On 1/6/20 6:04 PM, Kevin Oberman wrote:
On Mon, Jan 6, 2020 at 1:17 PM Alexander Koeppe wrote:
Hi,
since I've upgraded to FreeBSD 12, I don't find a package providing the
lightweight geoip database API incl. GeoIP.h and libGeoIP.so.
I only find `geoipupdate` which is the non-free variant of
On 11/6/19 4:04 PM, George Michaelson wrote:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239876 is relevant maybe?
I suspect a separate bug because the OP specified that it worked in
12.0 where those bugs go back to 9.x
Julian.
On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 9:46 AM Julian Elischer wrote
On 11/6/19 2:53 PM, Warner Losh wrote:
On Wed, Nov 6, 2019 at 2:03 PM Chris Ross wrote:
On Wed, Nov 06, 2019 at 02:17:11PM -0500, Chris Ross wrote:
Hi there. I tried booting FreeBSD-12.1-RELEASE-amd64-disc1.iso on a
[...]
I need to do? How has 12.1 changed w.r.t. 12.0 for UEFI?
More info
On 11/6/19 2:58 PM, James Wright wrote:
Hi,
[...]
Can anyone offer some advice as to how I can track down this issue?
The first question which I couldn't see from your dmesg is "do you
have ht krnel debugger configured into your kernel?"
___
free
On 14/5/18 11:48 pm, Patrick M. Hausen wrote:
Hi!
Am 14.05.2018 um 17:35 schrieb Patrick M. Hausen :
Possibly we are on the wrong track altogether.
We were - please just forget it ...
Isn't it a fact that you will always discover your own problem
immediately after posting for help from the
On 7/3/18 3:19 am, John Baldwin wrote:
On Monday, March 05, 2018 08:19:24 AM Daniel Eischen wrote:
On Mon, 5 Mar 2018, Trond Endrest�l wrote:
On Sat, 3 Mar 2018 18:09+0100, Holm Tiffe wrote:
can anyone get ddd get to work in 11.1-R or stable?
I've more or less given up on devel/ddd, since i
On 28/4/18 8:46 pm, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
Hi,
I upgraded a server from 10.4 to 11.1 and now al of a sudden the
server complains about:
ZFS: Can't find pool by guid
And I end up in the boot prompt:
lsdev gives disk0 withe on p1 the partion that the zroot is/was.
This is an active ser
On 7/4/18 10:21 pm, Peter wrote:
Julian Elischer wrote:
for a single CPU you really should compile a kernel with SMP turned
off
and 4BSD scheduler.
ULE is just trying too hard to do stuff you don't need.
Julian,
if we agree on this, I am fine.
(This implies that SCHED_4BSD will *no
On 4/4/18 9:32 pm, George Mitchell wrote:
On 04/04/18 06:39, Alban Hertroys wrote:
[...]
That said, SCHED_ULE (the default scheduler for quite a while now) was designed
with multi-CPU configurations in mind and there are claims that SCHED_4BSD
works better for single-CPU configurations. You ma
On 6/9/17 7:02 pm, Pete French wrote:
We recently moved our software from 11.0-p9 to 11.1-p1, but looks
like there
is a regression in 11.1-p1 running on HyperV (Windows/HyperV 2012
R2) where
the virtual hn0 interface hangs with the following kernel messages:
hn0: on vmbus0
hn0: Ethernet a
On 22/8/17 2:54 am, Julian Elischer wrote:
On 22/8/17 2:13 am, Ian Smith wrote:
Speaking of mirrors, just for Antipodeans:
> https://download.freebsd.org/ftp/releases/ISO-IMAGES/10.4/
is very slow (~100KB/s) from here tonight - must be your eclipse? -
but
ftp://ftp3.au.freebsd.org/
On 22/8/17 2:13 am, Ian Smith wrote:
Speaking of mirrors, just for Antipodeans:
> https://download.freebsd.org/ftp/releases/ISO-IMAGES/10.4/
is very slow (~100KB/s) from here tonight - must be your eclipse? - but
ftp://ftp3.au.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/ISO-IMAGES/10.4/
delivered bo
On 22/5/17 3:04 pm, Harry Schmalzbauer wrote:
Bezüglich Harry Schmalzbauer's Nachricht vom 21.05.2017 20:25 (localtime):
Mk&bsd.ports.mk still tells:
# PACKAGES - A top level directory where all packages go
(rather than
# going locally to each por
On 1/5/17 5:53 pm, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
On Mon, 1 May 2017, Mark Millard wrote:
and that mkheaders does more than just fixinc.sh
as far as changing headers goes, such as limits.h
and gsyslmits.h and syslimits.h .
