On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 11:49:31PM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> Other question: is there any correlation between the amount of time that
> goes by between events with, say, ARP/MAC address expiry in "arp -a"? I
> mention this because I know some of the ASF methods have historically
> shown two
> On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 09:28:00AM +0300, Daniel Braniss wrote:
> > > On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 10:59:28AM +0300, Daniel Braniss wrote:
> > > > > On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 05:31:13PM +0300, Daniel Braniss wrote:
> > > > > > hi, after upgrading to 9.1-stable, this particular hardware -
> > > > > > Su
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 09:28:00AM +0300, Daniel Braniss wrote:
> > On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 10:59:28AM +0300, Daniel Braniss wrote:
> > > > On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 05:31:13PM +0300, Daniel Braniss wrote:
> > > > > hi, after upgrading to 9.1-stable, this particular hardware - SunFire
> > > > > X220
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 09:28:00AM +0300, Daniel Braniss wrote:
> > On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 10:59:28AM +0300, Daniel Braniss wrote:
> > > > On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 05:31:13PM +0300, Daniel Braniss wrote:
> > > > > hi, after upgrading to 9.1-stable, this particular hardware - SunFire
> > > > > X220
...
> There are ways you can speed up the replication time. I tend to flood a ser=
> ver with
> TCP while I've heard of it happening under UDP flood too.
>
> Here's a nice way to flood a server with TCP (assuming you have SSH access =
> to the
> system via keys):
>
> sh -c 'while :;do dd if=3D/de
> On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 10:59:28AM +0300, Daniel Braniss wrote:
> > > On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 05:31:13PM +0300, Daniel Braniss wrote:
> > > > hi, after upgrading to 9.1-stable, this particular hardware - SunFire
> > > > X2200,
> > >
> > > Show me dmesg(bge(4) and brgphy(4) only) and 'ifconfig b
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 10:59:28AM +0300, Daniel Braniss wrote:
> > On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 05:31:13PM +0300, Daniel Braniss wrote:
> > > hi, after upgrading to 9.1-stable, this particular hardware - SunFire
> > > X2200,
> >
> > Show me dmesg(bge(4) and brgphy(4) only) and 'ifconfig bge1' output.
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 01:02:14PM -0400, Michael L. Squires wrote:
>
> On Mon, 27 May 2013, YongHyeon PYUN wrote:
>
> >On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 08:38:41PM +0900, YongHyeon PYUN wrote:
> >>On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 04:36:46PM +0900, Hiroki Sato wrote:
> >>>Hiroki Sato wrote
> >>> in <20130524.1629
On Mon, 27 May 2013, YongHyeon PYUN wrote:
On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 08:38:41PM +0900, YongHyeon PYUN wrote:
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 04:36:46PM +0900, Hiroki Sato wrote:
Hiroki Sato wrote
in <20130524.162926.395058052118975996@allbsd.org>:
hr> YongHyeon PYUN wrote
hr> in <20130524054
On Fri, 24 May 2013, Mikolaj Golub wrote:
> > > > http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/248291
> > > ...
> > > > The reason I'm asking is that it could lead to changes in hast-related
> > > > scripts
> > > > which one use in production.
> > >
> > >
> > > Any chance we could do this is 2 sta
On May 27, 2013, at 12:59 AM, Daniel Braniss wrote:
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 05:31:13PM +0300, Daniel Braniss wrote:
hi, after upgrading to 9.1-stable, this particular hardware - SunFire X2200,
If you're truly running stable/9, and it's up-to-date, you should have have
already
SVN revisions 248
> On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 05:31:13PM +0300, Daniel Braniss wrote:
> > hi, after upgrading to 9.1-stable, this particular hardware - SunFire X2200,
>
> Show me dmesg(bge(4) and brgphy(4) only) and 'ifconfig bge1' output.
>
bge0: mem
0xfdff-0xfdff,0xfdfe-0xfdfe irq 17 at device 4
12 matches
Mail list logo
