On Sat, June 1, 2019 09:57, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> 01.06.2019 19:04, Nenhum_de_Nos wrotr:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I replaced a faulty disk from a gmirror some time ago. The array had two
>> 1TB disks and I got one 2TB disk there. Now I replaced the second one
>> and
>> tried to growfs it. No good for me.
>
01.06.2019 19:57, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> 01.06.2019 19:04, Nenhum_de_Nos wrotr:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I replaced a faulty disk from a gmirror some time ago. The array had two
>> 1TB disks and I got one 2TB disk there. Now I replaced the second one and
>> tried to growfs it. No good for me.
>
> First you
01.06.2019 19:04, Nenhum_de_Nos wrotr:
> Hi,
>
> I replaced a faulty disk from a gmirror some time ago. The array had two
> 1TB disks and I got one 2TB disk there. Now I replaced the second one and
> tried to growfs it. No good for me.
First you need to resize the mirror itself with "gmirror resi
Replying to myself again, I again doubled the bio_transient_maxcnt:
original value 160, failed doubling 360, new value 720; and the machine was
able to successfully "for i in jot 10; do make -j4 buildkernel; done" ...
But doesn't this mean that we still have a resource exhaustion to worry
about?
Since there weren't any more ideas here, I tried turning off
hyper-threading. This is an old pentium-D type CPU --- that is: one core
with HT. I'm wondering if the HT nature is helping this resource
exhaustion, so I turned off HT (basically making this a single-threaded
CPU) and it seems to have
The first one (kern.geom.transient_map_retries) causes the system to wedge.
The second one (default is 180, I doubled to 360) causes the system to
crash but not dump.
So... neither fixes the problem.
On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 5:27 AM, Edward Tomasz Napierała
wrote:
> Wiadomość napisana przez Zap
Wiadomość napisana przez Zaphod Beeblebrox w dniu 31 sie
2013, o godz. 00:49:
> Because someone said that there would be no logging of unerlying ATA errors
> without verbose, I rebooted with verbose and tried the same make -j4 again...
> and here is the relatively similar core.txt.5
>
> https:
Because someone said that there would be no logging of unerlying ATA errors
without verbose, I rebooted with verbose and tried the same make -j4
again... and here is the relatively similar core.txt.5
https://uk.eicat.ca/owncloud/public.php?service=files&t=d99648ef5876b91c5957148445e60c87
Looking
My bad. New link for the core.txt.4:
https://uk.eicat.ca/owncloud/public.php?service=files&t=f471e5afae483342cd20dc390e9c2dd7
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 4:51 PM, Ian Lepore wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-08-30 at 21:50 +0200, Edward Tomasz Napierała wrote:
> > Wiadomość napisana przez Zaphod Beeblebrox
On Fri, 2013-08-30 at 21:50 +0200, Edward Tomasz Napierała wrote:
> Wiadomość napisana przez Zaphod Beeblebrox w dniu 29 sie
> 2013, o godz. 23:35:
> > So I have a system running:
> >
> > FreeBSD walk.dclg.ca 9.2-RC3 FreeBSD 9.2-RC3 # r254952: Wed Aug 28 03:02:55
> > EDT 2013 r...@walk.dclg.
Wiadomość napisana przez Zaphod Beeblebrox w dniu 29 sie
2013, o godz. 23:35:
> So I have a system running:
>
> FreeBSD walk.dclg.ca 9.2-RC3 FreeBSD 9.2-RC3 # r254952: Wed Aug 28 03:02:55
> EDT 2013 r...@walk.dclg.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/STRIKE i386
>
> and it has two 2T SATA disks. To ke
I was going to mention that I ran fsck _twice_, but I forgot. Then when
that didn't fix it, I dumped the filesystem, newfs'd it and restored it.
Then I fsck'd it for good measure.
This particular crash immediately follows that treatment.
I can do this in a loop:
boot -> make -j4 buildkernel ->
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 4:35 PM, Zaphod Beeblebrox wrote:
> So I have a system running:
>
> FreeBSD walk.dclg.ca 9.2-RC3 FreeBSD 9.2-RC3 # r254952: Wed Aug 28
> 03:02:55
> EDT 2013 r...@walk.dclg.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/STRIKE i386
>
> and it has two 2T SATA disks. To keep this post short, t
On Thu 2012-01-05 (09:56), Matthew Seaman wrote:
> drive is actually generating errors.) Also try a few passes of
> memtest86 to try and spot problems with RAM.
