Re: my build time impact of clang 5.0

2017-10-09 Thread Boris Samorodov
04.10.2017 15:26, Matt Smith пишет: On Oct 04 13:03, krad wrote: have you tried meta builds and pkgbase? I was going to say this. Because my build times have increased so massively on my underpowered server I've switched to doing incremental builds. Set WITH_META_MODE=yes in /etc/src-env.con

Re: my build time impact of clang 5.0

2017-10-04 Thread Matt Smith
On Oct 04 13:03, krad wrote: have you tried meta builds and pkgbase? I was going to say this. Because my build times have increased so massively on my underpowered server I've switched to doing incremental builds. Set WITH_META_MODE=yes in /etc/src-env.conf and add kld_list="filemon" to /etc

Re: my build time impact of clang 5.0

2017-10-04 Thread krad
have you tried meta builds and pkgbase? On 3 October 2017 at 16:38, Dan Mack wrote: > Jakub Lach writes: > > > On the other hand, I'm having tremendous increases in Unixbench scores > > comparing to > > 11-STABLE in the April (same machine, clang 4 then, clang 5 now) (about > > 40%). > > > > I

Re: my build time impact of clang 5.0

2017-10-03 Thread Dan Mack
Andy Farkas writes: > Perhaps you could hack src/tools/tools/whereintheworld/whereintheworld.pl > > -andyf So, I creatd a slightly different build script in perl; kinda works but needs to be optimized: https://github.com/danmack/freebsd-buildtools Basic output looks like with timing on each "

Re: my build time impact of clang 5.0

2017-10-03 Thread Dan Mack
Jakub Lach writes: > On the other hand, I'm having tremendous increases in Unixbench scores > comparing to > 11-STABLE in the April (same machine, clang 4 then, clang 5 now) (about > 40%). > > I have never seen something like that, and I'm running Unixbench on -STABLE > since > 2008. Agree; cla

Re: my build time impact of clang 5.0

2017-10-03 Thread Jakub Lach
On the other hand, I'm having tremendous increases in Unixbench scores comparing to 11-STABLE in the April (same machine, clang 4 then, clang 5 now) (about 40%). I have never seen something like that, and I'm running Unixbench on -STABLE since 2008. -- Sent from: http://freebsd.1045724.x6.nabb

Re: my build time impact of clang 5.0

2017-10-03 Thread Matt Smith
On Oct 03 09:46, Andriy Gapon wrote: On 02/10/2017 21:34, Dan Mack wrote: Another significant change in build times this week - not complaining, just my observations on build times; same server doing buildworld during the various phases of compiler changes over the last year or so FWIW: |-

Re: my build time impact of clang 5.0

2017-10-02 Thread Andriy Gapon
On 02/10/2017 21:34, Dan Mack wrote: > > Another significant change in build times this week - not complaining, > just my observations on build times; same server doing buildworld during > the various phases of compiler changes over the last year or so FWIW: > > |--+--+---

Re: my build time impact of clang 5.0

2017-10-02 Thread Andy Farkas
On 03/10/2017 06:18, Dan Mack wrote: My scripts are pretty coarse grained so I only have timings at the macro build steps so far (buildworld, buildkernel, installkernel, and installworld) I'm going to update them so I can a little more granularity; should be easy to get timings wrapped around t

Re: my build time impact of clang 5.0

2017-10-02 Thread Dan Mack
Mike Tancsa writes: > On 10/2/2017 2:34 PM, Dan Mack wrote: >> >> Another significant change in build times this week - not complaining, >> just my observations on build times; same server doing buildworld during >> the various phases of compiler changes over the last year or so FWIW: > > Kernel

Re: my build time impact of clang 5.0

2017-10-02 Thread Mike Tancsa
On 10/2/2017 2:34 PM, Dan Mack wrote: > > Another significant change in build times this week - not complaining, > just my observations on build times; same server doing buildworld during > the various phases of compiler changes over the last year or so FWIW: Kernel seems to be about the same sin