On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 08:46:48AM +0200, Marin Atanasov wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Using `cu' only works with COM1 for me.
>
> Currently I have two serial ports on the system, and only the first is able
> to make the connection - the serial consoles are enabled in /etc/tty, but as
> I said only COM1 is
Scott Long wrote:
> On Jan 19, 2010, at 9:12 AM, Alexander Motin wrote:
>> I've made a patch, that should solve set of problems of CAM ATA and CAM
>> generally. I would like to ask for testing and feedback.
>>
>> What patch does:
>> - It unifies bus reset/probe sequence. Whenever bus attached at bo
Dear all,
I have no idea why top crashes with segmentation fault on my amd64
machine running FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE-p2.
If someone wants to have a loot at the core dump:
http://www.schmalzbauer.de/downloads/top.core
But I think I should recompile it with DEBUG=-g first, right?
World and kernel ar
Hello,
Using `cu' only works with COM1 for me.
Currently I have two serial ports on the system, and only the first is able
to make the connection - the serial consoles are enabled in /etc/tty, but as
I said only COM1 is able to make the connection.
Regards,
Marin
On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 3:32 PM
On 1/19/10 4:09 PM, Dan Naumov wrote:
On 1/19/2010 12:11 PM, Dan Naumov wrote:
It seems that quite a few BIOSes have serious issues booting off disks
using GPT partitioning when no partition present is marked as
"active". See http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=115406&cat=bin
for a prime
--On Wednesday, January 20, 2010 1:16 AM +0100 "O. Hartmann"
wrote:
This could end in a bad situation, where one process writes a files, say
with some arbitrary stuff and another successing process is intended to
read this file. even if the processes are run serial, those 'delays'
could bre
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 01:44:16PM +0800, wsk wrote:
> folks,
> There is not exist if_bwi.ko module in /boot/kernel under 8.0 Stable why?
Looks like it wasn't hooked up to the build for some reason, no bwi here:
http://svn.freebsd.org/viewvc/base/stable/8/sys/modules/Makefile?revision=202410&vie
于 2010/01/20 02:57, Steven Friedrich 写道:
On Tuesday 19 January 2010 12:44:16 am wsk wrote:
folks,
There is not exist if_bwi.ko module in /boot/kernel under 8.0 Stable
why? ___
freebsd-...@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mail
On 01/19/10 10:09, krad wrote:
2010/1/18 Morgan Wesstr�m
O. Hartmann wrote:
I realise a strange behaviour of several FreeBSD 8.0-STABLE/amd64 boxes.
All boxes have the most recent STABLE. One box is a UP system, two
others SMP boxes, one with a Q6600 4-core, another XEON with 2x 4-cores
(Dell
On 01/18/10 21:34, � wrote:
O. Hartmann wrote:
I realise a strange behaviour of several FreeBSD 8.0-STABLE/amd64 boxes.
All boxes have the most recent STABLE. One box is a UP system, two
others SMP boxes, one with a Q6600 4-core, another XEON with 2x 4-cores
(Dell Poweredge III).
Symptome: All
On 01/12/10 15:31, Guido Falsi wrote:
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 02:30:56PM +0100, Gary Jennejohn wrote:
On Mon, 11 Jan 2010 12:54:48 +0100
ohart...@zedat.fu-berlin.de said:
ohartman> Since friday after the last FreeBSD 8.0-STABLE/amd64 update,
thunderbird3
ohartman> crashes immmediately or af
01/14/10 21:56, Matthew Dillon написав(ла):
This would explain why the performance is not as bad as linux but
is not as good as a properly pipelined case.
For what it may be worth, here are the stats for Solaris as well:
* Solaris 8, native, 32-bit binary (using -lcrypto instead of
On Jan 19, 2010, at 9:12 AM, Alexander Motin wrote:
Hi.
I've made a patch, that should solve set of problems of CAM ATA and
CAM
generally. I would like to ask for testing and feedback.
What patch does:
- It unifies bus reset/probe sequence. Whenever bus attached at boot
or
later, CAM wi
2010/1/19 Daniel O'Connor
> On Tue, 19 Jan 2010, Morgan Wesström wrote:
> > The disks involved don't happen to be Western Digital Green Power
> > disks, do they? The Intelli-Park function in these disks are wrecking
> > havoc with I/O in Linux-land at least, causing massive stalls and
> > iowait
on 19/01/2010 23:09 Dan Naumov said the following:
>> After using gpart to create the GPT (and thus the PMBR and its
>> bootcode), why not simply use "fdisk -a -1 DISKNAME" to set the PMBR
>> partition active?