Yes that was the problem, have gotten rid of a faulty DIMM and
everything is looking a lot saner, thanx :>
_
On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 09:56:02AM +, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> On 04/01/2012 19:43, Gareth de Vaux wrote:
> > Hi all, I've noticed that the md5 hashes of a couple of files on
> > a gmirror change when I recalculate the hashes. The output usually
> > cycles between 2 hashes per file.
> >
> >
On 01/04/12 14:43, Gareth de Vaux wrote:
Hi all, I've noticed that the md5 hashes of a couple of files on
a gmirror change when I recalculate the hashes. The output usually
cycles between 2 hashes per file.
I'm guessing this is because each calculation reads the file
randomly from 1 of 2 compone
On 04/01/2012 19:43, Gareth de Vaux wrote:
> Hi all, I've noticed that the md5 hashes of a couple of files on
> a gmirror change when I recalculate the hashes. The output usually
> cycles between 2 hashes per file.
>
> I'm guessing this is because each calculation reads the file
> randomly f
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 6:35 AM, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 05:31:49PM +0700, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
>> Please explain if such partitioning is supported?
>> physical drive - geom_mirror - geom_journal - geom_part_mbr - geom_part_bsd
>> - journalled UFS2
>
> No. It will on
On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 05:31:49PM +0700, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> Please explain if such partitioning is supported?
> physical drive - geom_mirror - geom_journal - geom_part_mbr - geom_part_bsd -
> journalled UFS2
No. It will only work properly for journaling UFS if UFS is placed
directory on gj
Dear Pawel Jakub,
09.09.2011 12:17, Eugene Grosbein writes:
> Hi!
>
> For long time I experience same UFS2 filesystem problems with several 8.2
> systems
> running on gmirror+gjournal+async. In case of unclean shutdown, kernel panic
> or power failure
> gjournal makes fsck skip its checks and t
Hello, Eugene.
You wrote 9 сентября 2011 г., 13:40:51:
>>> # fsck -t ffs -y /dev/mirror/gm0.journals1e
>> I may be wrong, but I've encountered strong advice not
>> to gjournal whole disk, but make gjournal on per-FS basis, many times.
>> And it seems, that your first create big journal, and sp
09.09.2011 15:21, Lev Serebryakov пишет:
> Hello, Eugene.
> You wrote 9 сентября 2011 г., 9:17:06:
>
>> # fsck -t ffs -y /dev/mirror/gm0.journals1e
> I may be wrong, but I've encountered strong advice not
> to gjournal whole disk, but make gjournal on per-FS basis, many times.
> And it seems,
Hello, Eugene.
You wrote 9 сентября 2011 г., 9:17:06:
> # fsck -t ffs -y /dev/mirror/gm0.journals1e
I may be wrong, but I've encountered strong advice not
to gjournal whole disk, but make gjournal on per-FS basis, many times.
And it seems, that your first create big journal, and splice/partiti
On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 12:45:15PM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 01:55:51PM -0500, Scott Lambert wrote:
> > I have one dual PIII machine doing the same to me. I've been assuming
> > my issue is with the ATA controller. ...
> I agree -- these look like you have either
On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 01:55:51PM -0500, Scott Lambert wrote:
> I have one dual PIII machine doing the same to me. I've been assuming
> my issue is with the ATA controller. ...
>
> Dec 11 02:01:48 netmon kernel: ad2: TIMEOUT - READ_DMA retrying (1 retry
> left) LBA=232068607
> Dec 11 02:02:00
On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 03:25:09PM +1000, Edwin Groothuis wrote:
> For two years I've had a happy gmirror RAID1 system. And a week or
> three ago I was found a degraded system due to a broken disk.
>
> I tried to replace the disk, first with one three sectors too small
> which didn't want to be en
On 5/26/2010 11:33 PM, Alexander Motin wrote:
technews wrote:
So I've started using gmirror recently to mirror 2 1.5 TB drives however
if I reboot the machine or 'gmirror stop -f data1' while the array is
been rebuilt I get the panic below.
