The convincer for me was Wes Peters' 'Daemon's Advocate' article. He even
personally responded to some of my questions. He pointed out that many of
the same factors that make a good server, make a good workstation.
The article was May 99, BTW. Anyway, that convinced me to give it a try,
and
On Wed, Jul 25, 2001 at 02:48:15PM -0700, Lamont Granquist wrote:
|
| On Tue, 24 Jul 2001, Mit Rowe wrote:
| > I wouldn't use FreeBSD for a desktop if my life depended on it.
|
| I've been using FreeBSD as desktops, both at home and on my work laptop,
I've been running it on my laptop since 3.2
avior and so far, it's not meeting even the most minimum
standards we have here. Again, this is your second and last warning
in compliance with the mailing list charters.
- Jordan
From: Sung Nae Cho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: FreeBSD needs to awake and come out of SERVER only m
Kai Torak writes:
> FreeBSD works great as a desktop O/S!? Sure you have to tweek and
> tune it to be a good server or a good desktop, but who actualy
> expects an O/S to do exactly what you want "out of the box" without
> having to tweek it for that job? For desktop we have all these usb
> thi
