Am 03.01.2013 01:50, schrieb Erich Dollansky:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 02 Jan 2013 17:02:11 +0100
> Matthias Andree <...@FreeBSD.org> wrote:
Please do not quote addresses. Not all web archives and copies hide
them properly.
>> The migration was made in order to get "things inside the OS ...
>> improve
> On Wed, Jan 02, 2013 at 08:33:41AM +0200, Daniel Braniss wrote:
> > Hi,
> > the last batch of changes to bge caused the ipmi to stop working on a
> > Sun Fire X2200 M2, and
> > bge0:
> > mem
> > 0xfdff-0xfdff,0xfdfe-0xfdfe irq 17 at device 4.0 on pci6
> > bge0: CHIP ID 0x9
On Wed, Jan 02, 2013 at 08:33:41AM +0200, Daniel Braniss wrote:
> Hi,
> the last batch of changes to bge caused the ipmi to stop working on a
> Sun Fire X2200 M2, and
> bge0:
> mem
> 0xfdff-0xfdff,0xfdfe-0xfdfe irq 17 at device 4.0 on pci6
> bge0: CHIP ID 0x9003; ASIC REV 0x
Hi,
On Wed, 02 Jan 2013 17:02:11 +0100
Matthias Andree wrote:
> Am 02.01.2013 06:31, schrieb Erich Dollansky:
> > Hi,
> >
> >> Thank God! I'd hate to think that after unwinding years accumulated
> >> CVS process, to rewind it for SVN, only to have to do it again for
> >> GIT, just seems a bit m
Greetings Peter, and thank you _very_ much for the thoughtful, and
very informative reply -- _greatly_ appreciated.
> On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 2:39 PM, Chris H wrote:
>>> On 31 December 2012 15:40, Chris H wrote:
Are there _any_ CVS servers/trunks/tree's left? If so, how _current_ are
th
On Jan 2, 2013, at 2:10 PM, Matthew Seaman
wrote:
> On 02/01/2013 17:49, Paul Mather wrote:
>> Yesterday, I updated my RELENG_8 ZFS-only system that has worked like a
>> champ for ages. After a successful install{kernel,world} and reboot, I
>> noticed the 20121130 entry in /usr/src/UPDATING a
On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 2:39 PM, Chris H wrote:
>> On 31 December 2012 15:40, Chris H wrote:
>>> Are there _any_ CVS servers/trunks/tree's left? If so, how _current_ are
>>> they?
>>
>> Ports and Source currently have CVS trees.
>> Ports has an explicit EoL on February 28th (2 months from today)
On 02/01/2013 17:49, Paul Mather wrote:
> Yesterday, I updated my RELENG_8 ZFS-only system that has worked like a champ
> for ages. After a successful install{kernel,world} and reboot, I noticed the
> 20121130 entry in /usr/src/UPDATING and upgraded my ZFS pool via "zfs upgrade
> -a". I also u
On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 9:30 PM, Doug Hardie wrote:
> Is the cvs code going away?
If you mean, /usr/bin/cvs.. then you should be aware that there is an
identical version in ports/devel/cvs. Having a single version in
ports has the advantage that the same bug fixes are available to all
branches o
On 1/1/13, m...@freebsd.org wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 1:18 PM, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
>> "git-svn" is somewhat problematic:
>>
>> http://wiki.freebsd.org/GitWorkflow -> "Using git-svn (FreeBSD committers
>> only)" ->
>>
>>> Things to keep in mind:
>>>
>>> *
>>>
>>> Never git merge bra
Yesterday, I updated my RELENG_8 ZFS-only system that has worked like a champ
for ages. After a successful install{kernel,world} and reboot, I noticed the
20121130 entry in /usr/src/UPDATING and upgraded my ZFS pool via "zfs upgrade
-a". I also upgraded my boot blocks as requested, and as per
lowing URLs are a log of ps, trace, and
> > etc.:
> >
> > http://people.allbsd.org/~hrs/FreeBSD/pool.log.20130102
> > http://people.allbsd.org/~hrs/FreeBSD/pool.dmesg.20130102
> >
> > Does anyone see how to debug this? I guess this is due to a deadlock
> >
On Mon, 24 Dec 2012 04:50:22 +1100, Ian Smith wrote:
[following up my own message with a later report]
> On Sun, 23 Dec 2012 15:21:23 +0300, Sergey Kandaurov wrote:
> > On 23 December 2012 10:22, Ian Smith wrote:
> > > On Sun, 23 Dec 2012 03:45:39 +0300, Sergey Kandaurov wrote:
> > > > Th
Did you guys end up identifying the cause of that panic?
--
Glen Wiley
Systems Architect
Verisign Inc.
On 12/23/12 12:56 PM, "Sean Kelly" wrote:
>Greetings.
>
>All I have to do to panic it is boot it. As you can see from the dump, it
>died after about 30 seconds without me doing anything. I
On 1/2/13 8:05 AM, Derek Kulinski wrote:
Eitan Adler wrote:
On 2 January 2013 06:26, Chris Rees wrote:
To clarify, no-one wants to remove CVS completely, the suggestion was
to
move it out of the base system.
As the developer responsible for this:
CVS will be removed from base. It alread
On 2 January 2013 16:05, Derek Kulinski wrote:
> Eitan Adler wrote:
>
>>On 2 January 2013 06:26, Chris Rees wrote:
>>> To clarify, no-one wants to remove CVS completely, the suggestion was
>>to
>>> move it out of the base system.
>>
>>As the developer responsible for this:
>>
>>CVS will be remov
No, it remains an outstanding issue. We've begun moving services to a spare
server to give us more time to investigate it.
From: Wiley, Glen [gwi...@verisign.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2013 9:52 AM
To: Sean Kelly; Daniel Braniss
Cc: freebsd-stable@f
Eitan Adler wrote:
>On 2 January 2013 06:26, Chris Rees wrote:
>> To clarify, no-one wants to remove CVS completely, the suggestion was
>to
>> move it out of the base system.
>
>As the developer responsible for this:
>
>CVS will be removed from base. It already exists as a port in
>devel/cvs
W
Am 02.01.2013 06:31, schrieb Erich Dollansky:
> Hi,
>
>> Thank God! I'd hate to think that after unwinding years accumulated
>> CVS process, to rewind it for SVN, only to have to do it again for
>> GIT, just seems a bit masochistic.
>
> do not worry. It will come.
>
> Seriously, I do not underst
On 2 January 2013 06:26, Chris Rees wrote:
> To clarify, no-one wants to remove CVS completely, the suggestion was to
> move it out of the base system.
As the developer responsible for this:
CVS will be removed from base. It already exists as a port in devel/cvs
--
Eitan Adler
__
d.
>
> It did not panic, just stopped working---while it responded to ping,
> userland programs seemed not working. I could break it into DDB and
> get a kernel dump. The following URLs are a log of ps, trace, and
> etc.:
>
> http://people.allbsd.org/~hrs/FreeBSD/pool.log.2
On 2 Jan 2013 11:08, "Thomas Mueller" wrote:
>
> > There has been some discussion about removing CVS from the base system
> > now it is no longer used. No concensus was reached, so it's not going
> > away immediately (and would not be removed from 9.x or earlier branches
> > in any case).
>
> > C
> There has been some discussion about removing CVS from the base system
> now it is no longer used. No concensus was reached, so it's not going
> away immediately (and would not be removed from 9.x or earlier branches
> in any case).
> CVS is (and will remain) available in ports (devel/cvs).
>
23 matches
Mail list logo