That's a good point, and I guess the *limits.h files do make
sense to come from t
On 8/4/17 7:01 pm, Edward Tomasz Napierała wrote:
On 0313T1206, Pete French wrote:
I have a number of machines in Azure, all booting from ZFS and, until
the weekend, running 10.3 perfectly happily.
I started upgrading these to 11. The first went fine, the second would
not boot. Looking at the b
this was a bug in 10.3 that I thought was fixed in 11.. I believe it's
fixed in 10-stable. Maybe 11.0 missed it?
if you still see this bug look at adding the patch in bug
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208882
it makes the mountroot code retry, which is all you need.
Juli
Tracked this down to a rogue copy of libc.so in an unexpected place
which was being found earlier than the real one.
On 30/1/17 1:13 am, Julian Elischer wrote:
Hi
the linker script /usr/lib/libc.so fails when you are using the
--sysroot options because it
contains absolute paths.
Does
Hi
the linker script /usr/lib/libc.so fails when you are using the
--sysroot options because it
contains absolute paths.
Does anyone know if there is a way to add the sysroot to the script?
currently teh on ein our sysroot looks like:
$ cat /usr/build/buildroot/tools/x86_FBSD1X_gcc4.2.4/us
Does this ring any bells?
even a theory would be a big improvement.
memcpy+0xc
mpt_read_cfg_page+0xcc
mpt_cation+0x148e
xpt_action_default+0x7e
cam_periph_runccb+0x7c
passdoioctl+0x719
passioctl+0x30
devfs_ioctl_f+0x7c
kern_ioctl+0x1a8
sys_ioctl+0x11f
amd64_syscall+0x3f9
xfast_syscall+0xf7
we se
On 8/10/2016 5:36 AM, Oliver Pinter wrote:
On 10/5/16, Julian Elischer wrote:
In 11 and 12 the taskqueue code has been rewritten in this area but
under 10 this bug still occurs.
On our appliances this bug stops the system from mounting the ZFS
root, so it is quite severe.
Basically while the
Please review..
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D8160
Direct fix for stable/10 as bug is not present in 11+ in this form.
Julian
On 4/10/2016 8:06 PM, Julian Elischer wrote:
In 11 and 12 the taskqueue code has been rewritten in this area but
under 10 this bug still occurs.
On our appliances
In 11 and 12 the taskqueue code has been rewritten in this area but
under 10 this bug still occurs.
On our appliances this bug stops the system from mounting the ZFS
root, so it is quite severe.
Basically while the thread is sleeping during the ZFS mount of root
(in the while loop), another th
On 17/06/2016 3:16 PM, Jason Zhang wrote:
Hi,
I am working on storage service based on FreeBSD. I look forward to a good
result because many professional storage company use FreeBSD as its OS. But I
am disappointed with the Bad performance. I tested the the performance of LSI
MegaRAID 9260
On 19/04/2016 8:49 PM, Aijaz Baig wrote:
Hello
I think the title says it all!! :)
I would like to know if there is indeed a way to toggle between gdb
and ddb while debugging a remote kernel. I am already at the gdb (or
rather kgdb) prompt. From here how do I switch to local ddb on the
debugged
On 22/01/2016 10:31 PM, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
The HPN and None cipher patches have been removed from FreeBSD-CURRENT.
I intend to remove them from FreeBSD-STABLE this weekend.
The HPN patches were of limited usefulness and required a great deal of
effort to maintain in our tree. The None c
On 23/12/2015 1:05 AM, Garrett Wollman wrote:
The consensus when I asked seemed to be that VIMAGE+jail was the right
combination to give every container its own private loopback
interface, so I tried to build that. I noticed a few things:
1) The kernel prints out a warning message at boot time
On 7/27/15 10:32 PM, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
On 27/07/2015 16:25, Glen Barber wrote:
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 04:14:54PM +0200, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
On 27/07/2015 04:39, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
* Separated email services (and single-point-of-failure cases) from
the machine that h
On 4/11/13 5:18 PM, Andre Oppermann wrote:
Excuse me for being slightly spammy but I've received feedback that we
haven't spread this information widely enough outside the inner circles
and interested people missed the announcement.
