Eitan Adler <li...@eitanadler.com> wrote: >On 2 January 2013 06:26, Chris Rees <utis...@gmail.com> wrote: >> To clarify, no-one wants to remove CVS completely, the suggestion was >to >> move it out of the base system. > >As the developer responsible for this: > >CVS will be removed from base. It already exists as a port in >devel/cvs
Will svn be added to the base? Not long ago I run into an issue when trying to downgrade my system to 9.0. After I noticed how majority of ports were broken due to changes in the libc I decided to back out by fetching 9.1 release just to learn that svn does not work as well. There were a lot of dependencies I decided to use portupgrade which required me to recompile ruby. After that it was a lot of compiling (for example Apache because apr was broken). Having svn in the base would save tons of time in my situation. -- Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
