01/14/10 21:56, Matthew Dillon написав(ла):
This would explain why the performance is not as bad as linux but
is not as good as a properly pipelined case.
For what it may be worth, here are the stats for Solaris as well:
* Solaris 8, native, 32-bit binary (using -lcrypto instead of -lmd):
mmap: 103.54u 27.18s 2:56.46 74.0%
read: 99.12u 40.37s 2:53.06 80.6%
* Solaris 10, native, 32-bit binary (using -lcrypto instead of -lmd):
mmap: 159.36u 83.23s 5:28.25 73.9%
read: 173.50u 104.16s 4:48.30 96.3%
* Solaris 10, using the 32-bit binary built on Solaris-8:
mmap: 217.74u 101.20s 5:58.89 88.8%
All of the "read" results on Solaris (and earlier on Linux) were
obtained from using ``openssl md5 < largefile''.
Seems like BSD is not the only OS, where the mmap's theoretical promise
lags behind the actual offering -- read wins on Solaris overall too,
despite being quite a bit more expensive in sys-time. Would still be
nice to be the first to deliver...
-mi
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