EuroBSDcon 2013: September 28-29 in Malta
=
On 3/2/12 10:21 AM, Doug Barton wrote:
On 03/02/2012 03:44, K. Macy wrote:
not sure who wrote:
Correct. However, I'm not sure the analogy is flawed. I am, to some
degree, guilty of the same sin. I now run Ubuntu and have never had a
single problem keeping my package system up date, in stark c
On Friday 17 February 2012 06:28 am, David Xu wrote:
On 2012/2/17 16:06, Julian Elischer wrote:
On 2/16/12 11:41 PM, Julian Elischer wrote:
adding jkim as he seems to be the last person working with TSC.
On 2/16/12 6:42 PM, David Xu wrote:
On 2012/2/17 10:19, Julian Elischer wrote:
On 2/16
On 2/17/12 3:28 AM, David Xu wrote:
On 2012/2/17 16:06, Julian Elischer wrote:
On 2/16/12 11:41 PM, Julian Elischer wrote:
adding jkim as he seems to be the last person working with TSC.
On 2/16/12 6:42 PM, David Xu wrote:
On 2012/2/17 10:19, Julian Elischer wrote:
On 2/16/12 5:56 PM
On 2/16/12 11:41 PM, Julian Elischer wrote:
adding jkim as he seems to be the last person working with TSC.
On 2/16/12 6:42 PM, David Xu wrote:
On 2012/2/17 10:19, Julian Elischer wrote:
On 2/16/12 5:56 PM, David Xu wrote:
On 2012/2/17 8:42, Julian Elischer wrote:
Adding David Xu for his
adding jkim as he seems to be the last person working with TSC.
On 2/16/12 6:42 PM, David Xu wrote:
On 2012/2/17 10:19, Julian Elischer wrote:
On 2/16/12 5:56 PM, David Xu wrote:
On 2012/2/17 8:42, Julian Elischer wrote:
Adding David Xu for his thoughts since he reqrote the code in
quesiton
On 2/16/12 5:56 PM, David Xu wrote:
On 2012/2/17 8:42, Julian Elischer wrote:
Adding David Xu for his thoughts since he reqrote the code in
quesiton in revision 213098
On 2/16/12 2:57 PM, Julian Elischer wrote:
On 2/16/12 1:06 PM, Julian Elischer wrote:
On 2/16/12 9:34 AM, Andriy Gapon
kern.timecounter.tick: 1
kern.timecounter.choice: TSC-low(1000) i8254(0) HPET(950)
ACPI-fast(900) dummy(-100)
kern.timecounter.hardware: ACPI-fast
kern.timecounter.stepwarnings: 0
switching the machine from TSC_low to ACPI-fast fixes the problem.
in 8.x it used to default to ACPI
but I u
Adding David Xu for his thoughts since he reqrote the code in quesiton
in revision 213098
On 2/16/12 2:57 PM, Julian Elischer wrote:
On 2/16/12 1:06 PM, Julian Elischer wrote:
On 2/16/12 9:34 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 15/02/2012 23:41 Julian Elischer said the following:
The program fio (an
On 2/16/12 1:06 PM, Julian Elischer wrote:
On 2/16/12 9:34 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 15/02/2012 23:41 Julian Elischer said the following:
The program fio (an IO test in ports) uses pthreads
the following code (from fio-2.0.3, but its in earlier code too)
has suddenly started misbehaving
On 2/16/12 1:27 AM, Sergey Kandaurov wrote:
On 16 February 2012 12:58, Julian Elischer wrote:
I just noticed that lately in 9.x and maybe 8-Stable, dmesg seems to return
nothing if
there is active logging going on. I saw someone else refer to this as well.
Has this been reported?
Didn'
On 2/16/12 9:34 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 15/02/2012 23:41 Julian Elischer said the following:
The program fio (an IO test in ports) uses pthreads
the following code (from fio-2.0.3, but its in earlier code too)
has suddenly started misbehaving.
clock_gettime(CLOCK_REALTIME,&a
I just noticed that lately in 9.x and maybe 8-Stable, dmesg seems to
return nothing if
there is active logging going on. I saw someone else refer to this as
well.