Rebooting without geom_mirror loaded does not cause
technews wrote:
> So I've started using gmirror recently to mirror 2 1.5 TB drives however
> if I reboot the machine or 'gmirror stop -f data1' while the array is
> been rebuilt I get the panic below.
> Rebooting without geom_mirror loaded does not cause a panic
> Rebooting with geom_mirror loaded
--On Thursday, April 22, 2010 6:59 PM +1000 Andrew Reilly
wrote:
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 09:19:29AM +0200, Jordi Espasa Clofent wrote:
I wonder if is possible to configure the gmirror rebuild speed.
Neither I've found any related info in the net nor the man pages.
To make it slower, I as
Jordi Espasa Clofent wrote:
Hi,
I wonder if is possible to configure the gmirror rebuild speed.
Neither I've found any related info in the net nor the man pages.
This doesn't do exactly what you want, but might address your problem,
anyway: try "renice +20 [gmirror PID]", where "[gmirror PID]"
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 11:13:49AM +0200, Jordi Espasa Clofent wrote:
> >To make it slower, I assume? When is that a good idea?
>
> It depends on what status your server are.
> For example:
>
> - if I've a fsck in background so the I/O is high, maybe I want to
> make it slower
> - If the box is
On Thu, 22 Apr 2010 11:07:43 +0200
"Patrick M. Hausen" wrote:
> When the rebuild is bringing your production system to
> a crawl and you are willing to face the tradeoff - hopefully
> because you have an additional backup for the worst case.
Fair enough. I've noticed some slowdowns with re-buil
To make it slower, I assume? When is that a good idea?
It depends on what status your server are.
For example:
- if I've a fsck in background so the I/O is high, maybe I want to make
it slower
- If the box is completey unloaded maybe I want to make it quicker
--
I must not fear. Fear is the
Hello,
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 06:59:54PM +1000, Andrew Reilly wrote:
> To make it slower, I assume? When is that a good idea?
When the rebuild is bringing your production system to
a crawl and you are willing to face the tradeoff - hopefully
because you have an additional backup for the worst c
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 09:19:29AM +0200, Jordi Espasa Clofent wrote:
> I wonder if is possible to configure the gmirror rebuild speed.
> Neither I've found any related info in the net nor the man pages.
To make it slower, I assume? When is that a good idea?
Cheers,
--
Andrew
On Thu, Dec 03, 2009 at 11:14:40AM -0500, Mike Jakubik wrote:
> I just installed FreeBSD 8 on a few new servers, i followed my usual
> procedure for creating a geom mirror right after the installer
> finished. However on bootup i get the following notice for my mirror
> device "geometry does not m
On Mon, Mar 02, 2009 at 07:18:07PM -0500, Aryeh M. Friedman wrote:
> Andrew Snow wrote:
> >
> >Sorry, I meant "label -h" instead of just plain "label"... was getting
> >confused with gstripe.
> >
> No matter what I attempt to do with the source drive (ad8) I get
> oprtation not permitted... it le
Andrew Snow wrote:
Sorry, I meant "label -h" instead of just plain "label"... was getting
confused with gstripe.
No matter what I attempt to do with the source drive (ad8) I get
oprtation not permitted... it lets me install the slave drive (ad14)
just fine:
flosoft# gmirror label -h -vb
Sorry, I meant "label -h" instead of just plain "label"... was getting
confused with gstripe.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubsc
Perhaps you used "gmirror configure" instead of "gmirror label" when you
created the gmirror?
You need to use "label" mode to actually save the configuration to disks
for use on next bootup.
