On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 03:46:14PM +0900, Randy Bush wrote:
> > Randy, when moving from one to another, are you deleting the contents of
> > /usr/src before doing the csup? More explicitly, this is what you
> > should do when going from one release to another:
> >
> > rm -fr /usr/src
> > rm -fr /
> Randy, when moving from one to another, are you deleting the contents of
> /usr/src before doing the csup? More explicitly, this is what you
> should do when going from one release to another:
>
> rm -fr /usr/src
> rm -fr /var/db/sup/src-all
> rm -fr /usr/obj/*
> csup ...
first one in is one o
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 02:14:44PM +0900, Randy Bush wrote:
> > Randy, when moving from one to another, are you deleting the contents
> > of /usr/src before doing the csup? More explicitly, this is what you
> > should do when going from one release to another:
> >
> > rm -fr /usr/src
> > rm -fr /
> Randy, when moving from one to another, are you deleting the contents
> of /usr/src before doing the csup? More explicitly, this is what you
> should do when going from one release to another:
>
> rm -fr /usr/src
> rm -fr /var/db/sup/src-all
> rm -fr /usr/obj/*
> csup ...
in a decade or more,
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 01:37:31PM +0900, Randy Bush wrote:
> fresh csup, multiple am64 machines trying to go from 8.2 to 9.0
>
> it is also on an one i386 running 9.0
>
> FreeBSD psg.com 9.0-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 9.0-PRERELEASE #2: Sat Dec 24 13:35:25
> GMT 2011 r...@psg.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/s
fresh csup, multiple am64 machines trying to go from 8.2 to 9.0
it is also on an one i386 running 9.0
FreeBSD psg.com 9.0-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 9.0-PRERELEASE #2: Sat Dec 24 13:35:25
GMT 2011 r...@psg.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/PSG i386
sh /usr/src/tools/install.sh -s -o root -g wheel -m 555
On Sun, 22 Jan 2012, mato wrote:
> On Sat, 21 Jan 2012 22:57:05 +0200, Alexander Motin wrote
> > Hi.
> >
> > On 01/21/12 21:34, mato wrote:
> > > I've used freebsd-update to upgrade from 8.2-R to 9.0-R and all looked
> > > nice
> > > until the first reboot. Now my FreeBSD always hangs mid
On Sat, 21 Jan 2012 22:57:05 +0200, Alexander Motin wrote
> Hi.
>
> On 01/21/12 21:34, mato wrote:
> > I've used freebsd-update to upgrade from 8.2-R to 9.0-R and all looked nice
> > until the first reboot. Now my FreeBSD always hangs midway through the boot
> > process and the last message outpu
Hi.
On 01/21/12 21:34, mato wrote:
I've used freebsd-update to upgrade from 8.2-R to 9.0-R and all looked nice
until the first reboot. Now my FreeBSD always hangs midway through the boot
process and the last message output is:
"uhub3:
The last line is the ATAPI device detection. What ATA contr
On 2012-Jan-15 17:02:33 +0100, "C. P. Ghost" wrote:
>I'm trying to boot 9.0-RELEASE on sparc64, but I'm
>getting stuck at:
>
>panic: kmem_suballoc: bad status return of 3
>cpuid = 0
>KDB: stack backtrace:
> #0 0xc079841c at ??+0
> #1 0xc04ca59c at ??+0
> #2 0xc0487f90 at ??+0
> #3 0xc0098028 at ??
Hi,
I've used freebsd-update to upgrade from 8.2-R to 9.0-R and all looked nice
until the first reboot. Now my FreeBSD always hangs midway through the boot
process and the last message output is:
"uhub3: http://www.pipni.cz/
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.o
On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 7:46 AM, Jeremy Chadwick
wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 02:11:51PM +0100, Martin Sugioarto wrote:
> > Am Sat, 21 Jan 2012 13:20:51 +0100
> > schrieb "Ronald Klop" :
> > > BTW: My experience with VBox is that it is nice for hobby stuff, but
> > > not for heavy load server
Ronald Klop wrote:
On Sat, 21 Jan 2012 14:11:51 +0100, Martin Sugioarto
wrote:
Am Sat, 21 Jan 2012 13:20:51 +0100
schrieb "Ronald Klop" :
Hi,
As I understand it.
Host: FreeBSD 9
Guest: WinXP
Which one has troubles with its clock? The host or the guest or both?