>
> According to the fdisk output, the partition flag did change from 0 to
> 80. Can the
On 1/19/2010 12:11 PM, Dan Naumov wrote:
> It seems that quite a few BIOSes have serious issues booting off disks
> using GPT partitioning when no partition present is marked as
> "active". See http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=115406&cat=bin
> for a prime example.
>
> In 8.0-RELEASE, usin
On 1/19/2010 12:11 PM, Dan Naumov wrote:
It seems that quite a few BIOSes have serious issues booting off disks
using GPT partitioning when no partition present is marked as
"active". See http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=115406&cat=bin
for a prime example.
In 8.0-RELEASE, using gpart,
Morgan Wesström wrote:
> Garrett Moore wrote:
>> The drives being discussed in my related thread (regarding poor performance)
>> are all WD Green drives. I have used wdidle3 to set all of my drive timeouts
>> to 5 minutes. I'll see what sort of difference this makes for performance.
>>
>> Even if i
On Tuesday 19 January 2010 12:44:16 am wsk wrote:
> folks,
>There is not exist if_bwi.ko module in /boot/kernel under 8.0 Stable
> why? ___
> freebsd-...@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
> To unsubscrib
On Tue, 19 Jan 2010, Gerrit Kühn wrote:
On Tue, 19 Jan 2010 03:24:49 -0800 Jeremy Chadwick
wrote about Re: immense delayed write to file
system (ZFS and UFS2), performance issues:
JC> > JC> If you want a consumer-edition drive that's better tuned for
JC> > JC> server work, you should really be
Hi,
it seems that I'm not experiencing this at all...
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> WD10EACS - WD Caviar Green, 1TB, 16MB, variable rpm
have one (external HDD, "always" powered on)
Model = WDC WD10EAVS-00D7B1
Firmware Version = 01.01A01
Power_On_Hours 5757
Power_Cycle_Count 75
Loa
on 19/01/2010 19:11 Dan Naumov said the following:
> I have found this discussion from about a month ago:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/freebsd-stable@freebsd.org/msg106918.html
> where Robert mentions that "gpart set -a active -i 1" is no longer
> needed in 8-STABLE, because the pmbr will be marke
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 12:36:12PM -0500, jhell wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Jan 2010 10:57, Johan@ wrote:
> >Hello i use the livecd to save an old pc.
> >
> >But when i try to use scp to copy some data to our network i get the
> >message that /usr/bin/ssh could not be found.
>
> This is the same for snaps
On Tue, 19 Jan 2010 10:57, Johan@ wrote:
Hello i use the livecd to save an old pc.
But when i try to use scp to copy some data to our network i get the
message that /usr/bin/ssh could not be found.
This is on 8.0 i386 livecd
This is the same for snapshots of stable/7 livecd too.
--
jhe
Jordi Espasa Clofent wrote:
> I've realized that the nice(1) code hasn't been modified for a long time
> (last code change seems from 4 years ago according the sources).
>
> ¿Is the nice(1) behaviour the expected? I mean, ¿Has been the ULE
> scheduler adapted to nice(1) command or not?
>
It seems that quite a few BIOSes have serious issues booting off disks
using GPT partitioning when no partition present is marked as
"active". See http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=115406&cat=bin
for a prime example.
In 8.0-RELEASE, using gpart, setting a slice as "active" in MBR
partitio
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 11:40:50AM -0500, Garrett Moore wrote:
> I've been watching my memory usage and I have no idea what is consuming
> memory as 'Active'.
>
> Last night I had around 6500MB 'Active' again, 1500MB Wired, no inact, ~30MB
> buf, no free, and ~100MB swap used. My performance copyi
I've been watching my memory usage and I have no idea what is consuming
memory as 'Active'.
Last night I had around 6500MB 'Active' again, 1500MB Wired, no inact, ~30MB
buf, no free, and ~100MB swap used. My performance copying ZFS->ZFS was
again slow (<1MB/s). I tried killing rTorrent and no sign
be found here:
http://people.freebsd.org/~mav/cam-ata.20100119.patch
Feedback as always welcome.
--
Alexander Motin
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to &quo
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 10:44:59AM -0500, Gary Palmer wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 03:24:49AM -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> > WD2001FAAS - WD Caviar Black, 2TB, 64MB, 7200rpm
>
> Do you mean WD2001FASS? I can't find a WD2001FAAS.
Yup, typo -- bound to be at least one given the amount of
Hello i use the livecd to save an old pc.
But when i try to use scp to copy some data to our network i get the
message that /usr/bin/ssh could not be found.
This is on 8.0 i386 livecd
Regards,
Johan Hendriks
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mai
folks,
There is not exist if_bwi.ko module in /boot/kernel under 8.0 Stable why?
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.o
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 03:24:49AM -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> WD2001FAAS - WD Caviar Black, 2TB, 64MB, 7200rpm
Do you mean WD2001FASS? I can't find a WD2001FAAS.
