Hi List!
Well, it took me a while to discover the case...
Provider attached my ethernet line to a switch and set up port
security to restrict to three MAC addresses which were already
used by two computers and a network printer.
As soon as provider deletted those restrictions all went well.
Th
On Wednesday 28 May 2008 01:15:18 Boris Samorodov wrote:
> Hello list!
>
>
> When em0 has an inet address while bridge0 doesn't, it seems to be OK:
> -
> bs1% uname -a
> FreeBSD bs1.sp34.ru 7.0-STABLE FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE #0: Sun May 25
> 20:15:26 MSD 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/s
Guido Falsi ha scritto:
I discovered the same thing while experimenting with qemu and bridgeng.
I think it simply works different from (for example) widnows bridging.
I think it's meant to be like that.
It also looks more logical either. I think of the bridge as just a
packet router, which ro
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 02:15:18AM +0400, Boris Samorodov wrote:
> Hello list!
>
>
> When em0 has an inet address while bridge0 doesn't, it seems to be OK:
[...]
> Did I miss something? Thanks!
I discovered the same thing while experimenting with qemu and bridgeng.
I think it simply works diffe
Hello list!
When em0 has an inet address while bridge0 doesn't, it seems to be OK:
-
bs1% uname -a
FreeBSD bs1.sp34.ru 7.0-STABLE FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE #0: Sun May 25 20:15:26 MSD
2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/BSM i386
bs1% ifconfig em0; ifconfig tap0; ifconfig bridge0
em0: f
