On Sun, 18 Sep 2011 07:39:01 +0200, Jeremy Chadwick
wrote:
On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 12:54:13AM -0400, Jason Hellenthal wrote:
On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 01:49:15AM +0200, Ronald Klop wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm running portupgrade in screen to update all the ports for
> 9-BETA2/9-CURRENT on amd64. Whil
On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 12:54:13AM -0400, Jason Hellenthal wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 01:49:15AM +0200, Ronald Klop wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm running portupgrade in screen to update all the ports for
> > 9-BETA2/9-CURRENT on amd64. While doing this script eats 100% cpu.
> > Because portup
What would help here, is for a carp interface to wait a given delay
(tunable through a sysctl ?) after creation or after being brought up
I see now.
The tunable sounds like a good idea; we should check OpenBSD, they
probably already implemented something and we're behind.
If not, a "preemp
Hi,
I'm running portupgrade in screen to update all the ports for
9-BETA2/9-CURRENT on amd64. While doing this script eats 100% cpu.
Because portupgrade -fa crashed I'm running this command to update the
remaining non-updates ports.
find /var/db/pkg -name +DESC -mtime +2 |cut -d / -f 5 | xarg
18.09.2011 03:22, YongHyeon PYUN пишет:
>>> Glad to hear that. Unfortunately I have no plan or time to merge
>>> all changes made in re(4)/rl(4) to stable/6 so you may have to
>>> stick to this unofficial driver. As you already know, I overhauled
>>> these drivers long time ago and there were too
On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 03:11:46AM +0700, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> 18.09.2011 03:05, YongHyeon PYUN пишет:
>
> >>> I have back-ported re(4)/rl(4) for latest 6.x.
> >>> http://people.freebsd.org/~yongari/re/6.x/README.txt
> >>> Just compile tested and not sure whether it fixes the issue.
> >>
> >>
18.09.2011 03:05, YongHyeon PYUN пишет:
>>> I have back-ported re(4)/rl(4) for latest 6.x.
>>> http://people.freebsd.org/~yongari/re/6.x/README.txt
>>> Just compile tested and not sure whether it fixes the issue.
>>
>> I confirm that the problem disappears using this driver with clean RELENG_6
>>
On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 09:03:50PM +0700, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> 17.09.2011 02:13, YongHyeon PYUN пишет:
> > On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 11:45:25AM +0700, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> >> 16.09.2011 02:19, YongHyeon PYUN пишет:
> >>> On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 02:02:37AM +0700, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
>
On Sep 15, 2011, at 23:14 , Damien Fleuriot wrote:
> What would help here, is for a carp interface to wait a given delay
> (tunable through a sysctl ?) after creation or after being brought up
> from down.
I have the same observation. Perhaps it can just avoid going up initially ---
it will bec
17.09.2011 02:13, YongHyeon PYUN пишет:
> On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 11:45:25AM +0700, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
>> 16.09.2011 02:19, YongHyeon PYUN пишет:
>>> On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 02:02:37AM +0700, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
16.09.2011 01:15, YongHyeon PYUN пишет:
> I remember re(4) in 6.x
10 matches
Mail list logo