niss
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: PERC2 RAID support in 4.1-STABLE
>
>
> > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>you write:
> > [...]
> > while we are on the subject, is there anyway of making this
> 'Dell Perc 3/si'
>
> > Its a shorter PCI card than the others, single channel, SCSI
> > LVD. It has OK performance. I am currently using it in a
> > RAID0+1 type config.
>
> Where can I learn more about the pitfalls? I have a model 466
> waiting to get employed (RAID5 config with three IBM drives) and
> get very
At 08:03 PM 10/17/00 +0200, Gerhard Sittig wrote:
>Where can I learn more about the pitfalls? I have a model 466
>waiting to get employed (RAID5 config with three IBM drives) and
>get very poor throughput in the 3MB/s range. I'm aware of the
>expensive directory manipulations but even "dd if=/de
On Tue, Oct 17, 2000 at 09:09 -0400, Mike Tancsa wrote:
> At 01:40 PM 10/17/00 +0100, Mark Powell wrote:
> >
> >Hmmm. Get's a bit confusing with the model and series numbers.
> >The Enterprise 1500 is series 467. Which is the 466?
>
> Its a shorter PCI card than the others, single channel, SCSI
>
Dont know how many different revisions there are, but I picked up a used
PERC/2 which seems to correspond to the 466.
---Mike
At 04:10 PM 10/12/00 +0100, Mark Powell wrote:
> > There are two entirely different RAID controller families that are
> > relabelled as "PERC 2". See
> > ht
> There are two entirely different RAID controller families that are
> relabelled as "PERC 2". See
> http://people.freebsd.org/~msmith/RAID/index.html#ami
> and
> http://people.freebsd.org/~msmith/RAID/index.html#adaptec
>
> for more details.
Do you know which AMI controllers the two compa
