Re: Cannot rm files when ZFS is full

2009-07-29 Thread grarpamp
Yep, the cp /dev/null works to truncate. So I can deal with it. Yep, everything is snapshotted. Yep, this is a Sun issue not a FreeBSD one. FreeBSD should just stay current with the versions and the minimum needed to port... fbsd dev time is valuable elsewhere. I do remember reading about copy on

Re: Loading ng_socket at runtime?

2009-07-29 Thread Daniel O'Connor
On Thu, 30 Jul 2009, Matthew Fleming wrote: > So, what's the right thing to do? > >  - ignore the warning (usually a bad idea...) >  - load ng_socket on boot >  - compile ng_socket.c into the kernel since it would be loaded on > boot anyways I go for option 1 on -current with bluetooth and it seem

Re: Cannot rm files when ZFS is full

2009-07-29 Thread Andrew Snow
The performance of ZFS is quite bad when the volume is nearly full anyway. I would recommend creating a parent filesystem with a space limit of 90% of the pool size, and then creating your other filesystems under that. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd

Re: portmaster -R (Was: Re: HEADS-UP: Shared Library Versions bumped...)

2009-07-29 Thread Alson van der Meulen
* Doug Barton [2009-07-29 22:10]: > I'm planning to remove the -u option altogether. It actually does very > little now, and certainly does not do what most users expect it should > do. Fine by me. I've never actually used -u, with -d (or the equivalent portmaster.rc setting) it's usually fine fo

Re: portmaster -R (Was: Re: HEADS-UP: Shared Library Versions bumped...)

2009-07-29 Thread Doug Barton
alson...@alm.flutnet.org wrote: > * Doug Barton [2009-07-29 20:48]: >> How about this? When the user has -[rf] but not -R, and there are flag >> files present, ask if they should be cleared before beginning to do >> anything. Otherwise (no -[rf]) ignore them. Sound good? > > Sounds like a good so

Re: portmaster -R (Was: Re: HEADS-UP: Shared Library Versions bumped...)

2009-07-29 Thread alson+ml
* Doug Barton [2009-07-29 20:48]: > How about this? When the user has -[rf] but not -R, and there are flag > files present, ask if they should be cleared before beginning to do > anything. Otherwise (no -[rf]) ignore them. Sound good? Sounds like a good solution for both problems (stale flag file

Re: portmaster -R (Was: Re: HEADS-UP: Shared Library Versions bumped...)

2009-07-29 Thread Doug Barton
Mel Flynn wrote: > On Wednesday 29 July 2009 10:48:33 Doug Barton wrote: >> Alson van der Meulen wrote: >>> * Doug Barton [2009-07-29 18:13]: Mel Flynn wrote: > Gotcha. Is there a reason the flags are removed if the options are not > "-r or -f"? Yes, so we don't have stale flags

Loading ng_socket at runtime?

2009-07-29 Thread Matthew Fleming
I'm doing a migration from releng/6.1 to stable/7, and one of the many new things is that I get a warning when doing things with ng_socket that didn't used to happen. WARNING: attempt to net_add_domain(netgraph) after domainfinalize() The MOD_LOAD code in ng_socket.c is doing a net_add_domain in

Innovative Datalogger with Wireless Communication

2009-07-29 Thread Pablo Villarroya
This is a message in multipart MIME format. Your mail client should not be displaying this. Consider upgrading your mail client to view this message correctly. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freeb

Re: portmaster -R (Was: Re: HEADS-UP: Shared Library Versions bumped...)

2009-07-29 Thread Mel Flynn
On Wednesday 29 July 2009 10:48:33 Doug Barton wrote: > Alson van der Meulen wrote: > > * Doug Barton [2009-07-29 18:13]: > >> Mel Flynn wrote: > >>> Gotcha. Is there a reason the flags are removed if the options are not > >>> "-r or -f"? > >> > >> Yes, so we don't have stale flags sitting around

portmaster -R (Was: Re: HEADS-UP: Shared Library Versions bumped...)

2009-07-29 Thread Doug Barton
Alson van der Meulen wrote: > * Doug Barton [2009-07-29 18:13]: >> Mel Flynn wrote: >>> Gotcha. Is there a reason the flags are removed if the options are not "-r >>> or >>> -f"? >> Yes, so we don't have stale flags sitting around forever to confuse >> future runs. > > I have been bitten by thi

Re: HEADS-UP: Shared Library Versions bumped...

2009-07-29 Thread Alson van der Meulen
* Doug Barton [2009-07-29 18:13]: > Mel Flynn wrote: > > Gotcha. Is there a reason the flags are removed if the options are not "-r > > or > > -f"? > > Yes, so we don't have stale flags sitting around forever to confuse > future runs. I have been bitten by this in the past. A run of portmaster

Re: HEADS-UP: Shared Library Versions bumped...

2009-07-29 Thread Doug Barton
Mel Flynn wrote: > On Tuesday 28 July 2009 23:10:50 Doug Barton wrote: >> Mel Flynn wrote: >>> I wrapped portmaster, since -af has the same problem when something >>> screws the build (mostly plist problems and $me wanting backup packages, >>> but also classics like using sudo as PM_SU_CMD and tryi

Re: Cannot rm files when ZFS is full

2009-07-29 Thread Arnaud Houdelette
Mark Stapper a écrit : Christian Walther wrote: 2009/7/29 grarpamp : One week old build... # df -i . Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Avail Capacity iused ifree %iused Mounted on ram01/mnt1 239465344 239465344 0 100% 13163 0 100% /mnt1 # ls -aliT zero 20797 -rw-r--r-

Re: Cannot rm files when ZFS is full

2009-07-29 Thread Mark Stapper
Christian Walther wrote: > 2009/7/29 grarpamp : > >> One week old build... >> >> # df -i . >> Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Avail Capacity iused ifree %iused Mounted >> on >> ram01/mnt1 239465344 239465344 0 100% 13163 0 100% /mnt1 >> # ls -aliT zero >> 20797 -rw-r--r-- 1 us

Re: Cannot rm files when ZFS is full

2009-07-29 Thread Christian Walther
2009/7/29 grarpamp : > One week old build... > > # df -i . > Filesystem   1K-blocks      Used Avail Capacity iused ifree %iused  Mounted on > ram01/mnt1 239465344 239465344     0   100%   13163     0  100%   /mnt1 > # ls -aliT zero > 20797 -rw-r--r--  1 user user  43515904 Jul 28 23:20:57 2009 zero

Re: HEADS-UP: Shared Library Versions bumped...

2009-07-29 Thread Mel Flynn
On Tuesday 28 July 2009 23:10:50 Doug Barton wrote: > Mel Flynn wrote: > > I wrapped portmaster, since -af has the same problem when something > > screws the build (mostly plist problems and $me wanting backup packages, > > but also classics like using sudo as PM_SU_CMD and trying to reinstall > >

Re: Cannot rm files when ZFS is full

2009-07-29 Thread Ronald Klop
On Wed, 29 Jul 2009 05:29:27 +0200, grarpamp wrote: One week old build... # df -i . Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Avail Capacity iused ifree %iused Mounted on ram01/mnt1 239465344 239465344 0 100% 13163 0 100% /mnt1 # ls -aliT zero 20797 -rw-r--r-- 1 user user 43515904

Re: HEADS-UP: Shared Library Versions bumped...

2009-07-29 Thread Doug Barton
Mel Flynn wrote: > I wrapped portmaster, since -af has the same problem when something screws > the > build (mostly plist problems and $me wanting backup packages, but also > classics like using sudo as PM_SU_CMD and trying to reinstall it). I hate to tell you but portmaster already has the abi