- Andrew
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
h
Aryeh M. Friedman wrote:
I have started the procedure for mirroring drives and everything works
fine upto its first mount attempt (read only root... premounted before
/etc/rc runs) and then sees no slices... what I mean is
/dev/mirror/gm0Sxy never appears in the ls of /dev/mirror [bur
/dev/mir
On Wed, November 19, 2008 10:39 am, Bartosz Stec wrote:
> Nenhum_de_Nos pisze:
>> hail,
>>
>> I have an old AthlonXP 1700+ running 7-STABLE:
>>
>> FreeBSD xxx 7.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 7.1-PRERELEASE #1: Thu Nov 13 23:54:59
>> BRT 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/xxx i386
>>
>> where I hav
On Wed, November 19, 2008 10:39 am, Bartosz Stec wrote:
> Nenhum_de_Nos pisze:
>> hail,
>>
>> I have an old AthlonXP 1700+ running 7-STABLE:
>>
>> FreeBSD xxx 7.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 7.1-PRERELEASE #1: Thu Nov 13
>> 23:54:59
>> BRT 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/xxx i386
>>
>> where I h
On Wed, November 19, 2008 10:39 am, Bartosz Stec wrote:
> Nenhum_de_Nos pisze:
>> hail,
>>
>> I have an old AthlonXP 1700+ running 7-STABLE:
>>
>> FreeBSD xxx 7.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 7.1-PRERELEASE #1: Thu Nov 13
>> 23:54:59
>> BRT 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/xxx i386
>>
>> where I
Nenhum_de_Nos pisze:
hail,
I have an old AthlonXP 1700+ running 7-STABLE:
FreeBSD xxx 7.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 7.1-PRERELEASE #1: Thu Nov 13 23:54:59
BRT 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/xxx i386
where I have two 750GB Seagate SATA Disks. They are divided as two slices,
around the fir
On 12/23/-58 20:59, Michael Harris wrote:
> Hi,
>
> after one month with gmirror and gjournal running on a 7.0-RELEASE #p2 amd64
> (built from latest CVS source), the box hung a couple of times when on high
> disk load. Finally, while building some port it won't boot for no reason
> obvious to
> So far it runs okay.
Well a week passed by:
- no answer to my question, but
- no issues to report either
Fwiw.
Cheers,
Robert
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscr
Hi,
> Has anybody else had a chance to try the gmirror patches I posted here a
> few weeks ago ?
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=123630
I ran that patch against 7-stable, build flawless. I currently build a
kernel, by accident I made a small mistake. I installworld'd but forgot to
Pete French <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ah, yes, sorry about that - thought it would be obvious. I always
> submit changes that way as I find that whitespace has a habit
> of breaking otherwise.
> [...]
> How would I set about doing that without the whitespace being messed up
> by email transit ?
Pete French wrote:
[...]
It is true that patch is better in plaintext diff.
How would I set about doing that without the whitespace being messed up
by email transit ? I have always found in the past that tabs end up as
spaces and then patch gets upset hwne you try to apply it.
I sent PR th
> Patch is gzipped and can be easily gunziped after download. (and
> uuencoded in webpage view)
Ah, yes, sorry about that - thought it would be obvious. I always
submit changes that way as I find that whitespace has a habit
of breaking otherwise.
> It is true that patch is better in plaintext di
Miroslav Lachman wrote:
Pete French wrote:
Has anybody else had a chance to try the gmirror patches I posted here a
few weeks ago ? I;ve had no feedback so far - not sre if thats good
news or just that nobody tried them. they can be found here if
people are interested:
http://www.freebsd.org/cg
Terry Sposato wrote:
Miroslav Lachman wrote:
Pete French wrote:
Has anybody else had a chance to try the gmirror patches I posted here a
few weeks ago ? I;ve had no feedback so far - not sre if thats good
news or just that nobody tried them. they can be found here if
people are interested:
Pete French wrote:
Has anybody else had a chance to try the gmirror patches I posted here a
few weeks ago ? I;ve had no feedback so far - not sre if thats good
news or just that nobody tried them. they can be found here if
people are interested:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=123630
Jeremy Chadwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote at 02:20 on 2008-04-18:
> I've documented the DMA problem quite thoroughly. The DMA errors are
> not specific to gmirror:
>
> http://wiki.freebsd.org/JeremyChadwick/Commonly_reported_issues
>
> If the problem is easily repeatable, and you have serial co
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 07:12:06AM +0200, Gianni wrote:
> On 17/apr/08, at 19:28, Josep Pujadas i Jubany wrote:
>> Two weeks ago I installed FreeBSD 7.0 in a new HP Proliant ML110 G5
>> machine
>> and I configured ad0 for using gmirror, waiting for a second disk.
