On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 12:41:55PM -0600, Dan Allen wrote:
>
> On 11 Jun 2009, at 5:41 PM, Paul B. Mahol wrote:
>
> >Looks like boot(8) is problematic.
>
> Okay, here is the June 13th noon update to this problem.
>
> I once again installed a May 28th build. Rebuilt world and kernel
> from so
On 13 Jun 2009, at 2:41 PM, Dan Allen wrote:
On 13 Jun 2009, at 12:50 PM, Paul B. Mahol wrote:
I doubt it is loader fault, from your description it appears that
loader is never started.
Could you try to remove -DLOADER_ZFS_SUPPORT from Makefile?
/usr/src/sys/boot/i386/loader/Makefile
BI
On 13 Jun 2009, at 12:50 PM, Paul B. Mahol wrote:
I doubt it is loader fault, from your description it appears that
loader is never started.
Could you try to remove -DLOADER_ZFS_SUPPORT from Makefile?
/usr/src/sys/boot/i386/loader/Makefile
BINGO! LOADER_ZFS_SUPPORT is the culprit.
I rebu
On 6/13/09, Dan Allen wrote:
>
> On 12 Jun 2009, at 6:32 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
>
>> On Thursday 11 June 2009 9:33:24 pm Dan Allen wrote:
>>> Isn't boot part of the kernel build? Why would installing the kernel
>>> not cause this problem?
>>
>> No, sys/boot is built during world. Likely some ch
On 11 Jun 2009, at 5:41 PM, Paul B. Mahol wrote:
Looks like boot(8) is problematic.
Okay, here is the June 13th noon update to this problem.
I once again installed a May 28th build. Rebuilt world and kernel
from source. Everything works great. No custom kernel, just GENERIC.
I then me
On 12 Jun 2009, at 9:50 PM, Yuri Pankov wrote:
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 08:24:42PM -0700, Gary Kline wrote:
Whew!! i'm giving thanks to every saint, god and daemon known. i
rebuilt my kernel in very recent days (7.2) on my ancient
500MHz kayak, but did not go further.
On Saturday 13 June 2009 12:08:17 am Gary Kline wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 11:24:07PM -0700, Kent Stewart wrote:
> > On Friday 12 June 2009 08:24:42 pm Gary Kline wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 08:45:01PM -0600, Dan Allen wrote:
> > > > On 12 Jun 2009, at 6:32 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
>
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 11:24:07PM -0700, Kent Stewart wrote:
> On Friday 12 June 2009 08:24:42 pm Gary Kline wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 08:45:01PM -0600, Dan Allen wrote:
> > > On 12 Jun 2009, at 6:32 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
> > > >On Thursday 11 June 2009 9:33:24 pm Dan Allen wrote:
> >
>
On Friday 12 June 2009 08:24:42 pm Gary Kline wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 08:45:01PM -0600, Dan Allen wrote:
> > On 12 Jun 2009, at 6:32 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
> > >On Thursday 11 June 2009 9:33:24 pm Dan Allen wrote:
>
> Whew!! i'm giving thanks to every saint, god and daemon known. i
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 08:24:42PM -0700, Gary Kline wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 08:45:01PM -0600, Dan Allen wrote:
> >
> > On 12 Jun 2009, at 6:32 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
> >
> > >On Thursday 11 June 2009 9:33:24 pm Dan Allen wrote:
> > >>Isn't boot part of the kernel build? Why would inst
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 08:45:01PM -0600, Dan Allen wrote:
>
> On 12 Jun 2009, at 6:32 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
>
> >On Thursday 11 June 2009 9:33:24 pm Dan Allen wrote:
> >>Isn't boot part of the kernel build? Why would installing the kernel
> >>not cause this problem?
> >
> >No, sys/boot is bui
On 12 Jun 2009, at 6:32 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
On Thursday 11 June 2009 9:33:24 pm Dan Allen wrote:
Isn't boot part of the kernel build? Why would installing the kernel
not cause this problem?
No, sys/boot is built during world. Likely some change in /boot/
loader is
causing your problem
On Thursday 11 June 2009 06:33:24 pm Dan Allen wrote:
> On 11 Jun 2009, at 5:41 PM, Paul B. Mahol wrote:
> > Looks like boot(8) is problematic.
> > Anything in /etc/src.conf or /etc/make.conf?
>
> I have never touched or created a src.conf. If there was one there,
> it has been unmodified by me.
>
On Thursday 11 June 2009 9:33:24 pm Dan Allen wrote:
> Isn't boot part of the kernel build? Why would installing the kernel
> not cause this problem?
No, sys/boot is built during world. Likely some change in /boot/loader is
causing your problem. Can you narrow it down to a specific change un
On 11 Jun 2009, at 5:41 PM, Paul B. Mahol wrote:
Looks like boot(8) is problematic.
Anything in /etc/src.conf or /etc/make.conf?
I have never touched or created a src.conf. If there was one there,
it has been unmodified by me.
I HAVE modified make.conf. Here is its contents:
--- /etc/m
On 6/11/09, Dan Allen wrote:
> Okay. I did a
>
> make buildkernel && installkernel
>
> and rebooted, no problems.
>
> I then did a
>
> make buildworld
>
> and rebooted, no problems.
>
> I then did a
>
> make installworld
>
> which completed normally, rebooted, and
>
> BINGO - my
Okay. I did a
make buildkernel && installkernel
and rebooted, no problems.
I then did a
make buildworld
and rebooted, no problems.
I then did a
make installworld
which completed normally, rebooted, and
BINGO - my disk partition table has been zapped.
The problem
In trying to figure this out, I rebuilt a GENERIC kernel after
sync'ing to today's RELENG_7 sources. I then installed it, held my
breath, and rebooted. It works!
So I am now looking at userland (make buildworld && make installworld)
to see if it is the culprit. Another possibility is my
On 11 Jun 2009, at 3:40 PM, Paul B. Mahol wrote:
Are you using ZFS on root partition?
No. The disk is the default (UFS2 I believe).
So I just reinstalled BSD again and this time I did not reinitialize
the file system and after a brief disk integrity check it reinstalled
and files I had
On 6/11/09, Dan Allen wrote:
> I sync with 7-STABLE almost every day. I build everything on a
> Toshiba U205 Satellite. Things are fine for months on end.
>
> I did this on June 8th. Everything was fine.
>
> I did this on June 10th. The machine no longer booted. The entire
> root partition go
20 matches
Mail list logo
