Just a wild guess... Perhaps the ipfw is blocking the traffic?
Please post your ipfw rules.
On Sat, 23 Dec 2000, Box1 wrote:
> FreeBSD-4.1.1-Stable
> Box-A= gateway
> Box-B= Apache, ircd, etc... servers
>
> I'm not able to redirect *only* http/https incoming-packets on my
On Sat, Dec 23, 2000 at 10:23:22PM -0500, Box1 wrote:
> FreeBSD-4.1.1-Stable
> Box-A= gateway
> Box-B= Apache, ircd, etc... servers
>
> I'm not able to redirect *only* http/https incoming-packets on my outside
> interface to a box on my local network. Below if from my
On Sat, Nov 11, 2000 at 11:42:46PM -0500, Jon Nathan wrote:
> i'm trying to upgrade a 3.2 box to 4.x. when i tried make buildworld,
> it bailed on miniperl. so i tried -DNOPERL, as suggested in the lists:
Upgrade to RELENG_3 first.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubs
Michael Grant wrote:
> So, if I suck down RELENG_4 today, what do I get? 4.2beta or 4.1.1?
If you ask for RELENG_4, you get RELENG_4. The names like
"4.1-RELEASE," "4.2-BETA," etc. are just labels that refer to specific
points in time along the RELENG_4 development cycle timeline.
HTH
On Tue, 07 Nov 2000 23:08:12 -0500
Michael DeMutis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yikes, I'm lost.
>
> I had always thought that the RELENG_4 tag was always going to carry the
> 4.x-STABLE name. And that the BETA was really 4.x-CURRENT ? What happened
> to CURRENT or has it been done away with?
Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2000 1:05 AM
To: Noor Dawod
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: cannot mount IDE disk under FreeBSD-4.1.1-STABLE
Send disklabel ad1 output.
You are trying to mount the wrong partition (c) on your drive. The c
partition is symbolic and represents the whole drive. You pro
> Yikes, I'm lost.
>
> I had always thought that the RELENG_4 tag was always going to carry the
> 4.x-STABLE name. And that the BETA was really 4.x-CURRENT ? What happened
> to CURRENT or has it been done away with?
There is no 4.x-CURRENT. There is only the RELENG_4 tag denoting the
branch,
Last night I did a 'whois o8.com' and found out that it's registered to:
Domain Name: O8.COM
Registrar: TUCOWS.COM, INC.
The only thing I did to check it's existence was requesting an icmp echo
from o8.com...
So I changed it to some other and the latency vanished.
I know for sure I'll dou
On Thu, 2 Nov 2000, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 03, 2000 at 11:48:49AM +0800, Mars Attack wrote:
> > is there still a cvs repository (internat) that still has 4.1.1-STABLE
> > and not 4.2-BETA? 4.2Beta is still very buggy..
>
> This is the stage of releasin
sr/bin:/usr/local/bin:.
exec $*
and I execute 'lin ./install'. This first
item in PATH should be unecesary (I needed it for some other things) but
I left it just in case. It is $HOME/bin/pgi in my case.
I did these steps just ten minutes ago and then I compiled
hello_world.f w
On Thu, 26 Oct 2000, David Malone wrote:
Yes, I did both: not branding and branding, but with the
same result! PGI images fail when built under FreeBSD,
but the y run (branded or unbranded when compiled on the
Linux native reference machine!).
:>> On Wed, 25 Oct 2000, David Malone wrote:
:>> Yes
> On Wed, 25 Oct 2000, David Malone wrote:
> Yes I did branding all binaries I found in bin directory.
Ahh - but did you try branding the ones produced by compiling your
fortran programs?
David.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the bod
On Wed, 25 Oct 2000, David Malone wrote:
Yes I did branding all binaries I found in bin directory.
Oliver
:>On Wed, Oct 25, 2000 at 07:45:04PM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote:
:>
:>> We are very interested in PGI compilers and therefor I'm looking for a way to
:>> run this great compiler suite on our Fr
On Thu, 26 Oct 2000, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 25, 2000 at 05:13:12PM -0400, Chris BeHanna wrote:
> > If you had these lines in your supfile:
> >
> > *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_4
> > *default delete use-rel-suffix
> >
> > then all of that should have been handl
o: Giorgos Keramidas
}Cc: Chris BeHanna; FreeBSD-Stable
}Subject: Re: All the x11-wm ports b0rken in 4.1.1-STABLE?