Has this been reported?
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.free
The program fio (an IO test in ports) uses pthreads
the following code (from fio-2.0.3, but its in earlier code too)
has suddenly started misbehaving.
clock_gettime(CLOCK_REALTIME, &t);
t.tv_sec += seconds + 10;
pthread_mutex_lock(&mutex->lock);
while (!mutex->v
On 2/14/12 4:20 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 03:35:01PM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
On 2/14/12 10:38 AM, Kevin Oberman wrote:
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 12:23 AM, Julian Elischer wrote:
Has anyone else seen a problem with top -H -S?
after a short while the screen gets
On 2/14/12 10:38 AM, Kevin Oberman wrote:
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 12:23 AM, Julian Elischer wrote:
Has anyone else seen a problem with top -H -S?
after a short while the screen gets more and more corrupted..
hitting ^L or turning off S& H modes helps .. for a while.
If this is a k
On 2/14/12 7:43 AM, Ian Smith wrote:
On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 2:37:55 +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> Here is what I got, the first column is the number of requests, the second
> what is requested, and the 3rd my comments (basically it means, if there
is a
> comment, it is not needed/pos
Has anyone else seen a problem with top -H -S?
after a short while the screen gets more and more corrupted..
hitting ^L or turning off S & H modes helps .. for a while.
If this is a known fixed problem, let me know but I need to
co-ordinate with others
to upgrade the machine in question.
Ju
On 2/9/12 10:24 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 04:02:12PM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
On 2/9/12 1:56 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 01:48:29PM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
does anyone know of problems with freebsd and this system?
the kernel We
does anyone know of problems with freebsd and this system?
the kernel We tried to boot seems to stop somewhere in the ahci probing.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, sen
On 2/7/12 1:50 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 06/02/2012 07:52 Julian Elischer said the following:
so if I'm sitting still in the debugger for too long, a hardclock
event happens that goes into ULE, which then hits the following KASSERT.
KASSERT(pri>= PRI_MIN_BATC
so if I'm sitting still in the debugger for too long, a hardclock
event happens that goes into ULE, which then hits the following KASSERT.
KASSERT(pri >= PRI_MIN_BATCH && pri <= PRI_MAX_BATCH,
("sched_priority: invalid priority %d: nice %d, "
On 2/5/12 3:05 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 05/02/2012 09:58 Julian Elischer said the following:
In 9.x ( can't check -current, but teh mailing list has a better readership)
I'm still seeing this and have still not found any solution:
possible reasons for the change may be:
1/ change
ules?
any guidance would be appreciated..
The reason I can get away with using FreeBSD ar work is because I can
debug modules well
as in Linux this is generally a problem.. Now I see similar breakage
in freebsd. (sigh)).
I really don't know where to start looking for this..
Julian
On 2/3/12 1
On 12/28/11 12:58 AM, Marin Atanasov Nikolov wrote:
Hello,
Today I've managed to escape from a jail by accident and ended up with
root access to the host's filesystem.
Here's what I did:
* Using ezjail for managing my jails
* Verified in FreeBSD 9.0-BETA3 and 9.0-RC3
* This works only wh
On 11/18/10 3:37 PM, Alexander Best wrote:
On Fri Nov 19 10, Daniel Nebdal wrote:
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 12:06 AM, Alexander Kabaev wrote:
On Thu, 18 Nov 2010 18:56:35 +
Alexander Best wrote:
On Thu Nov 18 10, Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 06:23:24PM + I heard t
On 11/18/10 10:55 AM, Lucius Windschuh wrote:
2010/11/18 Andriy Gapon:
[Grouping of processes into TTY groups]
Well, I think that those improvements apply only to a very specific usage
pattern
and are greatly over-hyped.
But there are serious issue if you use FreeBSD as a desktop OS with
SMP
On 5/28/10 3:54 AM, Giulio Ferro wrote:
On 28.05.2010 07:46, Giulio Ferro wrote:
Would it be a good idea to try netgraph bridge?
