On Saturday 13 June 2009 12:08:17 am Gary Kline wrote: > On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 11:24:07PM -0700, Kent Stewart wrote: > > On Friday 12 June 2009 08:24:42 pm Gary Kline wrote: > > > On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 08:45:01PM -0600, Dan Allen wrote: > > > > On 12 Jun 2009, at 6:32 AM, John Baldwin wrote: > > > > >On Thursday 11 June 2009 9:33:24 pm Dan Allen wrote: > > > > > > Whew!! i'm giving thanks to every saint, god and daemon known. i > > > rebuilt my kernel in very recent days (7.2) on my ancient > > > 500MHz kayak, but did not go further. So still runing on the 7.0 > > > kernel. > > > > > > Will someone send up a flare when it's *safe*? > > > > > > gary > > > > Gary, it isn't affecting everyone. > > > > FreeBSD ruby.owt.com 7.2-STABLE FreeBSD 7.2-STABLE #4: Wed Jun 10 > > 14:07:14 PDT 2009 r...@ruby.owt.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/FREEBSD2 > > i386 > > > > FreeBSD kstewart2.owt.com 7.2-STABLE FreeBSD 7.2-STABLE #6: Wed Jun 10 > > 15:03:03 PDT 2009 > > r...@kstewart2.owt.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/FREEBSD1 i386 > > > > Ruby is an Intel core duo and the other has dual Xeon's. They were all > > installed the canonical way. > > Thanks for the insight, Kent. I'll go ahead and install 7.2 on the > P3, then. Should be done this weekend. >
Coming from the diagnostic side in the days of our Cray, I believe that one broken machine means more than 100 without problems. There just seems to be more to this than is normal. Kent -- Kent Stewart Richland, WA http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
