Re: 5.4 / netstat problem

2005-04-03 Thread Viktor Ivanov
Jake Scott wrote: Hi there. I've updated my source to RELENG_5 as of yesterday, and build world and a new kernel. The "netstat -rn" command doesn't work ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) {0} /usr/src > netstat -rn netstat: kvm not available Routing tables rt_tables: symbol not in namelist This loo

Re: ULE status

2005-02-08 Thread Viktor Ivanov
On Tue, Февруари 8, 2005 15:58, Ion-Mihai Tetcu каза: >> I've been using only SCHED_ULE on my UP WS, even when there was #error >> def. It never broke, not even once :) Though I think there's trouble >> with SMP and/or HTT. I tried it once on a P4 and it paniced. >> >> On the other hand, using SCHE

Re: ULE status

2005-02-08 Thread Viktor Ivanov
On Tue, Февруари 8, 2005 14:43, Ion-Mihai Tetcu каза: > Could you tell us again after a week ? There used to be a panic when > using rtprio to raise the priority of a running process, do you know if > it's fix ? > I never had those, and I usually run mplayer with rtprio 30... Though mplayer never

Re: ULE status

2005-02-08 Thread Viktor Ivanov
On Tue, Февруари 8, 2005 14:33, Michael Nottebrock каза: > On Tuesday, 8. February 2005 13:07, Mipam wrote: >> I saw several changes to sched_ule.c in the 5 stable branch. >> Beneath is one of them: >> >> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-src/2005-February/039863.html >> >> Is the ULE schedule