Re: IP_MAX_MEMBERSHIPS

2006-04-13 Thread Bruce M Simpson
On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 09:02:32AM -0400, Stephen Clark wrote: > Well I was trying to set up an ospf system with more than 20 neighbors > and could only get 20 neighors to show up in quagga, so I posed the > question to the quagga mailing list and got > the following responses: Thanks, yes, I sa

Re: IP_MAX_MEMBERSHIPS

2006-04-13 Thread Stephen Clark
/usr/src/sys/netinet/in.h #defineIP_MAX_MEMBERSHIPS20/* per socket */ Steve -- "They that give up essential liberty to obtain temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety." (Ben Franklin) "The course of history shows that as a government grows, liberty decre

Re: IP_MAX_MEMBERSHIPS

2006-04-13 Thread Stephen Clark
hip */ netinet/in.h:#defineIP_MAX_MEMBERSHIPS 20 /* per socket */ netinet/ip_output.c: if (i == IP_MAX_MEMBERSHIPS) { netinet/ip_var.h: struct in_multi *imo_membership [IP_MAX_MEMBERSHIPS]; I wonder if IP_MAX_MEMBERSHIP is the right parameter that needs bumping up.

Re: IP_MAX_MEMBERSHIPS

2006-04-12 Thread Robert Watson
On Thu, 13 Apr 2006, Bruce M Simpson wrote: On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 07:32:14AM +0100, Bruce M Simpson wrote: On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 10:34:13PM -0400, Stephen Clark wrote: Can anyone tell me why the maximum number of members in a multicast group is set at 20? Are there issues with increasing

Re: IP_MAX_MEMBERSHIPS

2006-04-12 Thread Bruce M Simpson
On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 07:32:14AM +0100, Bruce M Simpson wrote: > On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 10:34:13PM -0400, Stephen Clark wrote: > > Can anyone tell me why the maximum number of members in a multicast > > group is set at > > 20? > > Are there issues with increasing this number? Ah. Your original

Re: IP_MAX_MEMBERSHIPS

2006-04-12 Thread Bruce M Simpson
On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 10:34:13PM -0400, Stephen Clark wrote: > Can anyone tell me why the maximum number of members in a multicast > group is set at > 20? > Are there issues with increasing this number? Why would one wish to join more than 20 groups on a single socket? I realize making such a

Re: IP_MAX_MEMBERSHIPS

2006-04-12 Thread Nik
I'm running with multicast group set at 60. So far it's ok. IMO, the developer will increase the numbers soon or in new development. On 4/13/06, Stephen Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello, > > Can anyone tell me why the maximum number of members in a multicast > group is set at > 20? > > A

IP_MAX_MEMBERSHIPS

2006-04-12 Thread Stephen Clark
Hello, Can anyone tell me why the maximum number of members in a multicast group is set at 20? Are there issues with increasing this number? Any information would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, Steve Clark -- "They that give up essential liberty to obtain temporary safety, deserve neithe