>>
>> I just added a second hard d
On 17/apr/08, at 19:28, Josep Pujadas i Jubany wrote:
Two weeks ago I installed FreeBSD 7.0 in a new HP Proliant ML110 G5
machine
and I configured ad0 for using gmirror, waiting for a second disk.
I just added a second hard disk arrived today from HP ...
# gmirror insert gm0 /dev/ad2
I'm hav
Quoting Clifton Royston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 08:47:43AM -0800, Chris H. wrote:
Quoting John Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>I'm not sure I remember everything from earlier in this thread so I
>don't know if it's relevant, BUT you can't boot from a gstripe volume
>(or from
On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 08:47:43AM -0800, Chris H. wrote:
> Quoting John Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> >I'm not sure I remember everything from earlier in this thread so I
> >don't know if it's relevant, BUT you can't boot from a gstripe volume
> >(or from a gconcat one AFAIK). Inferring from
Quoting "Chris H." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Quoting John Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I'm not sure I remember everything from earlier in this thread so I
don't know if it's relevant, BUT you can't boot from a gstripe
volume (or from a gconcat one AFAIK). Inferring from your fstab
example below i
I'm not sure I remember everything from earlier in this thread so I
don't know if it's relevant, BUT you can't boot from a gstripe volume
(or from a gconcat one AFAIK). Inferring from your fstab example below
it doesn't sound like you intend to but I just wanted to be sure.
Quoting John Nielse
Quoting "Chris H." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Quoting "Chris H." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hello,
I seem to remember a similar question being asked in the past. But never
---8<---snip---8<---
I had originally intended to create a raid mirror on the whole lot of HD's
during the install process. But I wa
Quoting John Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I'm not sure I remember everything from earlier in this thread so I
don't know if it's relevant, BUT you can't boot from a gstripe volume
(or from a gconcat one AFAIK). Inferring from your fstab example
below it doesn't sound like you intend to but I j
Quoting "Chris H." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hello,
I seem to remember a similar question being asked in the past. But never
---8<---snip---8<---
I had originally intended to create a raid mirror on the whole lot of HD's
during the install process. But I wasn't presented, nor could I find that
opti
Hello, and thank you for your reply...
Quoting Matthew Seaman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Chris H. wrote:
Where is the option to create, and install to a gMIRRORED drive-set?
If not, why?
If not, it possible to install to one drive, mirror all availabl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Chris H. wrote:
> Where is the option to create, and install to a gMIRRORED drive-set?
> If not, why?
> If not, it possible to install to one drive, mirror all available drives
> with
> the data on the installed drive?
sysinstall does not provide an
Marc UBM Bocklet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The gmirror man page says that if gmirror is used on a disk, the last
> sector of that disk is overwritten with the metadata gmirror uses.
>
> So what I would like to know is, how risky is it to mirror a disk which
> already has data on it?
>
>
Manuel Martini wrote:
> # sysctl -a | grep jail
> [...]
> security.jail.jailed: 1
> # df
> Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Avail Capacity Mounted on
> /dev/mirror/gm0s1g 129719744 17056610 10228555614%/
> # gmirror status
>NameStatus Components
> mirror/gm0
On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 04:44:05PM -0700, Joe Kelsey wrote:
> For that reason, I have decided that the SII3512 is unreliable and will
> replace it with a Promise controller, basically the cheapest one (TX2).
> I hope it works better.
I've been using "cheap" Promise controllers for years, more r
Joe Kelsey wrote:
I am having a real hard time with gmirror. I recently bought two new
400G SATA disks and I want to mirror them. I think I am following the
directions, but I am not sure.
I generally do the following steps:
edit /boot/loader.conf to add geom_mirror_load.
reboot into single-
On Mar 26, 2007, at 11:19 AM, Marten wrote:
On Sun, 2007-03-25 at 13:53 -0700, Joe Kelsey wrote:
I am having a real hard time with gmirror. I recently bought two new
400G SATA disks and I want to mirror them. I think I am following
the
directions, but I am not sure.
I have seen lockups, sp
On Sun, 2007-03-25 at 13:53 -0700, Joe Kelsey wrote:
> I am having a real hard time with gmirror. I recently bought two new
> 400G SATA disks and I want to mirror them. I think I am following the
> directions, but I am not sure.
