On Thu, 29 Jan 2009, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote:
Thank you for clarification, now I see this is actually expected behaviour
:)
Would then starting second jail with the same root and, say, 127.10.0.1 as
an address be a workaround?
There's no technical reason you can't have more than one jail using the same
file system root, and even IP -- you'll find that ps(1) in one jail can't see
processes in the other (and can't signal, etc) but otherwise works as
expected. Of course, any given process has to be a member of at most one of
the two.
Robert N M Watson
Computer Laboratory
University of Cambridge
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
