#0: Wed May 13 06:54:13 UTC 2015
FreeBSD 10.1-RELEASE-p10 #0: Wed May 13 06:54:13 UTC 2015
10.1-RELEASE-p10
It seems to me the verions numbering is not correct, but the patch *is* there,
it should be 10.1-p11, right?
> 10 jun 2015 kl. 11:01 skrev Palle Girgensohn :
>
> Hi,
>
&g
FreeBSD 6.0 (IA32), sorry...
--On onsdag, november 23, 2005 17.32.19 +0100 Palle Girgensohn
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi!
I just installed a Dell 2850 with a DRAC card and a PS/2 keyboard. The
keyboard stopped working when entering multiuser mode, and I found an old
email on curren
Hi!
I just installed a Dell 2850 with a DRAC card and a PS/2 keyboard. The
keyboard stopped working when entering multiuser mode, and I found an old
email on current from September 2004, where Brooks said to comment away
ukbd lines in devd.conf. I did, PS/2 keyboard works but the DRAC remote
--On måndag, oktober 17, 2005 18.18.56 -0400 Brian Fundakowski Feldman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sun, Oct 16, 2005 at 09:04:58PM +0400, Igor Pokrovsky wrote:
On Sun, Oct 16, 2005 at 06:35:51PM +0200, Michael Nottebrock wrote:
> On Sunday, 16. October 2005 09:06, Igor Pokrovsky wrote:
>
--On fredag, oktober 14, 2005 17.40.03 +0200 Michael Nottebrock
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Friday, 14. October 2005 17:29, Michael Nottebrock wrote:
On Friday, 14. October 2005 16:04, Palle Girgensohn wrote:
> This gives me problems. I maintain the postgresql ports, and p
Hi!
I'm having some difficulties using the heimdal installed from /usr/src.
Here's the difference between the heimdal port and the heimdal distributed
in the base:
$ ldd /usr/local/lib/libkrb5.so
/usr/local/lib/libkrb5.so:
libcrypto.so.3 => /lib/libcrypto.so.3 (0x281b3000)
libas
Hi!
I'm having some difficulties using the heimdal installed from /usr/src.
Here's the difference between the heimdal port and the heimdal distributed
in the base:
$ ldd /usr/local/lib/libkrb5.so
/usr/local/lib/libkrb5.so:
libcrypto.so.3 => /lib/libcrypto.so.3 (0x281b3000)
libas
Hi!
Just a quick check - a client is getting a Proliant 380 G4 with a "6i" Raid
controller. Haven't used this hardware before. Will it work fine with
FreeBSD? Which version will work best, 5.4 or 4.11? Any peculiarities or
things to think about?
Any input appreciated!
Thanks
Palle
m0: Link is up 1000 Mbps Full Duplex
pflog0: promiscuous mode enabled
pid 64090 (squid), uid 0: exited on signal 6 (core dumped)
pid 75212 (squid), uid 0: exited on signal 6 (core dumped)
Palle Girgensohn wrote:
--On tisdag, juni 07, 2005 18.03.55 +0200 Kay Abendroth
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrot
--On tisdag, juni 07, 2005 22.08.42 +0100 Gray Lilley
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Did I read somewhere that you need PAE enabled for over 4GB of ram? I
could be horribly wrong, but my 0.02p worth :)
Either that or the amd64, yes. But without it, the system will not see all
the memory, and I'
--On tisdag, juni 07, 2005 18.03.55 +0200 Kay Abendroth
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
today I had another panic on my FreeBSD-Box. The last one occured 4 days
ago.
Please reply if sth. is missing.
Kind regards,
Kay
Hi!
What brand is your machine? Can you supply a dmesg?
/P
--On måndag, juni 06, 2005 19.57.03 -0400 Kris Kennaway
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 06:54:05PM -0500, Grooms, Matthew wrote:
My appologies. With the debug options listed in my previous post (
should have read 5.4 not 5.3 ), I got a lock order reversal. After a
while, it
Hi!
This is very similar to Brendan White problem just reported here. My guess
is it is the very same problem. I've reported the same problem on some
occasions before (although I use amd64, so my postings are to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]).
My system is also Dell 2850, dual CPUs, 3GB RAM, running amd
--On måndag, maj 23, 2005 10.30.47 +0200 Palle Girgensohn
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi!
We have an amd64 system that still experiences crashes after installing
5.4, mostly during high loads. (It's been unstable all the time, really;
see previous posts.)
I've added dumpde
Hi!
