Re: sendmail replacement

2010-01-24 Thread Svein Skogen (Listmail Account)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 13.01.2010 11:52, S.N.Grigoriev wrote: > Hi list, > > I would like to know if there is a way to completely > replace the base sendmail with a ports one. The goal > is to have corresponding files on the traditional places > (not in /usr/local) and t

Re: Re: sendmail replacement

2010-01-13 Thread S . N . Grigoriev
13.01.10, 14:59, "Matthew Seaman" : > > absolute paths may be used not ony to start sendmail program but, > > for example, to automatically build .mc files from .m4 files in > > /usr/share/sendmail/cf directory. For port sendmail it becomes > > /usr/local/share/sendmail/cf > > Unless you

Re: sendmail replacement

2010-01-13 Thread Matthew Seaman
S.N.Grigoriev wrote: 13.01.10, 14:29, "Miroslav Lachman" <000.f...@quip.cz>: S.N.Grigoriev wrote: [...] > I thank you for your response. All you wrote is quite right. > But it is a general rule not to use in the system two sets > of slightly different programs with duplicating names.

Re: Re: sendmail replacement

2010-01-13 Thread S . N . Grigoriev
13.01.10, 14:29, "Miroslav Lachman" <000.f...@quip.cz>: > S.N.Grigoriev wrote: > > [...] > > > I thank you for your response. All you wrote is quite right. > > But it is a general rule not to use in the system two sets > > of slightly different programs with duplicating names. It is > >

Re: sendmail replacement

2010-01-13 Thread Miroslav Lachman
S.N.Grigoriev wrote: [...] I thank you for your response. All you wrote is quite right. But it is a general rule not to use in the system two sets of slightly different programs with duplicating names. It is a direct way to have problems. For example, all third party scripts should be revised

Re: Re: sendmail replacement

2010-01-13 Thread jhell
On Wed, 13 Jan 2010 07:44, serguey-grigoriev@ wrote: 13.01.10, 11:32, "Matthew Seaman" : S.N.Grigoriev wrote: > I would like to know if there is a way to completely > replace the base sendmail with a ports one. The goal > is to have corresponding files on the traditional places > (not in /u

Re: Re: sendmail replacement

2010-01-13 Thread S . N . Grigoriev
13.01.10, 11:32, "Matthew Seaman" : > S.N.Grigoriev wrote: > > > I would like to know if there is a way to completely > > replace the base sendmail with a ports one. The goal > > is to have corresponding files on the traditional places > > (not in /usr/local) and to use the system sendmail

Re: sendmail replacement

2010-01-13 Thread Claus Guttesen
> I would like to know if there is a way to completely > replace the base sendmail with a ports one. The goal > is to have corresponding files on the traditional places > (not in /usr/local) and to use the system sendmail > startup script but not /usr/local/etc/rc.d/sendmail.sh. postfix? Very nice

Re: sendmail replacement

2010-01-13 Thread Matthew Seaman
S.N.Grigoriev wrote: I would like to know if there is a way to completely replace the base sendmail with a ports one. The goal is to have corresponding files on the traditional places (not in /usr/local) and to use the system sendmail startup script but not /usr/local/etc/rc.d/sendmail.sh. Tha