On 22/8/17 2:13 am, Ian Smith wrote:
Speaking of mirrors, just for Antipodeans:
Not to forget: https://mirror.aarnet.edu.au/pub/FreeBSD/
FreeBSD-10.4-BETA1-amd64-memstick.img.xz 100% of 441 MB 9 MBps 00m44s
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
On Tue, 22 Aug 2017 03:02:30 +0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
> On 22/8/17 2:54 am, Julian Elischer wrote:
> > On 22/8/17 2:13 am, Ian Smith wrote:
> > > Speaking of mirrors, just for Antipodeans:
> > > ftp://ftp3.au.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/ISO-IMAGES/10.4/
> > >
> > > delivered both
On 22/8/17 2:54 am, Julian Elischer wrote:
On 22/8/17 2:13 am, Ian Smith wrote:
Speaking of mirrors, just for Antipodeans:
> https://download.freebsd.org/ftp/releases/ISO-IMAGES/10.4/
is very slow (~100KB/s) from here tonight - must be your eclipse? -
but
ftp://ftp3.au.freebsd.org/pub/Fre
On 22/8/17 2:13 am, Ian Smith wrote:
Speaking of mirrors, just for Antipodeans:
> https://download.freebsd.org/ftp/releases/ISO-IMAGES/10.4/
is very slow (~100KB/s) from here tonight - must be your eclipse? - but
ftp://ftp3.au.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/ISO-IMAGES/10.4/
delivered bo
Speaking of mirrors, just for Antipodeans:
> https://download.freebsd.org/ftp/releases/ISO-IMAGES/10.4/
is very slow (~100KB/s) from here tonight - must be your eclipse? - but
ftp://ftp3.au.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/ISO-IMAGES/10.4/
delivered both a dvd1.iso and memstick.img at >1MB/s
On Mon, 21 Aug 2017 13:18:34 +, Glen Barber wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 07:20:06PM +1000, Ian Smith wrote:
> > On Sat, 19 Aug 2017 23:04:01 +0200, Marius Strobl wrote:
> > > o The 2017Q3 package set used in the 10.4-RELEASE cycle does not include
> > > KDE4 packages for amd64 and
On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 07:20:06PM +1000, Ian Smith wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Aug 2017 23:04:01 +0200, Marius Strobl wrote:
>
> > The first BETA build of the 10.4-RELEASE release cycle is now available.
>
> > === Known Issues ===
>
> > o The 2017Q3 package set used in the 10.4-RELEASE cycle does no
On Sat, 19 Aug 2017 23:04:01 +0200, Marius Strobl wrote:
> The first BETA build of the 10.4-RELEASE release cycle is now available.
> === Known Issues ===
> o The 2017Q3 package set used in the 10.4-RELEASE cycle does not include
> KDE4 packages for amd64 and i386. Thus, such packages are
Hi,
as FreeBSD 10.4 will become RELEASE in a while and as 11.1 had became RELEASE
not that while ago how one can tell what is the real difference between 10.4
and 11.1 FreeBSD versions?
There are documents that show differences since last release like 11.1 Release
Notes shows whats new since 1