>
I have seen lockups, spontaneous reboots, corrupt filsystems on
On Mar 25, 2007, at 11:59 PM, Christopher Schulte wrote:
As I understand it now, the user has to manually account for this
at OS
install, and adjust the disk layout accordingly... yes?
when was the last time you ran fdisk and it didn't leave some spare
sectors at the end? i don't think y
On 12/23/-58 20:59, Joe Kelsey wrote:
> I am having a real hard time with gmirror.
> I recently bought two new 400G SATA disks and I want to mirror them. I
> think I am following the directions, but I am not sure.
>
> I generally do the following steps:
>
> edit /boot/loader.conf to add geom_mi
Hello!
On Sun, Mar 25, 2007 at 05:12:59PM -0700, Joe Kelsey wrote:
> The major thing that needs doing is a detailed explanation of how to
> take two brand new disk drives and mirror them. Nothing in the
> documentation discusses this.
It is supposed to work like this:
http://people.f
Regarding the gmirror talk: I found this helpful, as well:
http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/bsd/2005/11/10/FreeBSD_Basics.html
Has there been any talk of a "gmirror aware" sysinstall that would
adjust the size of the disk layout by one sector to ensure that the
metadata is not overwritten? (and perha
> The major thing that needs doing is a detailed explanation of how to
> take two brand new disk drives and mirror them.
You're right. This is a tutorial.
> Nothing in the
> documentation discusses this.
The in-tree documentation explains the syntax of the admin commands and
the technical
On Mar 25, 2007, at 5:12 PM, Joe Kelsey wrote:
Ivan Voras wrote:
Joe Kelsey wrote:
So, after loading the mirror stuff, I regularly lock up the
system by
trying to perform simple activities on the mirror. What do I
need to do
differently?
Here are the relevant dmesg lines:
atapci0: po
Ivan Voras wrote:
Joe Kelsey wrote:
So, after loading the mirror stuff, I regularly lock up the system by
trying to perform simple activities on the mirror. What do I need to do
differently?
Here are the relevant dmesg lines:
atapci0: port
0xa000-0xa007,0x9800-0x9803,0x9400-0x9407,0x9000-
Joe Kelsey wrote:
> The major thing that needs doing is a detailed explanation of how to
> take two brand new disk drives and mirror them. Nothing in the
> documentation discusses this. Do you have to create file systems on the
This is actually easy:
1. Create everything you need on the first
Joe Kelsey wrote:
> So, after loading the mirror stuff, I regularly lock up the system by
> trying to perform simple activities on the mirror. What do I need to do
> differently?
>
> Here are the relevant dmesg lines:
> atapci0: port
> 0xa000-0xa007,0x9800-0x9803,0x9400-0x9407,0x9000-0x9003,0x8
On Mon, 19 Feb 2007, Anton Yuzhaninov wrote:
AY> DM> 1. Name: ad4g
AY> DM>Mediasize: 225734096384 (210G)
AY> DM>Sectorsize: 512
AY> DM>Mode: r1w1e1
AY> DM>State: ACTIVE
AY> DM>Priority: 0
AY> DM>Flags: BROKEN
AY>
AY> Is any related messages about ad4g in /var/log/messages?
On Mon, 19 Feb 2007, Oliver Fromme wrote:
OF> Dmitry Morozovsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
OF> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/local/etc# gmirror status m0g
OF> > NameStatus Components
OF> > mirror/m0g DEGRADED ad4g
OF> > ad6g (100%)
OF>
OF> It seems that the secon
Dmitry Morozovsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/local/etc# gmirror status m0g
> NameStatus Components
> mirror/m0g DEGRADED ad4g
> ad6g (100%)
It seems that the second disk is broken and locks up the
channel near the end of the disk.
Yo
Hello Dmitry,
You wrote on Sunday, February 18, 2007, 9:53:14 PM:
DM> 1. Name: ad4g
DM>Mediasize: 225734096384 (210G)
DM>Sectorsize: 512
DM>Mode: r1w1e1
DM>State: ACTIVE
DM>Priority: 0
DM>Flags: BROKEN
Is any related messages about ad4g in /var/log/messages?
