Re: jail: external and localhost distinction

2009-02-07 Thread Robert Watson
On Sat, 7 Feb 2009, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote: On Fri, 6 Feb 2009, Robert Watson wrote: RW> > Thank you for clarification, now I see this is actually expected behaviour RW> > :) RW> > RW> > Would then starting second jail with the same root and, say, 127.10.0.1 as RW> > an address be a workaround

Re: jail: external and localhost distinction

2009-02-07 Thread Dmitry Morozovsky
On Fri, 6 Feb 2009, Robert Watson wrote: RW> > Thank you for clarification, now I see this is actually expected behaviour RW> > :) RW> > RW> > Would then starting second jail with the same root and, say, 127.10.0.1 as RW> > an address be a workaround? RW> RW> There's no technical reason you can'

Re: jail: external and localhost distinction

2009-02-06 Thread Robert Watson
On Thu, 29 Jan 2009, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote: Thank you for clarification, now I see this is actually expected behaviour :) Would then starting second jail with the same root and, say, 127.10.0.1 as an address be a workaround? There's no technical reason you can't have more than one jail us

Re: jail: external and localhost distinction

2009-01-29 Thread Dmitry Morozovsky
On Thu, 29 Jan 2009, Robert Watson wrote: RW> > am I right concluding that under FreeBSD jail there is no way to attach RW> > two processes to the same port of external interface address and RW> > localhost? RW> > RW> > I tried to move rather standard two-tier nginx(ip:80)+apache(127.1:80) RW> >

Re: jail: external and localhost distinction

2009-01-29 Thread Robert Watson
On Thu, 29 Jan 2009, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote: am I right concluding that under FreeBSD jail there is no way to attach two processes to the same port of external interface address and localhost? I tried to move rather standard two-tier nginx(ip:80)+apache(127.1:80) scheme into a jail and on ap

Re: jail: external and localhost distinction

2009-01-28 Thread Oliver Fromme
Dmitry Morozovsky wrote: > am I right concluding that under FreeBSD jail there is no way to attach two > processes to the same port of external interface address and localhost? It depends. Do those jailed processes have to communicate with each other, or only with the host system? If they do

Re: jail: external and localhost distinction

2009-01-28 Thread Andrew Snow
Dmitry Morozovsky wrote: am I right concluding that under FreeBSD jail there is no way to attach two processes to the same port of external interface address and localhost? I tried to move rather standard two-tier nginx(ip:80)+apache(127.1:80) scheme into a jail and on apache start got In Fr