Re: reading process memory

David Nugent wrote: Tofik Suleymanov wrote: Thank you for brief and altogether extensive explanation of the case.The thing i wanted to do is to read let's say portions of memory where .bss and .data block of a running program reside. is that possible ? Yes. Debuggers offer

Re: reading process memory

Diomidis Spinellis wrote: Tofik Suleymanov wrote: Diomidis Spinellis wrote: Tofik Suleymanov wrote: The only way you're going to be able to read another processes address space is in the kernel.Even a process running as root is not able to read another process's data. Incorrect

Re: reading process memory

David Nugent wrote: Tofik Suleymanov wrote: Thank you for brief and altogether extensive explanation of the case.The thing i wanted to do is to read let's say portions of memory where .bss and .data block of a running program reside. is that possible ? Yes. Debuggers offer

Re: reading process memory

Diomidis Spinellis wrote: Tofik Suleymanov wrote: The only way you're going to be able to read another processes address space is in the kernel.Even a process running as root is not able to read another process's data. Incorrect; see this example: $ sed -e 's/this/tha

Re: reading process memory

David Nugent wrote: Tofik Suleymanov wrote: Thank you for brief and altogether extensive explanation of the case.The thing i wanted to do is to read let's say portions of memory where .bss and .data block of a running program reside. is that possible ? Yes. Debuggers offer

Re: reading process memory

s a solid chapter in most OS books. Thank you for brief and altogether extensive explanation of the case.The thing i wanted to do is to read let's say portions of memory where .bss and .data block of a running program reside. is that possible ? Sincerely, Tofik Suleymanov ___

reading process memory

ch things ? Any clue would be appreciated. Thanks, Tofik Suleymanov ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: problem with mpt

Matthew Jacob wrote: working on it over the next month Thank you for reply. Can i help somehow with this issue? ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "

Re: problem with mpt

Kris Kennaway wrote: On Wed, Mar 22, 2006 at 08:37:54PM +, Tofik Suleymanov wrote: Hello folks, HP DL 140 box with freebsd 6.1-PRERELEASE installed: FreeBSD xxx.xxx.com 6.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 6.1-PRERELEASE #0: Thu Feb 23 09:23:17 EST 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys

Re: Anyone seen this scsi error before ?

Graham Bentley wrote: Recently swapped out my Sony for a HP DAT and got this first time in dmesg (sa0:ahc0:0:6:0): PREVENT ALLOW MEDIUM REMOVAL. CDB: 1e 0 0 0 0 0 (sa0:ahc0:0:6:0): CAM Status: SCSI Status Error (sa0:ahc0:0:6:0): SCSI Status: Check Condition (sa0:ahc0:0:6:0): UNIT ATTENTION asc

Re: Remote tunefs -n enable

MC wrote: Hello again I have another issue on the same box. The bloke who installed FreeBSD 6.0onto the machine is a linux man. He didn't know about softupdates nor apparently does he know yet about option 4 [read only singule user mode] on the bootloader. Consequently he hasn't set softupdat

Re: troubles compiling latest RELENG_6

Sam Leffler wrote: Tofik Suleymanov wrote: After cvsuping latest RELENG_6: make buildworld ( executes fine) make buildkernel (gives an error - look below) cc -c -O -pipe -march=pentium3 -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith

troubles compiling latest RELENG_6

After cvsuping latest RELENG_6: make buildworld ( executes fine) make buildkernel (gives an error - look below) cc -c -O -pipe -march=pentium3 -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -fformat-extensions -std=c99 -

Re: Kernel panic after upgrade to 6.0-STABLE

Ales wrote: Joao Barros wrote: You should recompile the nvidia port with the new kernel. Boot with the driver disabled in the meantime. On 11/5/05, Ales <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello. After upgrade to RELENG_6, buildworld, buildkernel, installkernel, reboot I got this error. With 5.4

Re: IPFW2 patch

Andrey V. Elsukov wrote: Hello, Developers! Sorry, my english is bad. :( Patch to IPFW2 for adding restrictions of the traffic with use IPFW bytes counters. It include two parts: * First part is ipfw_bound.patch, this part add ipfw rule options "bound VALUE" and "check-bound NUM". Example: #

Re: Can no longer update any ports. Configure problem

Alastair G. Hogge wrote: Hello, I get the following for a whole bunch of out dated ports on my system. This is taken from autoconf, but it's basicly the same for all other ports. ===> Vulnerability check disabled, database not found ===> Extracting for autoconf-2.59_2 => Checksum OK for autocon

more troubles with ATA

Good day Soren, i've applied ATA mkIII patch on freshly cvsuped 5.4-STABLE and experienced problems with onboard sata controller.Here is a fragment from dmesg output: atapci1: port 0xe000-0xe00f,0xb70-0xb73,0x970-0x977,0xbf0-0xbf3,0x9f0-0x9f7 irq 22 at device 10.0 on pci0 ata2: on atapci1 ata

Re: UPDATE: ATA mkIII official patches for releng_5

Damian Gerow wrote: Thus spake Soren: : I've just uploaded the latest ATA mkIII patches for releng_5 (and : releng_5_4 for that matter). : : Since this work is now in -current there will only be releng_5 patches : now and then if there is sufficient interest. Since the work was done for ATAPICAM