Trying the patch now … but what do you mean by using 'SIGSTOP'? I generally do
a 'kill -HUP' then when that doesn't work 'kill -9' … should Iuse -STOP instead
of 9?
On 2013-02-15, at 5:44 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
>
> I think this is the right idea, but in HEAD with the sigdeferstop() change
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 01:20:20PM -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 02:32:10PM -0500, Gary Palmer wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 02:57:10AM -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> > > On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 11:26:11AM +0100, Alfred Bartsch wrote:
> > > > we want to use this scri
On 02/15/13 09:27, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote:
Hello,
like already posted, on 9.1-R, I highly appreciate the new jail(8) and
jail.conf capabilities. Thanks for that extension!
Accidentally I saw that "devfs_ruleset" seems to be ignored.
If I list /dev/ I see all the hosts disk devices etc.
I s
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 01:32:57PM -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> I'll file a PR for this.
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=176181
--
| Jeremy Chadwick j...@koitsu.org |
| UNIX Systems Administratorhttp://jdc.koitsu.org/ |
| Mountain V
FreeBSD 9.1-STABLE #2 r244942M: Tue Feb 5 21:54:29 CST 2013
k...@dbms.denninger.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/KSD-SMP
(custom kernel is there to support PPS for my GPS clock)
Attempting to add a generic card that claims to have a Envy24DT chipset
in it; it identifies and loads under the snd_envy2
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 01:20:20PM -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 02:32:10PM -0500, Gary Palmer wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 02:57:10AM -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> > > On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 11:26:11AM +0100, Alfred Bartsch wrote:
> > > > we want to use this scri
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 02:32:10PM -0500, Gary Palmer wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 02:57:10AM -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 11:26:11AM +0100, Alfred Bartsch wrote:
> > > we want to use this script for server administration purposes. After
> > > doing some testing, fo
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 02:57:10AM -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 11:26:11AM +0100, Alfred Bartsch wrote:
> > we want to use this script for server administration purposes. After
> > doing some testing, for now there are following issues left:
> >
> > 1) every execution of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Jeremy,
thanks for your quick response. If I understand you right, you don't
see any necessity for updating /usr/sbin/service. I'll try to make my
point of view more comprehensible.
Am 15.02.2013 11:57, schrieb Jeremy Chadwick:
> On Fri, Feb 15, 2
schrieb Mateusz Guzik am 15.02.2013 17:50 (localtime):
> On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 05:43:16PM +0100, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> while playing with new jail features, I recognized that manually
>> umounting doesn't work as I'd expect.
>> After jail has been destroyed, the following m
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 05:43:16PM +0100, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote:
> Hello,
>
> while playing with new jail features, I recognized that manually
> umounting doesn't work as I'd expect.
> After jail has been destroyed, the following mountpoint is active:
> /dev/gpt/jailname1ROOT on /.jail.ja
Hello,
while playing with new jail features, I recognized that manually
umounting doesn't work as I'd expect.
After jail has been destroyed, the following mountpoint is active:
/dev/gpt/jailname1ROOT on /.jail.jailname1 (ufs, local, read-only)
There was var mounted to /.jail.jailname1/var bu
Hello,
like already posted, on 9.1-R, I highly appreciate the new jail(8) and
jail.conf capabilities. Thanks for that extension!
Accidentally I saw that "devfs_ruleset" seems to be ignored.
If I list /dev/ I see all the hosts disk devices etc.
I set "devfs_ruleset = 4;" and "enforce_statfs = 1;"
On Friday, February 15, 2013 10:21:11 am Rick Macklem wrote:
> Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 08:44:43AM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
> > > On Thursday, February 14, 2013 10:05:56 pm Rick Macklem wrote:
> > > > Marc Fournier wrote:
> > > > > On 2013-02-13, at 3:54 PM, Rick Mac
On 2/15/2013 9:37 AM, Kurt Lidl wrote:
>
> Hmm.
>
> I've got IPSEC tunnels from Windows XP and Windows 7 working
> to a FreeBSD 8.3 host, using NAT/T.
>
> I'm using the Shrewsoft client: http://www.shrew.net/software
>
> -Kurt
> _
The goal is to do it using only the native Win/7 VP
Hmm.
I've got IPSEC tunnels from Windows XP and Windows 7 working
to a FreeBSD 8.3 host, using NAT/T.
I'm using the Shrewsoft client: http://www.shrew.net/software
-Kurt
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/lis
Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 08:44:43AM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
> > On Thursday, February 14, 2013 10:05:56 pm Rick Macklem wrote:
> > > Marc Fournier wrote:
> > > > On 2013-02-13, at 3:54 PM, Rick Macklem
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >>
> > > > > The pid that is in "T
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 08:44:43AM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Thursday, February 14, 2013 10:05:56 pm Rick Macklem wrote:
> > Marc Fournier wrote:
> > > On 2013-02-13, at 3:54 PM, Rick Macklem wrote:
> > >
> > > >>
> > > > The pid that is in "T" state for the "ps auxlH".
> > >
> > > Differe
Hello there,
Just a final reminder: the deadline for the reports is this Sunday.
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 3:42 PM, Gabor Pali wrote:
> Let me call your attention to the approaching deadline of the next
> set(s) of FreeBSD Quarterly Status Reports. Please consider
> submitting a few lines on your
On Thursday, February 07, 2013 2:25:17 pm John Baldwin wrote:
> On Thursday, February 07, 2013 1:28:30 pm Mikhail T. wrote:
> > On 07.02.2013 13:16, John Baldwin wrote:
> > > Can you get pciconf -lc output?
> > Here:
> >
> > hostb0@pci0:0:0:0: class=0x06 card=0x
> > chip=0
On Thursday, February 14, 2013 10:05:56 pm Rick Macklem wrote:
> Marc Fournier wrote:
> > On 2013-02-13, at 3:54 PM, Rick Macklem wrote:
> >
> > >>
> > > The pid that is in "T" state for the "ps auxlH".
> >
> > Different server, last kernel update on Jan 22nd, https process this
> > time instead
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 11:26:11AM +0100, Alfred Bartsch wrote:
> we want to use this script for server administration purposes. After
> doing some testing, for now there are following issues left:
>
> 1) every execution of "service -e" casts a bunch of unnecessary
> warnings into /var/log/messag
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
we want to use this script for server administration purposes. After
doing some testing, for now there are following issues left:
1) every execution of "service -e" casts a bunch of unnecessary
warnings into /var/log/messages:
"... /usr/sbin
23 matches
Mail list logo
