On 6/23/2018 1:27 PM, David Samms wrote:
> There is a regression in 11.2-RC3 that effects the igb driver for Intels
> C2000 SoC I354 Quad GbE Controller
>
> Supermicro A1SRi-2558F
> http://www.supermicro.com/products/motherboard/Atom/X10/A1SRi-2558F.cfm
>
> This server has run 10.x and 11.x fine
The DHCP client, dhclient, in 11.2 was changed to support server-side
MTU ( https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206721 ), but
this MTU feature being enabled by default causes an unexpected change in
behavior on upgrade, which to me is a POLA violation.
My ISP sends a bogus MTU
On 2/15/2013 10:45 AM, Karl Denninger wrote:
> On 2/15/2013 9:37 AM, Kurt Lidl wrote:
>>
>> Hmm.
>>
>> I've got IPSEC tunnels from Windows XP and Windows 7 working
>> to a FreeBSD 8.3 host, using NAT/T.
>>
>> I'm using the Shrewsoft client: http://www.shrew.net/software
>>
>> -Kurt
>> _
On 8/30/2012 9:53 AM, Stas Verberkt wrote:
>> I spent a little time today setting up an SVN mirror after reading this
>> thread and wrote up a how-to for those looking to do the same.
>>
>> http://www.pingle.org/2012/08/24/freebsd-svn-mirror
>>
>> Comments/Flames/Corrections welcome...
>>
> Just wo
On 8/23/2012 11:43 AM, Ian Lepore wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-08-23 at 11:17 -0400, Ken Menzel wrote:
>>
>> I found two good primers:
>> http://mebsd.com/configure-freebsd-servers/update-freebsd-source-tree-using-subversion-svn.html
>> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/articles/committers-guide/article.html#
On 5/31/2012 5:31 PM, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
> On 31 May 2012, at 22:31, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>> On 31 May 2012 06:42, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
>>> Hey list,
>>>
>>> The thread about "Why Are You Using FreeBSD", listing the pros and cons
>>> of FBSD, has brought back a topic to mind.
>>>
>>> Recentl
On 1/15/2011 5:11 AM, Jean-Yves Avenard wrote:
> If I compile openldap-client against openssl from ports, then it
> creates massive problems elsewhere.
[snip problems]
> I dislike this method, because should openldap gets upgraded again and
> be linked against openssl port, I will lock myself out o
On 9/16/2010 12:20 PM, Eivind E wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Sep 2010, Warren Block wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 15 Sep 2010, Eivind E wrote:
>>> (WW) RADEONHD(0): !!! Option HPD is set !!!
>>> This shall only be used to work around broken connector tables.
>>> Please report your findings to radeo...@opensu
On 3/7/2010 3:34 PM, Sam Leffler wrote:
> Not following the wlanX naming convention will cause confusion for
> things like rc config files (I believe). Definitely any tool I touched
> expects vap's to be named wlanX.
Duly noted. I wasn't aware of just how many issues would arise from
straying fro
On 2/28/2010 10:16 PM, Rui Paulo wrote:
> On 1 Mar 2010, at 03:05, Jim Pingle wrote:
>
>> On 2/28/2010 9:41 PM, Rui Paulo wrote:
>>> On 1 Mar 2010, at 02:26, Jim Pingle wrote:
>>>> Ah, I wasn't aware of wlandebug(8). However, it doesn't seem to operate
On 2/28/2010 9:41 PM, Rui Paulo wrote:
> On 1 Mar 2010, at 02:26, Jim Pingle wrote:
>> Ah, I wasn't aware of wlandebug(8). However, it doesn't seem to operate
>> on this mwl(4) card. It sets the value of the sysctl net.wlan.0.debug
>> and that doesn't show up
On 2/28/2010 7:03 PM, Rui Paulo wrote:
> On 28 Feb 2010, at 17:38, Jim Pingle wrote:
>> Are there some other bits that need set in order to have clients
>> associate with HT rates? Or some other prerequisite conditions such as
>> number of attached antennae? I do only have on
On 2/28/2010 2:29 PM, Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 12:38:19PM -0500, Jim Pingle wrote:
[snip]
>> In this case, the mwl card is the AP. The client line is from an
>> associated Windows 7 laptop with an Intel 5100abgn card which does show
>> the AP as 802.11
On 2/28/2010 7:54 AM, Rui Paulo wrote:
> On 28 Feb 2010, at 03:22, Jim Pingle wrote:
>>
>> Are you aware if similar work ongoing for the mwl(4) based 802.11n
>> cards? I picked up a couple cheap this past week and have them working
>> with hostapd but, as with the OP
On 2/27/2010 9:09 PM, Rui Paulo wrote:
> On 27 Feb 2010, at 20:29, Robert Watson wrote:
> Progress on supporting 11n with atheros cards is on going. There's much more
> to it than adapting the rate control algorithm. Please stay tuned.