We have an amd64 system that still experiences crashes after installing
5.4, mostly during high loads. (It's been unstable all the time, really;
see previous posts.)
I've added dumpdev="/dev/amrd0s2b", and some time ago I did get coredumps,
but with latest versions of the kernel, savecor
--On söndag, april 24, 2005 08.11.06 -0600 Scott Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Palle Girgensohn wrote:
Hi!
on a 5.4-prerelease machine (dell 2850 dual cpu, running amd64), I have
this in rc.conf:
fsck_y_enable="YES"
background_fsck="NO"
Still, I'm not cer
--On söndag, april 24, 2005 11.25.31 -0700 Kris Kennaway
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sun, Apr 24, 2005 at 01:45:47PM +0200, Palle Girgensohn wrote:
...
BLK(S) MISSING IN BIT MAPS
SALVAGE? no
Running fsck on a mounted filesystem will do this unless you use
background fsck, becau
Hi!
on a 5.4-prerelease machine (dell 2850 dual cpu, running amd64), I have
this in rc.conf:
fsck_y_enable="YES"
background_fsck="NO"
Still, I'm not certain that fsck is really run at startup. At least,
running fsck on in multiuser reveals information like below, but perhaps
that is normal for
Hi!
We have a dual CPU Dell 2850 running fresh RELENG_5_4 (amd64). It reboots
sporadically, a few times per day! It has a rather high load, running php,
apache & postfix. Is anyone else experiencing any problems with this kind
of setup?
diff against GENERIC kernel is minor:
+# SMP
+options
--On torsdag, december 30, 2004 20.36.56 +0300 Igor Pokrovsky
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, Dec 29, 2004 at 04:38:23PM -0500, Paul Mather wrote:
Palle Girgensohn wrote:
> I've tried the UPDATING instructions, both locally and remotely (the
> latter failed ;-). But really,
--On onsdag, december 29, 2004 13.01.10 -0800 Brooks Davis
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, Dec 29, 2004 at 09:49:10PM +0100, Palle Girgensohn wrote:
--On onsdag, december 29, 2004 12.36.01 -0800 Brooks Davis
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 29, 2004 at 09:30:37
--On onsdag, december 29, 2004 12.36.01 -0800 Brooks Davis
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, Dec 29, 2004 at 09:30:37PM +0100, Palle Girgensohn wrote:
Has anyone managed to update a 4.10 system to 5.3 remotely, i.e. without
console access, and without spare disk partitions?
I have a bu
Hi!
Has anyone managed to update a 4.10 system to 5.3 remotely, i.e. without
console access, and without spare disk partitions?
I have a bunch of 4.10 machines that are too far away for me to actually do
the update hands on. I've tried it on a test machine, it fails half way
through installworl
--On lördag, november 06, 2004 20.39.23 +0300 Dmitry Morozovsky
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sat, 6 Nov 2004, [ISO-8859-1] Sebastian B?ck wrote:
SB> Ade Lovett wrote:
SB> > FYI. Prior to the postgresql new-world-order in ports/, I have now
tagged SB> > databases/postgresql72 (current version 7.
Well, I could consider upgrading if I can't find anything that works...
/Palle
--On fredag, mars 19, 2004 05.15.11 +0200 Evren Yurtesen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
oh sorry, I dont think it works in stable, you need 5.x and atheros
driver!
Palle Girgensohn wrote:
Hi,
Any tip
Hi,
Any tips for a PCI 802.11g NIC (not pc-card, this is *not* a laptop, it's a
regular tower machine). Preferably budget, but it must work in -stable.
Also, warnings about disfunct ones are appreciated.
Thanks,
Palle
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing lis
--On Wednesday, March 17, 2004 13:32:56 +0700 Eugene Grosbein
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Palle Girgensohn wrote:
Hi,
Any way to get OpenGL working w/ an ATI Radeon SE? I use a fresh FreeBSD
4-STABLE with XFree86-4.3.99. The kernel does not probe anything, dmesg |
egrep '(drm|agp|
Hi,
I've received a bunch of ASUS A7N8X-E deluxe together with Serial ATA hard
disks. I had planned to run 4.9 on this combo, but it seems the Serial ATA
support for this driver does not exist before 5.x or so. The controller is
a SiI 3112a from Silicon Image.
Is there any chance of backportin
Hi!
i read the thead a while back on udma.
here's something pretty strange. I have two disk, each on a
separate channel. Same controller (a rather old intel server
board, running with one (out of two possible) pentium pro.
The two disk are identical, bought together, and I use vinum with
them,
29 matches
Mail list logo