Or the underlying implementation is the same as in if_bridge?
netgraph bridging (see /usr/share/examples/netgraph) is a completely
different implimentation with diff
On 4/26/10 1:11 AM, Stefan Esser wrote:
Am 22.04.2010 20:43, schrieb Marin Atanasov:
Hello,
Thanks a lot for the patch, Qing!
It works fine. However I've noticed one thing, after I start mpd5 and
connect to my home network:
kernel: WARNING: attempt to domain_add(netgraph) after domainfinalize
Xin LI wrote:
Hi,
A friend of mine has encountered some problem in his setup which
consists a pair of GRE peer, one running on OpenBSD and another
running FreeBSD 7.2-RELEASE; with 7.2-STABLE, there is no improvement
over the situation. The problem we have observed seems to be related
to GRE pa
Oliver Lehmann wrote:
Markus Hitter wrote:
If you throw the EHCI driver out of the kernel your drive will use
either OHCI or UHCI (both are slow). This seems to help, at least for
the limited things I use this pen drive now.
I'm not sure, that this g_vfs_done is related to the panic. I've
Stephen Clark wrote:
Stephen Clark wrote:
10.0.129.1 FreeBSD workstation
^
|
| ethernet
|
v
10.0.128.1 Freebsd FW "A"
^
|
| gre / ipsec
|
v
192.168.3.1 FreeBSD FW "B"
^
|
| ethernet
|
v
192.168.3.86 linux workstation
Also just using gre's without the
underlying ipsec tunnel
Kevin Oberman wrote:
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 13:38:38 -0400
From: Mikhail Teterin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello!
A machine I manage remotely for a friend comes under a distributed ssh
break-in attack every once in a while. Annoyed (and alarmed) by the
messages like:
Aug
So, I tried out PCBSD on a Dell "DHP" (what ever that is) (made feb '05).
it installs great
but when I run boot it, (FreeBSD comes up fine) teh X server goes into
an infinite loop somewhere.
168 root 1 00 148M 6976K rdnrel 0:57 93.85% Xorg
and the screen stays black.
the
Joe Peterson wrote:
Julian Elischer wrote:
it could be an old file..
what kind of disks?
It's a Seagate ST3500630A parallel ATA drive.
I had a scenario where 3ware controllers were just failing to write to
a drive in the array, so old data showed through.
I have an Intel ICH4 contr
Joe Peterson wrote:
Chris Dillon wrote:
That is a chunk of a Mozilla Mork-format database. Perhaps the
Firefox URL history or address book from Thunderbird.
Interesting (thanks to all who recognized Mork). I do use Firefox and
Thunderbird, so it's feasible, but how the heck would a piece of
David G Lawrence wrote:
In any case, it appears that my patch is a no-op, at least for the
problem I was trying to solve. This has me confused, however, because at
one point the problem was mitigated with it. The patch has gone through
several iterations, however, and it could be that it was mad
cpghost wrote:
On Sun, 09 Dec 2007 14:01:27 -0800
Julian Elischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
cpghost wrote:
On Sun, 09 Dec 2007 11:13:13 -0800
Julian Elischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
--- manually restarting ppp(1), then:
17:10:47.306928 00:00
Adding brian to CC list.
Alexander Motin wrote:
cpghost wrote:
I think such behaviour can take place if ppp daemon for some reason
don't waits for reply but closes session immediately after sending
connect request. If it so it also explains original "no matching
session" errors as for the an
cpghost wrote:
On Sun, 09 Dec 2007 11:13:13 -0800
Julian Elischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
--- manually restarting ppp(1), then:
17:10:47.306928 00:00:24:c2:45:74 > ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff, ethertype
PPPoE D (0x8863), length 32: PPPoE PADI [Host-Uniq 0
cpghost wrote:
On Sun, 09 Dec 2007 11:13:13 -0800
Julian Elischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
cpghost wrote:
On Thu, 6 Dec 2007 16:11:07 +0100
cpghost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 06 Dec 2007 13:57:16 +0200
Alexander Motin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
cpghost wrot
cpghost wrote:
On Thu, 6 Dec 2007 16:11:07 +0100
cpghost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 06 Dec 2007 13:57:16 +0200
Alexander Motin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
cpghost wrote:
The problem is that the last mile carrier of the PPP provider
that this router is attached to disconnects the ppp s
This diff is a partial MFC (picking parts out of -current)
that makes aio_return() return the error return of a completed AIO
request. (as it does on othe OS's and in 7.x).
