-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
I thought I would through this into the mix:
Server, NOT in production yet: 4.1.1-RELEASE:
matt[beta]:~> uptime;netstat -m
10:40AM up 16 days, 1:42, 2 users, load averages: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
132/352/131072 mbufs in use (current/peak/max):
130 mbufs allocated to data
2 mbufs allocated to packet headers
128/316/32768 mbuf clusters in use (current/peak/max)
720 Kbytes allocated to network (40% in use)
0 requests for memory denied
0 requests for memory delayed
0 calls to protocol drain routines
Heavy Use Workstation, 4.1.1-RELEASE:
10:42AM up 16 days, 49 mins, 9 users, load averages: 0.28, 0.20, 0.17
693/1712/131072 mbufs in use (current/peak/max):
132 mbufs allocated to data
561 mbufs allocated to packet headers
131/1410/32768 mbuf clusters in use (current/peak/max)
3248 Kbytes allocated to network (13% in use)
0 requests for memory denied
0 requests for memory delayed
0 calls to protocol drain routines
So what you're showing below looks pretty normal. Note: I KNOW that I have
a small leak on epsilon. It's from wmbiff, which holds up descriptors like
you would believe. Gotta shut it down every couple of weeks to clear it
out, it's quite funny. Just to give a roug idea:
root[epsilon]:~# lsof -p 98037 | wc -l
3225
Oh well. :)
On Thu, 12 Oct 2000, Kuriyama, Kent K Mr (CPF N651KK) wrote:
: Chris,
:
: Your email prompted me to look at mbuf utilization on a 4.1.1-STABLE box
: that is currently not in production.
:
: outside# netstat -m
: 130/160/7168 mbufs in use (current/peak/max):
: 129 mbufs allocated to data
: 1 mbufs allocated to packet headers
: 128/136/1792 mbuf clusters in use (current/peak/max)
: 312 Kbytes allocated to network (92% in use)
: ^^^^^^^^^^
: 0 requests for memory denied
: 0 requests for memory delayed
: 0 calls to protocol drain routines
: outside# uptime
: 4:32AM up 1 day, 14:01, 1 user, load averages: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
:
: I don't know whether to be concerned about the 92% utilization since the
: number of bytes allocated seems low. The machine has never crashed but then
: it has never served as a server.
:
: Is this kind of mbuf utilization expected?
:
: Kent Kuriyama
: SPAWAR Sys Ctr San Diego D424, CINCPACFLT N671KK
: [EMAIL PROTECTED], 808-471-4125
* Matt Heckaman - mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucida.qc.ca/ *
* GPG fingerprint - A9BC F3A8 278E 22F2 9BDA BFCF 74C3 2D31 C035 5390 *
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.3 (FreeBSD)
Comment: http://www.lucida.qc.ca/pgp
iD8DBQE55c6DdMMtMcA1U5ARArwgAKCS4RiGBzFXwcwQN6TD5yUsVrt6QQCgrt/8
YFTb8kW6FEArAv0N9qS0FZ0=
=kZM5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