Hi,
only inside VirtualBo
That's the thing... neither do I. I never did. But it happened nonetheless.
I'm hoping that somebody with some time to kill might try out the config and
see if it can be duplicated.
Cheers,
DMK
On January 21, 2012 08:13:09 AM Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 20/01/2012 23:56 Dwayne MacKinnon said the f
On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 02:11:51PM +0100, Martin Sugioarto wrote:
> Am Sat, 21 Jan 2012 13:20:51 +0100
> schrieb "Ronald Klop" :
> > Do you run NTP on the guest XP also? If yes, turn it off.
>
> Windows XP default installation (synch'ed to time.windows.com).
> Switching this off, does not have any
On Sat, 21 Jan 2012 14:11:51 +0100, Martin Sugioarto
wrote:
Am Sat, 21 Jan 2012 13:20:51 +0100
schrieb "Ronald Klop" :
Hi,
As I understand it.
Host: FreeBSD 9
Guest: WinXP
Which one has troubles with its clock? The host or the guest or both?
Hi,
only inside VirtualBox, I think it's onl
On 01/21/12 15:20, Martin Sugioarto wrote:
Am Sat, 21 Jan 2012 14:30:53 +0200
schrieb Alexander Motin:
I am not using VirtualBox right now, so I'll need to setup it to test
this. Meanwhile you could try to experiment with switching to
different timecounters and eventtimers. May be some change in
Am Sat, 21 Jan 2012 14:30:53 +0200
schrieb Alexander Motin :
Hi Alexander,
> I am not using VirtualBox right now, so I'll need to setup it to test
> this. Meanwhile you could try to experiment with switching to
> different timecounters and eventtimers. May be some change in 9.0
> changed default
on 20/01/2012 23:56 Dwayne MacKinnon said the following:
> As there is interest, I've redone my kernel config in the style espoused by
> Andriy & Mark.
This looks much more manageable. Unfortunately, I do not see anything that could
have cause the problem that you've reported.
> On January 20,
Am Sat, 21 Jan 2012 13:20:51 +0100
schrieb "Ronald Klop" :
> Hi,
>
> As I understand it.
> Host: FreeBSD 9
> Guest: WinXP
>
> Which one has troubles with its clock? The host or the guest or both?
Hi,
only inside VirtualBox, I think it's only an application problem and
my emails would be probab
On Sat, 21 Jan 2012 10:18:42 +0100, Martin Sugioarto
wrote:
Am Wed, 18 Jan 2012 07:50:49 +0100
schrieb Martin Sugioarto :
I can confirm this on VirtualBox. I've been running WinXP inside
VirtualBox and measured network I/O during downloads. It showed me
very high download rates (around 800k
> fresh csup, multiple amd64 machines
>
> sh /usr/src/tools/install.sh -s -o root -g wheel -m 555 clang-tblgen
> /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/legacy/usr/bin
> ===> gnu/usr.bin/gperf (obj,depend,all,install)
> /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/gperf created for
> /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/gperf
> ===
Hi.
On 01/21/12 11:18, Martin Sugioarto wrote:
Am Wed, 18 Jan 2012 07:50:49 +0100
schrieb Martin Sugioarto:
I can confirm this on VirtualBox. I've been running WinXP inside
VirtualBox and measured network I/O during downloads. It showed me
very high download rates (around 800kB/s) while it's p
> fresh csup, multiple amd64 machines
>
> sh /usr/src/tools/install.sh -s -o root -g wheel -m 555 clang-tblgen
> /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/legacy/usr/bin
> ===> gnu/usr.bin/gperf (obj,depend,all,install)
> /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/gperf created for
> /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/gperf
> ===
fresh csup, multiple amd64 machines
sh /usr/src/tools/install.sh -s -o root -g wheel -m 555 clang-tblgen
/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/legacy/usr/bin
===> gnu/usr.bin/gperf (obj,depend,all,install)
/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/gperf created for
/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/gperf
===> gnu/usr.bin/gp
Am Wed, 18 Jan 2012 07:50:49 +0100
schrieb Martin Sugioarto :
> I can confirm this on VirtualBox. I've been running WinXP inside
> VirtualBox and measured network I/O during downloads. It showed me
> very high download rates (around 800kB/s) while it's physically
> possible to download 200kB/s thr
26 matches
Mail list logo