On 11 June 2011 03:48, Jim Bryant wrote:
> this is with if_urtw.c patched to change L to B as you supplied.
>
> I'm here for testing.. any more ideas? If anyone wants to play themselves,
> look on ebay for WiFiSky 1500mW B/G with 6dBi antenna. It seems that half
> of Hong Kong is selling these
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 06:24:51PM -0700, Xin LI wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 5:59 PM, Jeremy Chadwick
> wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 04:48:31PM -0700, Xin LI wrote:
> >> On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 4:42 PM, Jeremy Chadwick
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 04:15:56PM -0700, Xin LI
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 5:59 PM, Jeremy Chadwick
wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 04:48:31PM -0700, Xin LI wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 4:42 PM, Jeremy Chadwick
>> wrote:
>> > On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 04:15:56PM -0700, Xin LI wrote:
>> >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> >> Hash: SHA256
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 04:48:31PM -0700, Xin LI wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 4:42 PM, Jeremy Chadwick
> wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 04:15:56PM -0700, Xin LI wrote:
> >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> >> Hash: SHA256
> >>
> >> On 06/10/11 15:15, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> >> > I am hi
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 4:42 PM, Jeremy Chadwick
wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 04:15:56PM -0700, Xin LI wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA256
>>
>> On 06/10/11 15:15, Kevin Oberman wrote:
>> > I am hitting the problem reported some time ago with atkbd and svn
>> > 197392.
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 04:15:56PM -0700, Xin LI wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> On 06/10/11 15:15, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> > I am hitting the problem reported some time ago with atkbd and svn
> > 197392.
> >
> > It's not clear that this has ben finally resolved, but
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 06/10/11 15:15, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> I am hitting the problem reported some time ago with atkbd and svn
> 197392.
>
> It's not clear that this has ben finally resolved, but I am still
> hitting it with -stable on my new T520. I really want to g
I am hitting the problem reported some time ago with atkbd and svn
197392.
It's not clear that this has ben finally resolved, but I am still
hitting it with -stable on my new T520. I really want to get FreeBSD up
on it, but I am dead in the water at this time. I guess I'll have to
build a new kern
06.06.2011 13:53, Martin Matuska написав(ла):
Hi,
I have merged ZFS version 28 to 8-STABLE (revision 222741)
New major features:
- data deduplication
Am I missing something? How about using fletcher[24] for dedup?
--
Sphinx of black quartz judge my vow.
_
On Fri, 10 Jun 2011, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
We tried using dedup on one of our systems, but within 10-15 minutes
turned it off. I believe the added CPU overhead of dedup was causing
the system to act "bursty" in other non-ZFS-related tasks; e.g. turn on
dedup, then in a SSH window hold down the
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 12:53:11PM +0200, Martin Matuska wrote:
> I have merged ZFS version 28 to 8-STABLE (revision 222741)
Follow-up, since we're gradually upgrading our ZFS-based RELENG_8
servers to ZFSv28. Committers/those involved should see my very last
paragraph.
First, server upgrades:
the patch didn't get it.
ugen3.2: at usbus3
urtw0:
on usbus3
urtw0: could not allocate USB transfers, err=USB_ERR_NO_PIPE
device_attach: urtw0 attach returned 6
urtw0:
on usbus3
urtw0: could not allocate USB transfers, err=USB_ERR_NO_PIPE
device_attach: urtw0 attach returned 6
ugen3.2: at
Whoops, ignore the last message, I saw your screen picture.
I have NEVER seen this particular message, I'm wondering if you're getting some
corrupt bits or something. Make sure you have a clean build of the kernel and
driver.
Jack
-Original Message-
From: Jeremy Chadwick [mailto:fre
I looked at the dmesg and I didn't see a panic that was igb related?
What I could see it looked like igb loaded normally, sounds like it's just a
victim of another problem perhaps? You certainly don't want to use it without
MSIX. So far I've seen no data that would help understand this.
Jack
Er, so what if you get rid of ZFS, does your panic go away? It doesn't really
matter what type adapter it is, the igb driver only requests standard size
clusters, so memory is getting trashed somewhere I suspect.
Jack
From: Bartosz Stec [mailto:bartosz.s...@it4pro.pl]
Sent: Friday, June 10, 2
On Fri, 10 Jun 2011 20:05:43 +0300 Mikolaj Golub wrote to Daniel Kalchev:
MG> Could you please try this patch?
MG> http://people.freebsd.org/~trociny/hastd.no_shutdown.patch
Sure you still have to have your kernel patched with uipc_socket.c.patch :-)
--
Mikolaj Golub
___
On Fri, 03 Jun 2011 19:18:29 +0300 Daniel Kalchev wrote:
DK> Well, apparently my HAST joy was short. On a second run, I got stuck with
DK> Jun 3 19:08:16 b1a hastd[1900]: [data2] (primary) Unable to receive
DK> reply header: Operation timed out.
DK> on the primary. No messages on the secon
On 10 June 2011 00:01, Jim Bryant wrote:
> i'm not sure which list this belongs to, so i'm posting to -hackers and
> -stable.
>
> i've noticed for a while now that during heavy activity (for instance
> buildworld), that top will get these kvm_read errors when reading proc
> mem entries.
Hi.
I thi
I have a FreeBSD 8.2 server at home with 4 2TB drives in it running ZFS
in a raidz. Some time ago, I had a disk fail. Initially it wasn't
totally obvious the disk had failed so I ran a 'zpool scrub' on the
pool, which threw up a lot of errors, and also produces a lot of sense
errors, making it obvi
On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 03:43:15PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Thursday, June 09, 2011 11:28:20 am Guido Falsi wrote:
> >
> > I'm having a problem with BTX hanging on an HP 6005 Pro PC.
> >
> > I have filed a followup to an existing PR about this exact problem:
> >
> > http://www.freebsd.org
W dniu 2011-06-10 11:37, Jeremy Chadwick pisze:
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 10:56:06AM +0200, Bartosz Stec wrote:
W dniu 2011-05-13 13:30, Andriy Gapon pisze:
on 12/05/2011 22:43 Bartosz Stec said the following:
Allright, if anyone want to follow:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=156974
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 10:56:06AM +0200, Bartosz Stec wrote:
> W dniu 2011-05-13 13:30, Andriy Gapon pisze:
> >on 12/05/2011 22:43 Bartosz Stec said the following:
> >>Allright, if anyone want to follow:
> >>http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=156974
> >>
> >I suspect that your best course
W dniu 2011-05-13 13:30, Andriy Gapon pisze:
on 12/05/2011 22:43 Bartosz Stec said the following:
Allright, if anyone want to follow:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=156974
I suspect that your best course here is to add some diagnostic printfs in
igb_refresh_mbufs and in m_getzone
On Thursday, June 09, 2011 22:34:18 Jim Bryant wrote:
> I just bought one of those chinese (apparently the same unit relabeled
> and being sold by multiple companies) realtek RTL8187B wifi units. The
> price is right.
>
> The label name on this one is WiFySky 1500mW.
>
> other than the fact th
On Thursday 09 June 2011 22:34:18 Jim Bryant wrote:
> I just bought one of those chinese (apparently the same unit relabeled
> and being sold by multiple companies) realtek RTL8187B wifi units. The
> price is right.
>
> The label name on this one is WiFySky 1500mW.
>
> other than the fact that t
25 matches
Mail list logo