--
Anton Y
Harald Schmalzbauer wrote:
> I think this is a problem when the internal thermal recalibration takes too
> long.
> Consumer HDDs can be "offline" quiet some time, I don't have numbers handy,
> but see Western Digitals explanation on their SATA RE (RaidEdition) Drives.
> Again, no link hand
Am Dienstag, 30. Januar 2007 09:54 schrieb Oliver Fromme:
> Hi,
>
> This is strange. gmirror just detached one of its disks
> for no apparent reason. I've built a mirror consisting of
> the components ad0 and ad1 (both SATA drives). It has
> been running fine. This is RELENG_6 from 2006-12-20.
On Jan 30, 2007, at 9:54, Oliver Fromme wrote:
Hi,
This is strange. gmirror just detached one of its disks
for no apparent reason. I've built a mirror consisting of
the components ad0 and ad1 (both SATA drives). It has
been running fine. This is RELENG_6 from 2006-12-20.
Yesterday evening
Hi,
At 08:54 30/01/2007, Oliver Fromme wrote:
Hi,
This is strange. gmirror just detached one of its disks
for no apparent reason. [etc]
I've seen similar symptoms on different hardware with ataraid. I
suspect that SATA disks occasionaly fail to make their bus timings
and (some?) controller
On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 02:29:33PM +0300, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote:
> On 1/17/07, Josef Karthauser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > A poll for opinions if I may?
i suppose i'm asking the smae here as well ...
> > I've got a few gmirrors running on various machines, all of which
> > pair up two drive
- Vulpes Velox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Jan 2007 10:15:56 +0900
> "Adrian Chadd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On 17/01/07, Andrew Pantyukhin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > [...after reading the slashdotter's piece of wisdom...]
> > >
> > > Yes, but that's the kind of
On Jan 19, 2007, at 12:42 AM, Vulpes Velox wrote:
When ZFS comes available, I plan to actually run it across multiple
mirrors. It has built in JBOD, but it does not do mirroring. It just
does stripping.
I think you misunderstand ZFS. It is robust against multiple disk
failures. It doesn'
Andrew Pantyukhin wrote:
> Yes, but that's the kind of functionality I have always
> expected to be present in software raid solutions. I
> hope I'll live to see this implemented in geom.
For adding drives there's gconcat, for resizing (well, you currently
have to decide on the maximum size in ad
On Thu, 18 Jan 2007 10:15:56 +0900
"Adrian Chadd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 17/01/07, Andrew Pantyukhin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > [...after reading the slashdotter's piece of wisdom...]
> >
> > Yes, but that's the kind of functionality I have always
> > expected to be present in soft
On 17/01/07, Andrew Pantyukhin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...after reading the slashdotter's piece of wisdom...]
Yes, but that's the kind of functionality I have always
expected to be present in software raid solutions. I
hope I'll live to see this implemented in geom.
That made my eyes blee
On 1/18/07, Scott Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Andrew Pantyukhin wrote:
> On 1/17/07, Josef Karthauser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> A poll for opinions if I may?
>>
>> I've got a few gmirrors running on various machines, all of which
>> pair up two drives at the physical level (i.e. mirror /d
Andrew Pantyukhin wrote:
On 1/17/07, Josef Karthauser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
A poll for opinions if I may?
I've got a few gmirrors running on various machines, all of which
pair up two drives at the physical level (i.e. mirror /dev/ad0s1
with /dev/ad1s1). Of course there are other ways of
On Wednesday 17 January 2007 06:29, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote:
> On 1/17/07, Josef Karthauser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > A poll for opinions if I may?
> >
> > I've got a few gmirrors running on various machines, all of which
> > pair up two drives at the physical level (i.e. mirror /dev/ad0s1
> >
On 1/17/07, Matthew X. Economou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Apart from potentially avoiding a whole disk from being copied
> during a resync after a crash, are there any other advantages to
> using partition level mirroring instead of drive level mirroring?
Joe,
Partition-level software RAID p
> Apart from potentially avoiding a whole disk from being copied
> during a resync after a crash, are there any other advantages to
> using partition level mirroring instead of drive level mirroring?
Joe,
Partition-level software RAID plus LVM is how the following Slashdot
poster manages extendab
1 - 100 of 210 matches
Mail list logo
