Re: Realtek 8102EL

2008-07-08 Thread Pyun YongHyeon
On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 11:09:58PM +0900, NAGATA Shinya wrote: > > Thanks! This is good information. It seems that newer 810x PCIe > > controllers seems to use different descriptor format such that > > checksum offload didn't work on these controllers. > > Backout previous patch and try attache

Re: Realtek 8102EL

2008-07-08 Thread NAGATA Shinya
> Thanks! This is good information. It seems that newer 810x PCIe > controllers seems to use different descriptor format such that > checksum offload didn't work on these controllers. > Backout previous patch and try attached patch. I can connect via SSH. It seems work fine. Thank you! -- NAGAT

Re: Realtek 8102EL

2008-07-08 Thread Pyun YongHyeon
On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 08:44:46PM +0900, To NAGATA Shinya wrote: > On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 06:52:20PM +0900, NAGATA Shinya wrote: > > > > re0: MAC rev. 0x0020 > > > > re0: Unknown H/W revision: 0x2480 > > > > device_attach: re0 attach returned 6 > > > > > > > > > > Apply a

Re: Realtek 8102EL

2008-07-08 Thread Pyun YongHyeon
On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 06:52:20PM +0900, NAGATA Shinya wrote: > > > re0: MAC rev. 0x0020 > > > re0: Unknown H/W revision: 0x2480 > > > device_attach: re0 attach returned 6 > > > > > > > Apply attached one and let me know how it goes. > > Thank you for your patch. > > It doe

Re: Realtek 8102EL

2008-07-08 Thread NAGATA Shinya
> > re0: MAC rev. 0x0020 > > re0: Unknown H/W revision: 0x2480 > > device_attach: re0 attach returned 6 > > > > Apply attached one and let me know how it goes. Thank you for your patch. It doesn't work on 6.3-p2. > pci1: on pcib1 > pci1: at device 0.0 (no driver attached) It can fi

Re: Realtek 8102EL

2008-07-08 Thread Pyun YongHyeon
On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 10:42:17AM +0400, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote: > Pyun YongHyeon wrote: > > > re0: port 0x2000-0x20ff mem > > > 0x4820-0x48200 > > > fff,0x4800-0x4800 irq 16 at device 0.0 on pci1 > > > re0: Chip rev. 0x2480 > > ^^ > > Hi, Pyun

Re: Realtek 8102EL

2008-07-07 Thread Andrey V. Elsukov
Pyun YongHyeon wrote: > re0: port 0x2000-0x20ff mem > 0x4820-0x48200 > fff,0x4800-0x4800 irq 16 at device 0.0 on pci1 > re0: Chip rev. 0x2480 ^^ Hi, Pyun Did you look to the last vendors driver? It seems it has different probe code and supports n

Re: Realtek 8102EL

2008-07-07 Thread Pyun YongHyeon
On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 10:14:15AM +0900, Tadashi Takahashi wrote: > I have same motherboard and I tried re patch as follows. > The result is still failed. > > http://people.freebsd.org/~yongari/re/re.HEAD.20080624 > > > re0: port 0x2000-0x20ff mem > 0x4820-0x48200 > fff,0x480

Re: Realtek 8102EL

2008-07-07 Thread Tadashi Takahashi
I have same motherboard and I tried re patch as follows. The result is still failed. http://people.freebsd.org/~yongari/re/re.HEAD.20080624 re0: port 0x2000-0x20ff mem 0x4820-0x48200 fff,0x4800-0x4800 irq 16 at device 0.0 on pci1 re0: Chip rev. 0x2480 re0: MAC rev. 0x0020 r

Re: Realtek 8102EL

2008-07-07 Thread Pyun YongHyeon
On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 07:35:30AM +0900, NAGATA Shinya wrote: > > Could you please try 'boot -v' and see if there is some error messages? > > 're0' is displayed. But it seems like kernel couldn't find a driver. > | re0: Reserved 0x100 bytes for rid 0x10 type 4 at 0x2000 > | pci1: at device

Re: Realtek 8102EL

2008-07-07 Thread NAGATA Shinya
> Could you please try 'boot -v' and see if there is some error messages? 're0' is displayed. But it seems like kernel couldn't find a driver. | re0: Reserved 0x100 bytes for rid 0x10 type 4 at 0x2000 | pci1: at device 0.0 (no driver attached) -- NAGATA Shinya Consoles: internal video/keyboard

Re: Realtek 8102EL

2008-07-07 Thread Xin LI
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 NAGATA Shinya wrote: | I got Intel D945GCLF and it has Realtek 8102EL chip. | But it is not found by kernel. dmesg does not display as 're' or 'rl'. | | How to find hwrev (revision code) to add if_rlreg.h and if_re.c ? | I'm using 6.3-R and added this