Small note, as I wasn't thinking this far back when I wrote this..
I tracked stable since 3.3-RELEASE on a K6-2 333 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]), and never
had such problems. Same good cooling - big fan/heatsink and conducting
grease.
On Mon, 2 Oct 2000, Jeff Wyman wrote:
> Just a little side note, alth
Just a little side note, although enough info might have been given out
already...
I have a K6-2/500 system (actually a 550@6x83) running at 2.2v core. It
runs very fast and has tracked stable for a few months now, building about
every week or so. I decided as of 4.1.1-R to stop this wasting of t
On Sun, 1 Oct 2000, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
> >
> > Something is wrong with your system, check cabling, cooling and memory.
>
> I would change that to check, in order, cooling, cpu voltage setting,
> memory and memory timing, power supply, and finally cabling.
>
> If you have one of the rare 2
On Sun, 1 Oct 2000, Mike Smith wrote:
>> I just compiled Gimp on the same system without any hitches. Other
>> programs as well. I also ran memory tests and verified the
>> motherboard's temperature via the BIOS and visually checked the fans.
In response, I have checked as well. All three of
> I just compiled Gimp on the same system without any hitches. Other
> programs as well. I also ran memory tests and verified the
> motherboard's temperature via the BIOS and visually checked the fans.
>
> It's my belief that within the last three weeks new code was inserted
> into STABLE that
I just compiled Gimp on the same system without any hitches. Other
programs as well. I also ran memory tests and verified the
motherboard's temperature via the BIOS and visually checked the fans.
It's my belief that within the last three weeks new code was inserted
into STABLE that was never fu
