wouldn't it just be easier to do this in a jail, and then all of these
little bits would be taken care of?
On 24 April 2018 at 01:48, O'Connor, Daniel wrote:
>
>
> > On 24 Apr 2018, at 08:14, Glen Barber wrote:
> > I think you might not have the devfs mount in the image. With the paths
> > pro
Back everything up. Forget about upgrading you are making your life harder.
Do a ZFS install with BE's then port your apps. It will be quicker less
prone to errors and you will end up with a better system in the end. If the
system is a bit of a rats nest, then this would be the ideal time to
docume
I have a vague memory of these controllers doing something odd with the end
of the volume but can't remember where or when, but I know I would
generally avoid them. It looks like you are using them in jbod mode, but if
you aren't do so. If you can reflash them to hba mode even better. If you
are st
have you tried meta builds and pkgbase?
On 3 October 2017 at 16:38, Dan Mack wrote:
> Jakub Lach writes:
>
> > On the other hand, I'm having tremendous increases in Unixbench scores
> > comparing to
> > 11-STABLE in the April (same machine, clang 4 then, clang 5 now) (about
> > 40%).
> >
> > I
Have a look at pkgbase, Im not sure of the current status, but its worth
being aware, and it works quite well with my setup. Caution will be needed
though as its new.
On 13 September 2017 at 01:03, Rainer Duffner
wrote:
>
> > Am 13.09.2017 um 00:09 schrieb Jason Tubnor :
> >
> > I found this use
but I doubt we will see a 100x increase.
> >
> > /A
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 1:03 PM, krad wrote:
> >
> >> Its worth noting you should also go for GPT layout and have a 100meg or
> so
> >> partition provisioned as well so you can do a ue
Its worth noting you should also go for GPT layout and have a 100meg or so
partition provisioned as well so you can do a uefi boot. Even if you arent
going to use it right now.
On 30 January 2017 at 03:41, Aristedes Maniatis wrote:
> On 30/1/17 2:20pm, Freddie Cash wrote:
> > And, you may be ab
I use these options in my src.conf
WITH_FAST_DEPEND=yes
WITH_CCACHE_BUILD=yes
I can often get build times of about 9 min but can got upto about 30 mins
in jenkins depending on how much has changed. This is on a i5-3570K. It
does have 32GB and ssd l2arc. Those times are for a buildworld, buildker
NOTE: you can only boot from gpt layout in uefi mode in windows
On 17 October 2016 at 17:52, Yamagi Burmeister wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Oct 2016 03:44:14 +0300
> Rostislav Krasny wrote:
>
> > First of all I faced an old problem that I reported here a year ago:
> > http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.os.
Does this just affect MBR layouts? If possible you might want to consider
UEFI booting for both windows and other os's, It's probably safer as you
dont need to plays with partitions and bootloaders.
On 17 October 2016 at 13:11, Rostislav Krasny wrote:
> On 17.10.2016 11:57:16 +0500, Eugene M. Zh
are you sure you aren't hitting a port or something?
# uname -r ; echo "abc_ABC.def" | sed -e 's/[^A-Z0-9]//g' ; which sed ;
md5 /usr/bin/sed
10.3-STABLE
ABC
/usr/bin/sed
MD5 (/usr/bin/sed) = 34e6aedf3b42cbd6dd8379342626e0db
# uname -r ; echo "abc_ABC.def" | sed -e 's/[^A-Z0-9]//g' ; which sed
Hi, as 11 is getting closeish to release is there anything special we need
to do in order to upgrade from 10 -> 11. I usually use the makeworld
method, but I heard that in 11 the base os would be packaged in a different
way using pkgng. I cant find any hard information on this though, so
currently
Olhovchenkov wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 09, 2016 at 02:29:09PM +0100, krad wrote:
>
> > I doubt that will happen as you are asking to pollute every release
> > installation for an edge condition when there is numerous work arounds
> > that would be acceptable to most. eg two l
016 at 08:39:42AM +0100, krad wrote:
>
> > googles will be pretty static, but i would just use them as a one off, ie
> > with ntpdate
>
> i am talk about freebsd system/project.
