o
have multiple extents (each extent must still be < 4 GiB). You may
need to explicitly specify ISO Level 3 to get the correct behavior
(i.e. use the '-iso-level 3' option with growisofs or mkisofs).
-- Bob Johnson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
On 3/6/08, Torfinn Ingolfsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In other words; if I have machines with ipv6 adresses that I can reach
> globally, but don't have a dns name for them, the usefulness is very
> limited.
>
> Is that challenge solved somehow with ipv6?
> It doesn't look like dyndns.org suppor
On 9/26/07, Dan Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In the last episode (Sep 26), Oliver Fromme said:
> > Bob Johnson wrote:
> > > Maybe. But I expect that the behavior for "rm -rf .." is there so
> > > that things don't get REALLY astonishing
On 9/25/07, Oliver Fromme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote:
> > Oliver Fromme wrote:
> >
> > > $ cd /tmp
> > > $ mkdir -p foo/var
> > > $ cd foo/bar
> > > $ rm -rf ../
> > > rm: ../: Invalid argument
> > > $ rm -rf ../
> > > $
> > >
[...]
> > Quick testing here:
> >
On 8/17/07, Svein Halvor Halvorsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Oliver Fromme wrote:
> > Roman Bogorodskiy wrote:
> > > Artem Kuchin wrote:
> > > > [FreeBSD crashes when a mounted device disappears]
> > >
> > > It's not a bug, it's a feature.
> >
> > I certainly wouldn't call it a feature. As
On 10/5/06, Karl Denninger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> > I know serial I/O is passe for many, but some of us have applications
that
> > actually require it, and can't rationally be moved to anything else due
> > to external hardware considerations.
>
[...]
Serial over IP will not work fo
Kai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
> Hello,
>
> Another ™.02,
>
> Today I'm installing Freebsd 6 from a CD, and I'm having to jump through
> loops to get it up-to-date. Take for example FreeBSD-SA-06:03.cpio.
>
> First I need to install the sources for the complete OS, then run a patch on
> it, and all
On 10/6/05, Bartosz Fabianowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > monitor are wider than taller, why restrain horizontal space ?
>
> A fixed width design is very fashionable these days and you see it creeping
> up everywhere. It's what's considered "professional" these days, so I can't
> really blame
On 9/13/05, Sandro Noel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> thank you all for the ULTRA fast reply,
> i had an entry in the resolv.conf that did not belong there.
> problem solved.
>
>
> something is bothering me...
> the entry stated that it was the ip of my gateway 10.0.5.1
> wich is the same addres
On 6/23/05, Matthias Buelow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Joao Carlos Mendes Luis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >kernel sends some messages, "ata0-master: failure - ATA_IDENTIFY timed
> >out", "ata0-master: failure - ATA_IDENTIFY timed out", and them no hard
> >disk is identified, so I cannot ins
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 20:06:08 -0600
From: Stephen Montgomery-Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Panic - cannot get a dump
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(This is a follow up to earlier messages I sent to freebsd-smp because
then I thought it was an smp issue - no
On Friday 25 February 2005 08:55 am, Robert Watson wrote:
> I've just merged a fairly large set of changes to the netipx tree from
> HEAD to RELENG_5. These primarily consist of structural changes required
> for the locking of the netipx protocol, but excludes the locking changes
> themselves. Th
Jonathan Chen wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 03:12:25PM -0800, Mike Hoskins wrote:
> > On Mon, 18 Nov 2002, Sameer R. Manek wrote:
>
> [..]
> > > The definition of what is -stable has been relaxed in the past 2 years. If
> > > you look at the handbook from 2 years ago, you will see this is wh
Thanks!
>
> BDW
>
> > > 2.) is this a mistake? If so, when will it be corrected?
> > >
> >
> >http://www.FreeBSD.org/FAQ/book.html#RELEASE-CANDIDATE
> >
> >--
> >Chris D. Faulhaber - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >-------
>
> Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2001 23:34:19 +0900
> From: "Daniel C. Sobral" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: KERNCONF instead of KERNEL?
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > What is the prefered way to update a remote machine now? For years, I've run
> a
> > make buildworld, installworld, cd /sys/i
15 matches
Mail list logo
