On 18. 12. 7., Jung-uk Kim wrote:
> On 18. 12. 7., Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
>> https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/3744/files#diff-e4eb329834da3d36278b1b7d943b3bc9
>>
>> *) Add devcrypto engine. This has been implemented against
>> cryptodev-linux,
>> then adjusted to work on FreeBSD 8.4
On 18. 12. 7., Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 07, 2018 at 06:38:04PM -0500, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
>> On 18. 12. 6., Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
>>> I'm not subscribed to -stable.
>>>
>>> This is in response to jkim@'s messages here:
>>>
>>> https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2018-Dece
On Fri, Dec 07, 2018 at 06:38:04PM -0500, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
> On 18. 12. 6., Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> > I'm not subscribed to -stable.
> >
> > This is in response to jkim@'s messages here:
> >
> > https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2018-December/090202.html
> > https://lists.free
On Fri, 2018-12-07 at 18:38 -0500, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
> > So while OpenSSL now uses more of its own native C and assembly code
> > (e.g. for AES-NI support), and that's certainly faster than all the
> > overhead that cryptodev(4) brings with it (see jhb@'s post), I wonder:
> >
> > 1. What happens
On 18. 12. 6., Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> I'm not subscribed to -stable.
>
> This is in response to jkim@'s messages here:
>
> https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2018-December/090202.html
> https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2018-December/090202.html
>
> Based on wh
On 12/6/18 4:19 PM, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 06, 2018 at 04:48:35PM -0700, John Nielsen wrote:
>> Is aesni(4) even required if all you want is userland acceleration?
>>
> No, it is not. Same for rdrand_rng(4), if an application uses hw random
> source directly.
To elaborate furthe
I'm not subscribed to -stable.
This is in response to jkim@'s messages here:
https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2018-December/090202.html
https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2018-December/090202.html
Based on what I can tell, OpenSSL 1.1.1 or thereabouts removed th
On Thu, Dec 06, 2018 at 04:48:35PM -0700, John Nielsen wrote:
> Is aesni(4) even required if all you want is userland acceleration?
>
No, it is not. Same for rdrand_rng(4), if an application uses hw random
source directly.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
On 18. 12. 6., Jung-uk Kim wrote:
> On 18. 12. 6., John Nielsen wrote:
>>> On Dec 6, 2018, at 4:04 PM, Xin LI wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 11:37 AM John Nielsen wrote:
I have upgraded two physical machines from 11-STABLE to 12-STABLE recently
(one is 12.0-PRERELEASE r3413
On 18. 12. 6., John Nielsen wrote:
>> On Dec 6, 2018, at 4:04 PM, Xin LI wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 11:37 AM John Nielsen wrote:
>>>
>>> I have upgraded two physical machines from 11-STABLE to 12-STABLE recently
>>> (one is 12.0-PRERELEASE r341380 and the other is 12.0-PRERELEASE r34139
> On Dec 6, 2018, at 4:39 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
>
> On 12/6/18 3:24 PM, John Nielsen wrote:
>>> On Dec 6, 2018, at 4:04 PM, Xin LI wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 11:37 AM John Nielsen wrote:
I have upgraded two physical machines from 11-STABLE to 12-STABLE recently
(o
On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 3:24 PM John Nielsen wrote:
>
> > On Dec 6, 2018, at 4:04 PM, Xin LI wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 11:37 AM John Nielsen wrote:
> >>
> >> I have upgraded two physical machines from 11-STABLE to 12-STABLE recently
> >> (one is 12.0-PRERELEASE r341380 and the other
On 12/6/18 3:24 PM, John Nielsen wrote:
>> On Dec 6, 2018, at 4:04 PM, Xin LI wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 11:37 AM John Nielsen wrote:
>>>
>>> I have upgraded two physical machines from 11-STABLE to 12-STABLE recently
>>> (one is 12.0-PRERELEASE r341380 and the other is 12.0-PRERELEASE r
> On Dec 6, 2018, at 4:04 PM, Xin LI wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 11:37 AM John Nielsen wrote:
>>
>> I have upgraded two physical machines from 11-STABLE to 12-STABLE recently
>> (one is 12.0-PRERELEASE r341380 and the other is 12.0-PRERELEASE r341391). I
>> noticed today that neither ma
On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 11:37 AM John Nielsen wrote:
>
> I have upgraded two physical machines from 11-STABLE to 12-STABLE recently
> (one is 12.0-PRERELEASE r341380 and the other is 12.0-PRERELEASE r341391). I
> noticed today that neither machine seems to be utilizing /dev/crypto.
> Typically I
On Thu, 06 Dec 2018 20:19:44 +0100, John Nielsen wrote:
>
> I have upgraded two physical machines from 11-STABLE to 12-STABLE
> recently (one is 12.0-PRERELEASE r341380 and the other is
> 12.0-PRERELEASE r341391). I noticed today that neither machine seems
> to be utilizing /dev/crypto. Typically
I have upgraded two physical machines from 11-STABLE to 12-STABLE recently (one
is 12.0-PRERELEASE r341380 and the other is 12.0-PRERELEASE r341391). I noticed
today that neither machine seems to be utilizing /dev/crypto. Typically I see
at least ssh/sshd have the device open plus some programs
17 matches
Mail list logo