The man page for 6.x and other OS's indicate that aio_return
shoud return all the same results as a returning read() or
Jan Srzednicki wrote:
On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 10:22:08AM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
Jan Srzednicki wrote:
Hello,
I have a pair of hosts. One of them performs a massive amount of
TCP connections to the other one, all to the same port. This setup
mostly works fine, but from time to time (that
Jan Srzednicki wrote:
Hello,
I have a pair of hosts. One of them performs a massive amount of
TCP connections to the other one, all to the same port. This setup
mostly works fine, but from time to time (that varies, from once a
minute to one a half an hour), the connect(2) syscall fails with
EA
Mike Tancsa wrote:
At 12:33 PM 11/2/2007, Jack Vogel wrote:
So at this point I'm unclear, with my reposting of if_em.c last
night has everyone seen both parts or do I have to try something
else?
I never saw a .c file
so put them in ~/public_html on freefall
and they can be accessed as:
http
Julian Elischer wrote:
Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
Julian Elischer пишет:
somewhere between my MFC testing and the commits there seems to have
been a screwup.
I think it happenned because I reverted a MFC out of my list of MFC's
to do after
I had done some tests because they causled a fa
Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
Julian Elischer пишет:
somewhere between my MFC testing and the commits there seems to have
been a screwup.
I think it happenned because I reverted a MFC out of my list of MFC's
to do after
I had done some tests because they causled a failure and I hadn't
Mike Tancsa wrote:
At 10:07 AM 4/1/2007, JoaoBR wrote:
it seems I can not add pipes with releng6 sources from the last days
ipfw add pipe 1 ip from any to any
ipfw: getsockopt(IP_FW_ADD): Invalid argument
I think this is whats needed in /usr/src/sbin/ipfw. Looking at the
diffs between HEAD
JoaoBR wrote:
On Sunday 01 April 2007 15:22, Mike Tancsa wrote:
At 11:55 AM 4/1/2007, JoaoBR wrote:
by all respect to Julians work but with ipfw broken and sunday fucked up
...
kind of scaring when seeing "I have no time to check, I do it on tuesday"
or "I need to do the userland ipfw too to a
David Wolfskill wrote:
On Sat, Mar 31, 2007 at 02:27:56AM -0600, Rick C. Petty wrote:
Is anyone else experiencing build problems with the latest RELENG_6 (sup'd
as of 2007-Mar-31 0800 UTC)?
A buildworld failed at:
===> sbin/ipfw (all)
...
Right; I encountered the same thing.
Locally reverti
Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, Oct 01, 2006 at 12:30:22AM -0700, FreeBSD Security Officer wrote:
Users of FreeBSD 4.11 systems are also reminded that that FreeBSD 4.11
will reach its End of Life at the end of January 2007 and that they
should be making plans to upgrade or replace such sys
Kip Macy wrote:
I've seen this when running stress2 with a large number of
incarnations. Why don't we return an error to the user?
programmer ENOTIME
patch welcome!
-Kip
On 9/1/06, Julian Elischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Vyacheslav Vovk wrote:
can
Vyacheslav Vovk wrote:
can you see how many threads thre are in the system?
I think you will have to extract this information frome the zone allocator.
I just realised there is no effective limit on kernel threads in the system.
probably one could cause this with a fork bomb appoach using forks
Someone mentionned that you can't reach the smbus on ASUS boards.
That's because they turn it off in the BIOS. They turn it on and off as
they
need to read stuff for their SMI (well on some of their boards at least).
you can turn it on again using pciconf. but I forget the exact incantation.
(
Scott Long wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
It is my great pleasure and privilege to announce the availability of
FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE. This release is the next step in the development
of the 6.X branc
Robert Watson wrote:
On Tue, 4 Apr 2006, Peter Jeremy wrote:
On Mon, 2006-Apr-03 16:34:59 +0100, Robert Watson wrote:
(2) The name space model for system v ipc is flat, so while it's
desirable
to
allow the administrator in the host environment to monitor and
control
resource use in
Robert Watson wrote:
On Mon, 3 Apr 2006, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/48471
[kernel] [patch] new feature: private IPC for every jail
Its an ancient, 4.x patch for having private IPC in a jail ... not
sure how hard it would be to bring it up to 6.x
has anyone used IPMI (BMC) with x346 and FreeBSD successful?
