> Thank you all for your generous info on encryption. Hmmm, now I don't
> know what Microsoft actually meant when they advertised Windows NT, 2000
> was "Truly Secure"!
It meant, believe us in all we say and do! Give us your money because you
will believe whatever we say
It's all "advertis
Hmm, that's interesting. I cvsup'd at ~4AM yesterday, updated my source
from my repos., did a buildworld, and just now did an installworld of it
and I had no problems.
--
Close your eyes. Now forget what you see. What do you feel? --
My heart. -- Come here. -- Your heart. -- See? We're e
I had similar trouble, but can burn under windows (except 2k which is
buggy)
j.
--
Close your eyes. Now forget what you see. What do you feel? --
My heart. -- Come here. -- Your heart. -- See? We're exactly the same.
Jon Smith -- Senior Math Major @ Purdue
On Sat, 19 Aug 2000, M
I think the purpose is to cause the kernel builds and installs to work
right. I would HOPE everyone could agree on that as a "purpose."
Some people have made suggestions such as, "if you're using the same
system, (ie. the -RELEASE people), don't require a whole buildowrld..."
Why not accept th
> My $0.02: I thinks it's a good idea for /etc/defaults/whatever to set the
> defaults and then load any customizations for /etc/whatever. Personally, I
> *like* having small /etc/whatever files with just my entries to worry about.
> And if we call defaults from the /etc copy, you have to first h
I, personally, have no need of /etc/defaults and typically disable it,
anyway.
Since the whole thing is environment variables, why not make /etc/rc.conf
and /etc/make.conf _include_ the ones in /etc/defaults (first thing in the
file) (if they exist, obviously)? At which point, those of us who do
Personally, I've always LOVED simply setting options for the system in
rc.conf and make.conf They are all listed, and I just change the ones
I want. I hate haveing to look through LOTS of files for this that or the
other config option.
At the same time, I agree, it's a pain to go 'grep'n a
CC'd to ports where it belongs.
(Please respond only there as I don't think this is a -stable issue).
I'd like to suggest they add this to the messages that says to hadd the
handler lines, it certainly would have saved me grief -- and you.
I had the same problems (and a few worse ones).
To get
