gt; couldn't even spell IPv6 two weeks ago =-) Finally, I wanted to
> thank the NginX developers, they've done an amazing job supporting
> us.
>
On behalf of nginx team I'd like to thank you and all Netflix team for
the chance to work on such an interesting project
__
> freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
>
--
Maxim Konovalov
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
can give it a try on my "big server" (handles between 3000
> and 4000 connects a day...).
>
FWIW, we already running ipv6 cvsup server at cvsup4.ru.freebsd.org.
--
Maxim Konovalov
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lis
nding out more about the socket thats been created and what its
> clashing with might help. I'd do it myself but I'm not sure how to
> duplicate the issue.
>
Have you tried to turn net.inet.ip.portrange.randomized off?
--
Maxim Konovalov
__
eep mutex vm object (kernel object) r = 0 (0xc0a5dae0)
locked @ /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_bio.c:3573
On Tue, 10 Apr 2007, 10:43+0400, Maxim Konovalov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A week old -stable panic trace inlined below. The kernel config file
> is SMP + KDB/DDB options. Any help to debug futher is
x0033 in ?? ()
No symbol table info available.
gdb%
Script done on Tue Apr 10 10:33:02 2007
--
Maxim Konovalov
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
pr.cgi?pr=86655
> Unfortunately, it seems to have been forgotten.
> Can some of the committers have a look at it please ??
Fixed in HEAD. Will MFC the code to RELENG_6 in three weeks.
--
Maxim Konovalov
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
htt
On Fri, 10 Nov 2006, 11:09-, Ian Dowse wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Hans Petter Selasky writes:
> >On Friday 10 November 2006 10:08, Maxim Konovalov wrote:
> >> The second question: is it OK to commit uark(4) as is and then convert
> >> it to the
to:
>
> Make a config thread, from where you do the configuration. You should not call
> usbd_do_request() directly from the ucom callbacks!
>
> Add config for the USB BULK transfers needed.
>
> And a little more.
Thanks for the tips!
&g
Hi Hans,
On Fri, 10 Nov 2006, 08:38+0100, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> On Thursday 09 November 2006 18:29, Maxim Konovalov wrote:
> > [ iedowse CC'ed ]
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > On Fri, 5 May 2006, 11:04-0400, David Coder wrote:
> > > thx for the sug
diff
http://maxim.int.ru/stuff/uark.diff.6
Ian, could you please review the patches?
TIA!
--
Maxim Konovalov
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
On Fri, 13 Oct 2006, 10:50-0400, Ernest Natiello wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-10-13 at 14:25 +0400, Maxim Konovalov wrote:
> > Gentlemen, sorry I interrupt you. What version of FreeBSD is that?
> > If it something < RELENG_6 you should consider to upgrade to it. I
> > believe
ing to set... sopt_valsize is 0.
>
> Which port/package/software does tcpserver program belong to?
Gentlemen, sorry I interrupt you. What version of FreeBSD is that?
If it something < RELENG_6 you should consider to upgrade to it. I
believe this panic was
e might also one day be able to keep up with me on a snowboard, but
> we'll just have to wait and see.
>
> So, like, now you all know each other, and stuff, so, like, try to get
> along, m-kay?
>
> Scott
But.. how is Scott??
--
Maxim Konovalov
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
d way to write them and no
infrastructure to run and report results. E.g. at the moment you
can't cd /usr/src/tools/regression/ && make.
Perhaps we just need to steal NetBSD's bits until we invent something
better.
Btw, there i
mary.cgi?text=jail
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/89528
--
Maxim Konovalov
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
On Sat, 17 Jun 2006, 17:23-0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Sat, 17 Jun 2006, Maxim Konovalov wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 17 Jun 2006, 16:44-0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Jun 17 16:00:03 pluto kernel: kern.ipc.maxpipekva exceeded; see tuning(7
is is a hard limit on the amount of pageable
* address space available to us in pipe_map. This value is normally
* autotuned, but may also be loader tuned.
*
* kern.ipc.pipekva - This read-only sysctl tracks the current amount of
* memory in use by pi
s bugs before 6.2 ?
> I personally promise to help with testing and discussing things.
Why don't you just commit these fixes?
--
Maxim Konovalov
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
his? I can happily supply an image that
> causes the problem if someone wants to try it.
Known problem. Were discussed severeal times in the past (e.g.
subject "vnode_pager_putpages errors" in -stable).
--
Maxim Konovalov
___
freebs
p://www.freebsd.org/releases/5.3R/errata.html
--
Maxim Konovalov
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
> Saw this however FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE-p6 #2: Thu Mar 31 01:50:41
> BST 2005 is giving unknown option "IPFIREWALL_FORWARD_EXTENDED"
You need RELENG_5 or RELENG_5_4, not RELENG_5_3.
--
Maxim Konovalov
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.
atadisk.ko and atapicd.ko still do not depend on atapci.ko. So if you
don't ask to load atapci.ko in loader.conf you will get a panic
because the kernel won't find the root fs. I added MODULE_DEPEND() on
atapci macro to ata-disk.c and this solved the prob
On Wed, 2 Feb 2005, 13:09+0900, Yoshiaki Kasahara wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Could anyone please review kern/71910 and kern/73129 to fix IPFW
> behavior before 5.4R? I have trouble using ipfw for output interface
> selection after migrated to 5.x...
AFAIK andre@ is working on t
ckusick's answer:
http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=100639+0+archive/2003/freebsd-current/20030323.freebsd-current
Dan's PR:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=misc/58373
--
Maxim Konovalov, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
t.
>
> If it seems to work for people, I'll talk to re@ about getting this in
> before 4.9 goes out the door.
It seems it works. I am running my usuall stress tests now, thanks a
lot. patch(1)-friendly diff is there:
http://people.freebsd.org/~maxim/diff/cam.sysctl.stable
On Wed, 27 Aug 2003, 12:56-0700, Colin Percival wrote:
> At 23:42 27/08/2003 +0400, Maxim Konovalov wrote:
> >On Wed, 27 Aug 2003, 13:34-0500, Mike Silbersack wrote:
> > > So, I think we'll just include a warning with 4.9:
> > >
> > > WARNING!
> >
with INVARIANTS?)
>
> So, I think we'll just include a warning with 4.9:
>
> WARNING!
>
> Do not attempt to stress a FreeBSD 4.9 machine if you:
or "Upgrade your FreeBSD to RedHat".
> a) Will be swapping whatsoever
> or
> b) Will be taking a nap while
Polina asked me to forward her letter to -stable because she doesn't
have a reverse name resolution for her ip address at the moment and
can't send it to the maillist herself
--
Maxim Konovalov, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Fri, 2
On 06:12+0400, Oct 23, 2002, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> Maxim Konovalov wrote:
>
> > > > A patch below fixes an incorrect logic in remove_dyn_rule() which
> > > > produces that famous message "OUCH! cannot remove rule..". The second
> > > >
30 matches
Mail list logo
