* Doug Barton <do...@freebsd.org> [2009-07-29 22:10]: > I'm planning to remove the -u option altogether. It actually does very > little now, and certainly does not do what most users expect it should > do.
Fine by me. I've never actually used -u, with -d (or the equivalent portmaster.rc setting) it's usually fine for unattended runs. The only annoyance is the question about building interactive ports that don't actually require any interaction (bacula comes to mind), since this is the only question in the config phase that's not cached, but this is probably the port maintainers fault for marking it interactive (it does remind me of "no keyboard present, press F1 to continue"). Alson _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