Today i've configured with bmc_cfg.exe all BMC options and when server
is in DOS mode i can log in to it and reboot it. But when FBSD stand
up connection to BMC is lost.
In IBM help desk some technicans told me: "BMC works only on l
sebastian ssmoller wrote:
just FYI ...
regards,
seb
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2005 10:24:57 +0200
From: sebastian ssmoller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Massive sound changes / fix (24/32bit pcm support, new
sampling rate converter, various fixes)
hi,
Wilko Bulte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
If you give me $5 per Unix system found there I can retire here and now.
For financial transaction processing, and the customer's accounts? I
hope it's not my bank.. mkb.
Hmmm we processed something over a trillion dollars in bank backends
Joe Altman wrote:
On Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 01:40:50PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
Since I can't make this happen here, I'm going to need help..
What do you need? Relatively speaking, I'm sort of a newbie at the
more complex aspects of bugs, and this strikes me as somewhat
Since I can't make this happen here, I'm going to need help..
Joe Altman wrote:
Apr 27 00:07 /usr/src/sys/dev/usb/usb.c
/* Explore USB busses at the end of device configuration. */
Static void
usb_cold_explore(void *arg)
{
struct usb_softc *sc;
can you add this line here:
printf("H
Joe Altman wrote:
On Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 12:55:31PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
Can you confirm that usb.c ends with:
SYSINIT(usb_cold_explore, SI_SUB_INT_CONFIG_HOOKS, SI_ORDER_FIRST,
usb_cold_explore, NULL);
/usr/src/sys/dev/usb/usb.c
^^^
Where does
Joe Altman wrote:
On Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 11:23:14AM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
[...]
I assume it works right if you remove the mouse before booting and reinsert
it after the kernel has booted?
Yes; once I have a console, the mouse is detected:
ums0: Logitech USB Receiver, rev
Joe Altman wrote:
On Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 11:23:14AM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
+++
Currently, I find my P4 hanging just after discovering the parallel
port and mounting disk; in other words, just here:
ppc0: parallel port not found.
ad0: 28629MB [58168/16/63] at ata0-master UDMA100
but
Julian Elischer wrote:
+++
Currently, I find my P4 hanging just after discovering the parallel
port and mounting disk; in other words, just here:
but ->only<- when my Logitech USB mouse is plugged in. Now, if I
unplug it and hit reset (not Ctrl-Alt-Del; the keyboard is frozen) the
system
+++
Currently, I find my P4 hanging just after discovering the parallel
port and mounting disk; in other words, just here:
ppc0: parallel port not found.
ad0: 28629MB [58168/16/63] at ata0-master UDMA100
but ->only<- when my Logitech USB mouse is plugged in. Now, if I
unplug it and hit reset (not
Julian Elischer wrote:
You'll find a diff at:
http://www.freebsd.org/~julian/usb-4.diff
This merges a lot of the USB infrastructure.
I was amazed how little changing had to be done
to allow this to work on 4.x.
The files become almost teh same as on -current.
(minus small changes here and
You'll find a diff at:
http://www.freebsd.org/~julian/usb-4.diff
This merges a lot of the USB infrastructure.
I was amazed how little changing had to be done
to allow this to work on 4.x.
The files become almost teh same as on -current.
(minus small changes here and there)
if you use USB on 4.x, pl
I have just merged in most of the lowest level changes to 4.x from 6.x.
If you use USB on 4.x machines and are planning on following RELENG_4
then I suggest you test the latest sources to avoid nasty surprises later.
I will probably merge some of the actual device drivers as well, though
I have
li
I have just merged a set of changes from current to RELENG_4 for usb audio.
USB audio in 4.x was not terribly well supported anyhow, but if you are
running
RELENG_4 and have a usb audio output device (input may not work, yet)
you might
like to do a "before and after" test.I have limited USB
Well to be more precise.. under a 4.8-level set of other packages.
you need guile 1.6 and that pulls in half of gnome (why?)
and tons of othe rstuff and in teh end nothing seems
to compile/work any more :-/
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http
1 - 100 of 128 matches
Mail list logo
