-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 13.01.2010 11:52, S.N.Grigoriev wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I would like to know if there is a way to completely
> replace the base sendmail with a ports one. The goal
> is to have corresponding files on the traditional places
> (not in /usr/local) and t
13.01.10, 14:59, "Matthew Seaman" :
> > absolute paths may be used not ony to start sendmail program but,
> > for example, to automatically build .mc files from .m4 files in
> > /usr/share/sendmail/cf directory. For port sendmail it becomes
> > /usr/local/share/sendmail/cf
>
> Unless you
S.N.Grigoriev wrote:
13.01.10, 14:29, "Miroslav Lachman" <000.f...@quip.cz>:
S.N.Grigoriev wrote:
[...]
> I thank you for your response. All you wrote is quite right.
> But it is a general rule not to use in the system two sets
> of slightly different programs with duplicating names.
13.01.10, 14:29, "Miroslav Lachman" <000.f...@quip.cz>:
> S.N.Grigoriev wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > I thank you for your response. All you wrote is quite right.
> > But it is a general rule not to use in the system two sets
> > of slightly different programs with duplicating names. It is
> >
S.N.Grigoriev wrote:
[...]
I thank you for your response. All you wrote is quite right.
But it is a general rule not to use in the system two sets
of slightly different programs with duplicating names. It is
a direct way to have problems.
For example, all third party scripts should be revised
On Wed, 13 Jan 2010 07:44, serguey-grigoriev@ wrote:
13.01.10, 11:32, "Matthew Seaman" :
S.N.Grigoriev wrote:
> I would like to know if there is a way to completely
> replace the base sendmail with a ports one. The goal
> is to have corresponding files on the traditional places
> (not in /u
13.01.10, 11:32, "Matthew Seaman" :
> S.N.Grigoriev wrote:
>
> > I would like to know if there is a way to completely
> > replace the base sendmail with a ports one. The goal
> > is to have corresponding files on the traditional places
> > (not in /usr/local) and to use the system sendmail
> I would like to know if there is a way to completely
> replace the base sendmail with a ports one. The goal
> is to have corresponding files on the traditional places
> (not in /usr/local) and to use the system sendmail
> startup script but not /usr/local/etc/rc.d/sendmail.sh.
postfix? Very nice
S.N.Grigoriev wrote:
I would like to know if there is a way to completely
replace the base sendmail with a ports one. The goal
is to have corresponding files on the traditional places
(not in /usr/local) and to use the system sendmail
startup script but not /usr/local/etc/rc.d/sendmail.sh.
Tha