}
}
}On Thu, 26 Oct 2000, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
}
}> On Wed, Oct 25, 2000 at 05:13:12PM -0400, Chris BeHanna wrote:
}> > If you had these lines in your supfile:
}> >
On Thu, 26 Oct 2000, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 25, 2000 at 05:13:12PM -0400, Chris BeHanna wrote:
> > If you had these lines in your supfile:
> >
> > *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_4
^^^ - Don't have this one
> > *default delete use-rel-suffix
On Wed, Oct 25, 2000 at 05:13:12PM -0400, Chris BeHanna wrote:
> If you had these lines in your supfile:
>
> *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_4
> *default delete use-rel-suffix
>
> then all of that should have been handled already.
>
> You'll also need
>
> ports-all=
On Sat, Oct 14, 2000 at 07:39:25AM +0200, Neil Blakey-Milner wrote:
|try:
|cd /usr/src/lib/libutil
|make clean depend all install
|cd /usr/src/lib/crypt
Is this a typo or intentional? Cause in my system, there's only
/usr/src/lib/libcrypt
|make clean depend all install
|cd /usr/src/secure/lib/c
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bill Paul
writes:
> The xl driver never holds more than 128 mbuf clusters in the receive ring.
> Whenever a new packet comes in, it sends one of the mbufs out and replaces
> it with a new one. IT DOESN'T HOLD ONTO THEM. It will however complain if
> it can't alloca
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 13 Oct 2000, David Greenman wrote:
...
:Perhaps I should have spoken up earlier, but none of these reports has
: indicated a problem. The "92%" above is the percent of buffers that have been
: allocated and are currently in-use. The system
>"Kuriyama, Kent K Mr (CPF N651KK)" wrote:
>>
>> Chris,
>>
>> Your email prompted me to look at mbuf utilization on a 4.1.1-STABLE box
>> that is currently not in production.
>>
>> outside# netstat -m
>> 130/160/7168 mbufs in u
"Kuriyama, Kent K Mr (CPF N651KK)" wrote:
>
> Chris,
>
> Your email prompted me to look at mbuf utilization on a 4.1.1-STABLE box
> that is currently not in production.
>
> outside# netstat -m
> 130/160/7168 mbufs in use (current/peak/max):
> 12
On Thu, 12 Oct 2000, Matt Heckaman wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> I thought I would through this into the mix:
>
> Server, NOT in production yet: 4.1.1-RELEASE:
>
> matt[beta]:~> uptime;netstat -m
> 10:40AM up 16 days, 1:42, 2 users, load averages: 0.00, 0.00, 0
it down every couple of weeks to clear it
out, it's quite funny. Just to give a roug idea:
root[epsilon]:~# lsof -p 98037 | wc -l
3225
Oh well. :)
On Thu, 12 Oct 2000, Kuriyama, Kent K Mr (CPF N651KK) wrote:
: Chris,
:
: Your email prompted me to look at mbuf utilization on a 4.1.1-ST
Chris,
Your email prompted me to look at mbuf utilization on a 4.1.1-STABLE box
that is currently not in production.
outside# netstat -m
130/160/7168 mbufs in use (current/peak/max):
129 mbufs allocated to data
1 mbufs allocated to packet headers
128/136/1792 mbuf clusters in
> I wonder if this has anything to do with why my Soundwave 128 PCI
> is not recognized. It shows up as an "unknown card" during boot:
>
> Script started on Sun Oct 8 06:12:35 2000
> % dmesg | grep unknown
> pci0: (vendor=0x1073, dev=0x000d) at 9.0 irq 11
> % exit
this is a ymf724f which is s
> The SNDCTL_DSP_SETFMT ioctl *always* returns EINVAL :-(
i fat-fingered the mfc.
sys/dev/sound/pci/emu10k1.c revision: 1.6.2.4 should fix it.
-cg
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Hello Cameron,
I was curious about your new pcm feeder, so I cvsuped to 4.1.1-STABLE
(Sun Oct 8 00:22:45 CEST 2000) and made world and new kernel.
The SNDCTL_DSP_SETFMT ioctl *always* returns EINVAL :-(
Hardware: SB Live! 1024 / EMU10K1
I turned on some debug switches and got this while
28 matches
Mail list logo
