have you tried meta builds and pkgbase?
On 3 October 2017 at 16:38, Dan Mack <m...@macktronics.com> wrote: > Jakub Lach <jakub_l...@mailplus.pl> writes: > > > On the other hand, I'm having tremendous increases in Unixbench scores > > comparing to > > 11-STABLE in the April (same machine, clang 4 then, clang 5 now) (about > > 40%). > > > > I have never seen something like that, and I'm running Unixbench on > -STABLE > > since > > 2008. > > Agree; clang/llvm and friends have added a lot of value. It's worth it > I think. > > It is however getting harder to continue with a source based update > model, which I prefer even though most people just use package managers > today. > > I still like to read the commits and understand what's changing, why, > and select the version I am comfortable with given the nuances of my > configuration(s). I think that's why 'knock-on-wood' I've been able to > track mostly CURRENT and/or STABLE without any outages since about 1998 > on production systems :-) > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" > _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
