On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 06:58:34AM -0500, Brian Szymanski wrote:
> Stijn, thanks for your help, I'm getting closer...
Great!
> > > But most importantly, gvinum configuration (at least for a raid-5 plex)
> > > still doesn't persist across a reboot :(
> >
> > That's a bug; I think it might be relat
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 10:38:29PM -0500, Brian Szymanski wrote:
> I took 6.0 for a test drive today and was disappointed to find that
> vinum/gvinum are still in disarray. For example there is a man page for
> vinum, but only a gvinum binary. gvinum help still lists lots of old vinum
> comman
On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 12:17:21AM -0500, Mike Jakubik wrote:
> Mark Kirkwood wrote:
> >Is a minor update to the handbook needed in order avoid confusion
> >then? e.g. I have been commenting out CPU_I586 on all my PIII systems
> >in the (mistaken it would seem) belief that having CPU_I686 only wa
On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 05:04:57PM -0700, secmgr wrote:
> Whatever you do, don't complain about it on this list, or you'll just be
> told that if you really wanted raid, you should be running SCSI disks
> and a raid adapter. They may allow that 3ware does ok, but no ATA drive
> should ever be r
On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 08:49:15PM +0100, Christian Brueffer wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 02:31:00PM +0100, Stijn Hoop wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 12:18:57AM +0100, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote:
> > > I was thinking about gvinum for the storage server, but given
On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 12:18:57AM +0100, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote:
> I was thinking about gvinum for the storage server, but given the
> current documentation and the discussions about it now, I don't want to
> risk it.
IMHO it's pretty stable in 6.0. I've been running gvinum RAID-5 for a
while n
On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 10:28:23AM +, Nick Barnes wrote:
> At 2005-11-29 10:19:17+, "Greg 'groggy' Lehey" writes:
> > On Thursday, 24 November 2005 at 11:17:41 -0500,
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > >
> > > On the [Dell] warrenty... I'm hard on equipment and I depend on my
> > > equipm
On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 01:20:47PM +0100, Tomas Palfi wrote:
> I thought I could check previous gvinum config with the gvinum> list
> command in its own shell. When I run this command for either gvinum or
> vinum, they both reported no volumes.
You should be able to use the list command to view th
On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 01:59:27PM +0200, Stijn Hoop wrote:
> Did you start from scratch by wiping the former configuration without loading
> gvinum?
>
> Use
>
> # dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/da0 bs=1m count=128
>
> to be sure. Do this WITHOUT loading any of the vinum modu
Hi,
First: do _NOT_ use vinum on 5.4, use gvinum.
On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 12:43:01PM +0100, Tomas Palfi wrote:
> I am still struggling to set up a one way mirror on two 72GB disks on
> 5.4 intel platform, however, there seems to be a lot of confusion about
> what to use in the first place. this i
On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 12:27:28PM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote:
> I'm also interested in fixing the omnipresent nve-problems, but reading
> the manpages for nve(4) reveals the bad circumstance that this driver
> seems to be 'wrapped' around a Linux binary object. Nvidia obviously
> isn't willing to
Hi,
I have a server set up to boot from a gvinum mirror volume. This was
all working fine, so I then proceeded to load my data on it, safe in
the knowledge that all was well.
However, all was not well after the last reboot: it seems that while
the two ATA disks probe, for some odd reason GEOM doe
On Sat, Aug 13, 2005 at 08:11:52PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Quoting Sam Leffler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> >The ipw and iwi drivers (at least) have never worked right so far as
> >I can tell. At one point I tried the iwi driver and it kinda worked
> >but failed in many common scenarios
On Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 08:27:13AM -0400, Mike Jakubik wrote:
> On Fri, April 15, 2005 5:13 am, Ulrik Guenther said:
> > on my 5.4-RC1 installation with a 3com 3c905B NIC I got the following
> > messages while transferring a big file (31GByte) over 100MBit ethernet:
> >
> > Apr 15 08:46:18 verleihn
On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 11:08:26AM +1030, Tristan wrote:
> can anyone confirm what the preferred tool is
> in 5.3-STABLE, vinum or gvinum ? Is gvinum
> ready for production use in a RAID5 config ?
