FreeBSD 11 RC1 flowtable crash

I just upgraded a machine from 10-STABLE to FreeBSD 11, and the machine seems to crash frequently if flowtable is enabled. Other machines I have using the identical kernel does not seem to be affected, and the same hardward on the old 10-STABLE branch was quick stable. Interfaces on this mach

Re: svn commit: r301752 - head/contrib/netbsd-tests/lib/libc/string

> On Aug 31, 2016, at 7:11 PM, Craig Rodrigues wrote: > > Ngie, > > Can you please MFC this to stable/10 branch? > I believe this has been causing a test failure in this branch > since June. Shoot — I’ll verify the issue and commit the change. Thanks, -Ngie ___

Re: svn commit: r301752 - head/contrib/netbsd-tests/lib/libc/string

Ngie, Can you please MFC this to stable/10 branch? I believe this has been causing a test failure in this branch since June. Thanks. -- Craig On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 11:35 AM, Garrett Cooper wrote: > Author: ngie > Date: Thu Jun 9 18:35:37 2016 > New Revision: 301752 > URL: https://svnweb.fr

Jenkins build is still unstable: FreeBSD_stable_10 #367

See ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: Ephemeral /var/run and creating port-specific subdir at service startup time

On 01/09/16 00:12, Mark Martinec wrote: I prefer to have a /var/run file system reside on a tmpfs as its contents is small and ephemeral in its nature (like pid files, lock files, sockets), need not be preserved across reboots, and should not have to depend on any physical disk. The problem is t

Re: Benchmarks results for Compilers on FreeBSD 11

On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 3:55 PM, Erich Dollansky wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, 31 Aug 2016 12:16:16 -0700 > "K. Macy" wrote: > >> On Wednesday, August 31, 2016, Mark Linimon >> wrote: >> >> > But for me an attraction has always been "you can build it out of >> > the box", even if I rarely do it (e.g.

Ephemeral /var/run and creating port-specific subdir at service startup time

I prefer to have a /var/run file system reside on a tmpfs as its contents is small and ephemeral in its nature (like pid files, lock files, sockets), need not be preserved across reboots, and should not have to depend on any physical disk. The problem is that some programs/services/ports like to

Re: Benchmarks results for Compilers on FreeBSD 11

Hi, On Wed, 31 Aug 2016 12:16:16 -0700 "K. Macy" wrote: > On Wednesday, August 31, 2016, Mark Linimon > wrote: > > > But for me an attraction has always been "you can build it out of > > the box", even if I rarely do it (e.g. I am not working in the > > kernel/driver area), > > > > Can clan

Jenkins build is still unstable: FreeBSD_stable_10 #366

See ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Jenkins build is still unstable: FreeBSD_stable_10 #365

See ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: Benchmarks results for Compilers on FreeBSD 11

On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 12:16:16PM -0700, K. Macy wrote: > On Wednesday, August 31, 2016, Mark Linimon wrote: > > > I'll demur just a bit on your points. > > > > On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 08:51:02PM -0700, K. Macy wrote: > > > "we need a compiler to build the system" (a prebuilt package does that >

Re: Benchmarks results for Compilers on FreeBSD 11

On Wednesday, August 31, 2016, Mark Linimon wrote: > I'll demur just a bit on your points. > > On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 08:51:02PM -0700, K. Macy wrote: > > "we need a compiler to build the system" (a prebuilt package does that > > just fine), > > Well, yes, for a tier-1 machine; and one that is c

Re: Benchmarks results for Compilers on FreeBSD 11

I'll demur just a bit on your points. On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 08:51:02PM -0700, K. Macy wrote: > "we need a compiler to build the system" (a prebuilt package does that > just fine), Well, yes, for a tier-1 machine; and one that is connected to the network. > I can't speak for the whole universe

Re: Benchmarks results for FreeBSD 11

Plans for usage of LLVM's linker were just discussed on BSDNow (from toolchain mailing list): http://www.bsdnow.tv/episodes/2016_08_24-the_fresh_bsd_experience https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-toolchain/2016-August/002240.html - Eric On Wednesday, August 31, 2016, Fernando Herrero

Re: Benchmarks results for FreeBSD 11

That's great news! Thanks a lot! Excuse me if I drift off-topic, how about -flto? LTO requires both compiler and linker support, however clang3? from ports still calls the system linker 'ld'. LLVM has its own linker, 'lld', but it is not straightforward, AFAIK, to make clang3? call it. My trick u