Re: Kernel option USER_LDT issues in -stable

2002-01-23 Thread David Syphers
On Wednesday 23 January 2002 06:07 pm, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > (In fact, does it even make sense to have this as an option and not just > provide this functionality unconditionally?) This is FreeBSD we're talking about... compiling in support for a CPU is optional :) -David To Unsubscribe: se

Re: Kernel option USER_LDT issues in -stable

2002-01-23 Thread Gerald Pfeifer
Daniel Eischen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I can see it being required in -current soon as threadsNG > is going to need it. I don't see the harm in making it > default in -stable, but I can't address any security concerns > (if there are any). Linux has been providing this for years (if not for