, 2009 at 2:55 PM, Dan Naumov wrote: > Hello list. > > I have a single 2tb disk used on a 7.2-release/amd64 system with a > small part of it given to UFS and most of the disk given to a single > "simple" zfs pool with several filesystems without redundancy. I've > noticed a really we

ZFS and df weirdness

2009-07-04 Thread Dan Naumov
Hello list. I have a single 2tb disk used on a 7.2-release/amd64 system with a small part of it given to UFS and most of the disk given to a single "simple" zfs pool with several filesystems without redundancy. I've noticed a really weird thing regarding what "df" reports regarding the "total spac