>
> >
> > On 8 June 2016 at 10:48, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> >
> > >
googles will be pretty static, but i would just use them as a one off, ie
with ntpdate
On 8 June 2016 at 10:48, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 02:29:29AM +0200, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
>
> > Slawa Olhovchenkov writes:
> > > IMHO, ntp.conf need to include some numeric IP
running this at boot time may help as well
unbound-control set_option val-permissive-mode: yes
then after ntpd has started up run this
unbound-control set_option val-permissive-mode: no
Yes work around's, but work around's work by definition.
On 7 June 2016 at 15:00, krad wrote:
it's a non solvable problem though as its a deadlock. You have to remove
one of the criteria in order to fix the issue automatically.
On 7 June 2016 at 14:32, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 07:29:32AM -0600, Ian Lepore wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2016-06-07 at
whops that should be
ntpdate_hosts not servers
On 7 June 2016 at 12:09, krad wrote:
> something as simple as this thrown in /etc/periodic/daily/ would probably
> do it.
>
> #!/bin/sh
> ip=`dig pool.ntp.org +short | head -1'
> cp /etc/hosts /etc/hosts.old &&
&g
enable=yes
ntpdate_servers="ntp-server"
On 7 June 2016 at 11:43, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 11:35:59AM +0100, krad wrote:
>
> > Like i said you could configure ntpdate as well as ntpd, but give it a
> > known good ip. It will only run onc
.
On 7 June 2016 at 09:47, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 09:00:29AM +0100, krad wrote:
>
> > Well there is a deadlock situation there so you have to relax one of the
> > conditions, for one time at least.
> >
> > Your best bet is to do a manual
Well there is a deadlock situation there so you have to relax one of the
conditions, for one time at least.
Your best bet is to do a manual ntpdate against a fixed ip of known
goodness. If you have a lot of machines you need to do this on, use ansible
or similar to do the heavy lifting for you. An
I think the new pivotroot type stuff in 11 may help a lot with this
https://www.freebsd.org/news/status/report-2015-10-2015-12.html#Root-Remount
On 28 April 2016 at 10:31, Malcolm Herbert wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 12:44:28PM +0500, Eugene M. Zheganin wrote:
> |So, I'm still struggling
I would not use the root dataset. Create a ROOT/ one so it looks for
the kernel in "zboot:/ROOT/fist/boot/kernel/kernel" or similar. This way
you are compatible with beadm.
On 28 April 2016 at 08:44, Eugene M. Zheganin wrote:
> Hi.
>
> So, I'm still struggling with my problem when I cannot boo
r 8, 2016 at 9:17 AM, krad wrote:
>
> > Its worth noting you can also select BEs from beastie now as well.
>
>
>
> While this is a great feature I still find it strange that I have to
> install a 3rd party app (beadm) to get FreeBSD core functionality (BE) .
>
Its worth noting you can also select BEs from beastie now as well.
On 7 March 2016 at 22:21, Will Green wrote:
> On 2016-03-07 17:24, Steven Hartland wrote:
>
>> On 07/03/2016 16:43, Will Green wrote:
>>
>>> On 4 Mar 2016, at 18:49, Mark Dixon wrote:
Will Green sundivenetworks.com> w
Dont forget alignment and ashift. You may also want to test compression as
well. IF you have spare cpu cycles I would imagine the systems cpu will
handle it faster than any onboard ssd compression. Benchmarking would be of
use here though.
On 9 February 2016 at 15:54, Patrick M. Hausen wrote:
>
Just a sanity check 1st.
Are you going to be using zfs or ufs?
If zfs you probably want the reflash the card the the relevant HBA firmware
rather the the raid firmware. This will expose the disks nativly which is
best for zfs.
Sorry if this isn't appropriate for you but I would thought I would c
though.
On 26 November 2015 at 16:32, Freddie Cash wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 2:19 AM, krad wrote:
>
>> true, but in my experience usb pen drives are variable in terms of
>> performance across different sticks and different areas of the same stick.
>> This can complic
haven't been able to sort the down time yet.