You need to use gvinum on 5-STABLE and -CURRENT.
As far as I can tell, it would be wise to update t
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 11, 2004 at 10:44:10PM -0500, Brian Szymanski wrote:
> After a long and happy time with vinum under 4.8 -> 4.10, I'm finding
> things very broken in 5.3. The config I'm trying to accomplish is
> relatively simple, just a root mirrored volume configuration which worked
> under 4.x.
Hi,
I downgraded a machine from 5-CURRENT to 4-STABLE this morning, so I tried
to get me a new include directory after the installworld by doing
# cd /usr
# mv include include.old
# mkdir include
# cd src
# make installincludes
Which went okay, but my new build of ports/www/phoenix failed due to
On Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 11:48:38AM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> Stijn Hoop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > This is with PERL_VERSION=5.8.0 in /etc/make.conf, and no /usr/bin/perl
> > (since this is -CURRENT), which is why mkhtmlindex barfs.
>
> "use.perl
On Fri, Dec 20, 2002 at 10:05:28AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On 20 Dec, Emiel Kollof wrote:
> > * Stijn Hoop ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> >
> >> > I might be the first to have noticed. What if suddenly 20 more people in
> >> > the span of the next
Hi,
for those interested I've just submitted a port that compiles and installs
the NVIDIA driver for you.
See PR ports/45988,
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=45988
Anybody is welcome to improve upon this version, it works for me as is
and I won't have the time to maintain this in the
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 10:06:11AM +, Tarquin McDowell wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 09:47:39AM +0100, Stijn Hoop wrote:
> > Anyone getting any better results? Is there something I can do to fix
> > this? The drivers are of no use to me if they are this unreliable.
> >
On Wed, Mar 13, 2002 at 10:23:04PM +0100, Wilko Bulte wrote:
> If it is any consolation: Philips CDRW drives die anyway. One for me,
> and 2 for 2 friends, all early deads with low mileage.
Add another one to that list :( Burned roughly 100 CDs in 1 year...
--Stijn
--
] Nothing safer than a 'c
On Wed, Nov 21, 2001 at 11:40:45PM -0700, Chad R. Larson wrote:
> Guys, there seems to be being an explosive growth in the size of the
> CVS repository.
>
> When I first started keeping a local copy, it was about 800meg. Now
> on my system it's almost run itself out of a 3GB partition. Is
> the
On Thu, May 17, 2001 at 09:31:27AM -0400, Jamie Norwood wrote:
> On Thu, May 17, 2001 at 07:43:27AM -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
> >
> > That seems a little dangerous - perhaps some of the files will have
> > md5 appearing in other lines for other reasons, and that would mess
Read 'CHE
On Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 03:35:44PM +0100, Ian Dowse wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Stijn Hoop writes:
> >Now, I know for sure that I only had /usr/ports mounted during the time.
> >And I think it's very strange that the daily security check would fail
> >
Hi,
I recently installed a new machine for testing NFS mounts. Things worked
great, so I went to attend to other things. I tested the NFS mounts with
my work machine as the server. Now I regularly upgrade my work machine, so it
gets reboot every couple of days. I forgot that the client still had
On Fri, Mar 09, 2001 at 10:19:07AM +, Josef Karthauser wrote:
> It's my long term goal to produce a proper branch mailing list, but this
> means doing clever stuff with the commits because it's possible for a
> committer to affect more than one branch at a time.
And it would be even more coo
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 07, 2001 at 10:35:33PM +1300, Dan Langille wrote:
> Tomorrow I'm going to install a stable snaphot on a client's box. I've
> seen some issues lately in the list. All of which seem to have been
> resolved lately. I'm wondering if I should be going for 4.2-20010306-
> STABLE or
On Tue, Nov 21, 2000 at 12:33:11PM -0800, Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group wrote:
> >
> > I'm on tangent mode this afternoon, so this is not a direct reply.
> >
[excellent explanation that makes perfect sense snipped for brevity]
Even if there's nothing else gained by this discussion, can
29 matches
Mail list logo