Are you aware if similar work ongoing for the mwl(4) based 80
On 12/10/2009 2:28 AM, Daniel Braniss wrote:
>> On 12/9/2009 11:13 AM, Daniel Braniss wrote:
>>> hi,
>>> FreeBSD-8 works great on these boards, but there are some
>>> gotchas, the boot and the serial: output works fine, but input
>>> is 'problematic'. the pxeboot serial handling is ok, the boot
On 12/10/2009 2:32 AM, Daniel Braniss wrote:
>> Which ALIX board exactly? There are some differences (even various BIOSes).
>> Any chance you have vga driver in kernel? TinyBIOS emulates VGA a bit,
>> redirects output to serial port. If at the beginning you are trying both VGA
>> and serial port,
On 12/9/2009 11:13 AM, Daniel Braniss wrote:
> hi,
> FreeBSD-8 works great on these boards, but there are some
> gotchas, the boot and the serial: output works fine, but input
> is 'problematic'. the pxeboot serial handling is ok, the boot menu
> is ok, but booting off the CF (using boot0sio)
Marten Vijn wrote:
> Support for the following devices seems not to be continued in 8.0 (and
> 7.2 and higher):
>
> - WRAP 1C
> - WRAP 2E (EOL)
> - ALIX 1C
>
> Both devices stopped booting as described in several postings and pr's.
>
> My question/suggestion to announce this in the
>> 7.2 and 8.
subbsd wrote:
> Hello, i've got some problem with my SATA Optiarc DVD RW:
> message output on the screen in not stopped, but repeating with incremental
> delay:
> ...
> acd0: DVDR at ata3-master UDMA33
> HEOM_LABEL: Label for provider acd0 is iso9660/FreeBSD_Install
Did you retype this? Or did
Andrew Thompson wrote:
> Also an entry in UPDATING that a config error that was once harmless now
> renders the system unbootable (without intervention).
Would this also be something that mergemaster could check for and warn
against?
Jim
___
freebsd-sta
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> Summary: confirmed. Above two tests show that even if changing the IP
> to something else within the same network block, the default route is
> removed and not put back.
>
> This is pretty major, if you ask me.
I've encountered similar issues before, and typically just a
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> P.S. -- You're the 2nd person I've encountered in under a week who's
> using 440BX/GX-based hardware in present day. I would not be
> surprised if the board is simply going bad/failing due to age. :-)
I still have quite a few of these in active use. They are good
workhor
Dan Allen wrote:
> On 4 Sep 2008, at 8:22 AM, Jim Pingle wrote:
> Okay, so how about for packages on the base CD:
>
> * cvsup-without-gui (I also always use this)
> * rsync
> * perl
As others have mentioned, there are plenty of uses for packages, even if I
do not use them &quo
Wesley Shields wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 03, 2008 at 06:28:44PM -0600, Dan Allen wrote:
>> Hey, these great comments bring up a different solution, which may be
>> the way to go.
>>
>> It is simple: have a few of the common apps that are net-centric (like
>> firefox) be simply calls to pkg_add -r in the
Daniel O'Connor wrote:
On Thu, 12 Jun 2008, Jim Pingle wrote:
I need to see if I can improve the script any (suggestions are most
welcome) then open a PR to see if it -- or logic like it -- can be
included in the php-extensions meta port.
Adding the script to the port seems like the way
Daniel O'Connor wrote:
On Thu, 12 Jun 2008, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
I myself haven't ever run into extension ordering issues like those
described (and we've done hosting for years), but I don't doubt those
who have experienced such.
I am currently experiencing this :(
In the past I shuffled the
Claus Guttesen wrote:
I have installed php5 with support for postgresql (php5-pgsql). If I
install postgresql-client ver. 8.2.7 or 8.3.x apache (httpd)
core-dumps. If I install postgresql-client 8.1.11 or 8.2.6 apache does
not core-dump.
I have confirmed that it's postgresql which makes apa
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Teemu Korhonen wrote:
Did anyone find a solution to the "jerky mouse" -problem? It still
exists in 7.0-RELEASE.
I have pretty much exact same symptoms as in this post:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2008-January/039599.html
Part of the problem here i
Jim Pingle wrote:
Jim Pingle wrote:
I'm having some trouble with a SuperMicro SuperServer 6022L-6 that
previously ran 7.0-BETA4 without problems. Today, I updated this
machine to 7.0-PRERELEASE and now it will not fully boot unless I
disable ACPI. A quick search of the PR database didn&#
Jim Pingle wrote:
I'm having some trouble with a SuperMicro SuperServer 6022L-6 that
previously ran 7.0-BETA4 without problems. Today, I updated this machine
to 7.0-PRERELEASE and now it will not fully boot unless I disable ACPI.