Thanks,
Gary
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org
Emil Mikulic wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 09:16:41AM +0100, Gerrit K?hn wrote:
>> Thanks for bringing up this topic here. I have drives showing up close to
>> 80 load cycle counts here. Guess it's time for that fix... :-|
>
> Device Model: WDC WD10EACS-00ZJB0
> Firmware Version: 01.01B
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 09:16:41AM +0100, Gerrit K?hn wrote:
> Thanks for bringing up this topic here. I have drives showing up close to
> 80 load cycle counts here. Guess it's time for that fix... :-|
Device Model: WDC WD10EACS-00ZJB0
Firmware Version: 01.01B01
Serial Number:WD-WCASxx
On Tue, 19 Jan 2010 03:24:49 -0800 Jeremy Chadwick
wrote about Re: immense delayed write to file
system (ZFS and UFS2), performance issues:
JC> > JC> If you want a consumer-edition drive that's better tuned for
JC> > JC> server work, you should really be looking at the WD Caviar Black
JC> > JC> s
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 11:07:24AM +0100, Gerrit Kühn wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Jan 2010 01:57:36 -0800 Jeremy Chadwick
> wrote about Re: immense delayed write to file
> system (ZFS and UFS2), performance issues:
>
> JC> If you want a consumer-edition drive that's better tuned for server
> JC> work, yo
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> No offence intended by this statement, but: the Green drives are
> specifically intended for workstations. I don't believe in the whole
> "segregation of drive model" thing, but the fact of the matter is, the
> Green drives are variable-RPM and have numerous firmware-level
> Ok then, remove the debugging (WITNESS, INVARIANT*), leave in place
> KDB and DDB, add GDB and try at least to get a coredump when it
> deadlocks.
OK, will do. Am building a KDB/GDB/DDB kenel now.
-pete.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
htt
2010/1/19 Pete French :
>> May you post your kernel config?
>
> sure...
>
> include GENERIC
> ident DEBUG
> options KDB
> options DDB
> options WITNESS
> options INVARIANT_SUPPORT
> options IN
> May you post your kernel config?
sure...
include GENERIC
ident DEBUG
options KDB
options DDB
options WITNESS
options INVARIANT_SUPPORT
options INVARIANTS
That one doesnt lockup, or
On Tue, 19 Jan 2010 01:57:36 -0800 Jeremy Chadwick
wrote about Re: immense delayed write to file
system (ZFS and UFS2), performance issues:
JC> If you want a consumer-edition drive that's better tuned for server
JC> work, you should really be looking at the WD Caviar Black series or
JC> their RE/
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 10:28:58AM +0100, Morgan Wesström wrote:
> Garrett Moore wrote:
> > The drives being discussed in my related thread (regarding poor performance)
> > are all WD Green drives. I have used wdidle3 to set all of my drive timeouts
> > to 5 minutes. I'll see what sort of differenc
Gerrit Kühn wrote:
> Thanks for bringing up this topic here. I have drives showing up close to
> 80 load cycle counts here. Guess it's time for that fix... :-|
>
Just note that the utility is officially for WD's Raid Edition GP drives
and not for the regular consumer models although some user
2010/1/18 Morgan Wesström
> O. Hartmann wrote:
> > I realise a strange behaviour of several FreeBSD 8.0-STABLE/amd64 boxes.
> > All boxes have the most recent STABLE. One box is a UP system, two
> > others SMP boxes, one with a Q6600 4-core, another XEON with 2x 4-cores
> > (Dell Poweredge III).
Garrett Moore wrote:
> The drives being discussed in my related thread (regarding poor performance)
> are all WD Green drives. I have used wdidle3 to set all of my drive timeouts
> to 5 minutes. I'll see what sort of difference this makes for performance.
>
> Even if it makes no difference to perf
On Tue, 19 Jan 2010 10:02:57 +0200 Mikolaj Golub wrote:
> I have found in the Internet that other people have been observed the similar
> problem with FreeBSD6.2 client:
>
> http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=1697
Reading this through carefully it looks like the guy did not experience the
On Mon, 18 Jan 2010 21:41:53 -0500 Garrett Moore
wrote about Re: immense delayed write to file system (ZFS and UFS2),
performance issues:
GM> The drives being discussed in my related thread (regarding poor
GM> performance) are all WD Green drives. I have used wdidle3 to set all
GM> of my drive ti
Hi,
In this thread I have posted to freebsd-fs@ several messages describing our
problem with freebsd7.1 nfs clients. As with the time new info has appeared
and having this all spread in several messages might be a bit confusing, I
want to summarise here what we see and know.
Also I cc to freebsd-
49 matches
Mail list logo