On 25 November 2015 at 12:16, Gerrit Kühn wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Nov 2015 12:06:38 +0000 krad wrote about Re:
> ZFS - poor performance with "large" directories:
>
> K> consumer SSDs are cheap enough now not to bother with u
consumer SSDs are cheap enough now not to bother with usb drives I would
imagine.
On 25 November 2015 at 07:12, Gerrit Kühn wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Nov 2015 17:11:54 +0100 Albert Cervin
> wrote about Re: ZFS - poor performance with "large" directories:
>
> AC> Will try a bit with the meta limit.
>
make sure atime if off for starters on the filesystem
On 24 November 2015 at 14:00, Albert Cervin wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Please feel free to direct me to a list that is more suitable.
>
> We are trying to set up a fileserver solution for a web application that we
> are building. This fileserver is
I disagree, get the remote hands to copy the serial number to an easily
visible location on the drive when its in the enclosure. Then label the
drives with the serial number (or a compatible version of it). That way the
label is tied to the drive, and you dont have to rely on the remote hands
100%.
It was a control thing again, if you were using a partition another
application could be using the drive on another partition, therefore zfs
couldn't guarantee exclusive use of the disk so had to be more careful in
the way it operated the drive. I think this meant I went into write through
mode lik
From what i remember its a control thing. If you have another layer below
zfs, be it software based or hardware based, zfs cant be sure what is going
on, therefore cant guarantee anything. This is quite a big thing when it
comes to data integrity which is a big reason to use zfs. I remember having
Sorry but it appears I dont have the core so am not able to match it up.
Mostly likely another will happen later today though as ive now fixed
dumpdev on the box
On 5 October 2015 at 08:05, krad wrote:
> I will have to have a look when i get home as the box is down at present.
> Pr
I will have to have a look when i get home as the box is down at present.
Probably another panic 8(
On 5 October 2015 at 06:26, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 04, 2015 at 07:31:43PM +0100, krad wrote:
> > Is anyone else having problems with squid core dumping on Freebsd
&g
Is anyone else having problems with squid core dumping on Freebsd 10-stable
when using the transparent caching feature. It started happening recently
after I re enabled ipv6 on my network. It may just be coincidence though.
It has even caused the odd kernel panic but not every time.
FreeBSD xx 10.
As
$ grep REQUIRE /etc/rc.d/ntpd
# REQUIRE: DAEMON ntpdate FILESYSTEMS devfs
You could set something similar to the following in the rc.conf
ntpdate_hosts="a.b.c.d w.x.y.z"
ntpdate_enable=yes
On 14 July 2015 at 14:43, Paul Mather wrote:
> I believe I ran afoul of a circular dependency bet
and just to be safe wrap it all up in a VIMAGE jail
On 1 October 2013 14:39, Ronald Klop wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Sep 2013 23:50:02 +0200, Charles Swiger
> wrote:
>
> Hi--
>>
>> On Sep 27, 2013, at 2:18 AM, Michael BlackHeart
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello there,
>>> It's quite off-topic, but I'm using f
once you have it all working and understood have a look at the following
port ''usr/ports/sysutils/beadm'' It may make things a little easier to
manage in the future. In my experience BE's on zfs rock.
On 9 September 2013 02:02, J David wrote:
> After setting up a new machine to boot from a ZFS
sorry for the late reply, im running virtualbox ontop of solaris 11, i will
extract the verbose boot info, and all the version numbers when I get
access later today
On 11 August 2013 01:16, Bryan Venteicher wrote:
>
>
> - Original Message -
> > Hi
> >
> > Was there any progress on the th
Hi
Was there any progress on the thread below? I have a freebsd guest ontop of
solaris 11 exhibiting this problem. I'm on a pretty upto date stable
kernel. The TSO fix works fine but i guess im taking a performance hit with
it disabled
FreeBSD carrera.snaffler.net 9.2-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 9.2-PRER
2010/1/18 Morgan Wesström
> O. Hartmann wrote:
> > I realise a strange behaviour of several FreeBSD 8.0-STABLE/amd64 boxes.
> > All boxes have the most recent STABLE. One box is a UP system, two
> > others SMP boxes, one with a Q6600 4-core, another XEON with 2x 4-cores
> > (Dell Poweredge III).
43 matches
Mail list logo