A quick search of the PR database didn't turn u
I'm having some trouble with a SuperMicro SuperServer 6022L-6 that
previously ran 7.0-BETA4 without problems. Today, I updated this machine to
7.0-PRERELEASE and now it will not fully boot unless I disable ACPI. A quick
search of the PR database didn't turn up anything similar with sysctl and
Gavin Spomer wrote:
Kevin Oberman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 02/12/08 7:01 PM >>>
make buildkernel KERNCONF=YOUR_KERNEL_HERE
make installkernel KERNCONF=YOUR_KERNEL_HERE
If you put KERNCONF into make.conf, you can simplify it to:
make kernel
Just to be clear, if I add the appropriate KERNCONF line i
Chris H. wrote:
[snip]
While it
didn't fix my seeming php5 module number limitation. I was able, after
trial and error, to discover that the recode module was the module
causing Apache to dump core. Simply removing it from the list cured
it. :) Further investigation reveals that there are some is
Pete French wrote:
>> Have you checked that your dir hash isn't suffering due to lack of memory
>> this can have a marked impact on seemingly trivial things like this as
>> could silly things like the RAID card being installed in a different slot.
>
> RAID card is onboard on these things - how wou
Artem Kuchin wrote:
> A day ago at 11 am i have turn off the server,
> pull out the old driver, installed a new one, turned of the server
> and started rebuild in an hour from remote location via web interface.
> After about 5 minuted the machine became unresponsive. Tried rebooting
> - nothing. I
Charles Sprickman wrote:
> Any ideas on this one? This machine (one of those ancient VALinux 2U
> boxes, Intel L440GX+ board, dual PIII) hangs for a very long time
> between the second processor launching and geom_mirror kicking in. It
> does always boot, but the hang is more than a minute - just
Stephen Clark wrote:
> There is a deadly embrace.
>
> The /usr/src/UPDATING says I am going to miss out if I
> don't have the meta port installed (which I currently don't), but when I
> try to install
> the meta port it tells me I should use portupgrade to upgrade Xorg, but
> the /usr/src/UPDATING
Roland Smith wrote:
> Most spammers do not bother to return if they get a resend request.
> That's the whole point of doing this. So practically it doesn't increase
> bandwidth consumption.
This conversation is getting rather OT for -stable, but I felt the need to
ask a question:
To defeat this,
Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
> So the 1000$ question: is there any chance of getting at least the state
> of the RAID and its disk out into the open? It shure would give me a
> much better feeling, knowing that at least serious trouble would be
> detected by me. Instead of getting this call from a NO
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
> Installed it from ports, and it installed the compat4x stuff, but although it
> runs with no args, as soon as I try to access the controller:
>
>
> # raidutil -d 1 -L physical
> osdIOrequest : File /dev/rdptr17 Could Not Be Opened
> Engine connect failed: COMPATILITY
Dominik Zalewski wrote:
> I'm using FreeBSD 6.1 release on i386. I have a problem with pear and apache.
> Here is what I'm getting:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# pear list
> Installed packages, channel pear.php.net:
> =
> PackageVersion State
> Archive_
Antony Mawer wrote:
> On 3/06/2006 2:43 AM, Jack Vogel wrote:
>> On 6/2/06, Gavin Atkinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2006-06-01 at 15:30 -0700, Jack Vogel wrote:
>>> > Both on my own machine, and on systems in our test group's lab, we
>>> > notice these long (like 2min maybe?) delays n
Viktorija wrote:
> I have following problem. I have Palm Tungsten C and FreeBSD 6.1 on my
> laptop. I'm trying to synhronize my palm with freebsd, but without any
> success. What i did:
> in kernel added devices:
> ucom and uvisor.
> in usbd.conf:
> device "Palm Handheld"
> devname "uc
Raphael H. Becker wrote:
> Hi *,
>
> swap_pager: indefinite wait buffer: device amrd1s1d, blkno 77
>
> Any access to the RAID is impossible (e.g. login on console, shutdown,
> ... ), have to powercycle it.
>
> What is the meaning of this message?
I have encountered this error once before, and
Lukas Ertl wrote:
> On 11/9/05, Ingeborg Hellemo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>Fresh new ProLiant dl380 2 CPU/dual core
>>Fresh new FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE
>>
>>
>>During boot I arrive at
>>
>>da0 at ciss0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0
>>da0: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-0 device
>>da0: 135.168MB/s transfers
>>d
46 matches
Mail list logo
