> On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 06:42:44PM -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> ...
> > > i see that for 8.x you suggest using fc10, which is also something i
> > > tried on RELENG_7 but had similar symptoms. Is there any known reason
> > > why HEAD and RELENG_7 should be different in terms of linux_base suppor
It happened again, on shutdown.
As the previous time, it happened after a high (for a desktop) uptime and, if
it could matter, after running net-p2p/transmission-gtk2 for several hours.
I don't know if it's related, but often quitting transmission, doesn't
terminate the process. Sometimes it end
On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 08:31:27PM -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> > Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2009 05:13:54 +0200
> > From: Luigi Rizzo
> >
> > On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 06:42:44PM -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> > ...
> > > > i see that for 8.x you suggest using fc10, which is also something i
> > > > tried
> Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2009 05:13:54 +0200
> From: Luigi Rizzo
>
> On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 06:42:44PM -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> ...
> > > i see that for 8.x you suggest using fc10, which is also something i
> > > tried on RELENG_7 but had similar symptoms. Is there any known reason
> > > why HEA
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 04:56:11PM -0400, Mike Edenfield wrote:
> However, after a short period of torrent activity, the machine running
> the firewall becomes extremely slow and lagged for all network traffic,
> but appears to be operating fine locally. Remote connections via ssh
> become e
On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 06:42:44PM -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote:
...
> > i see that for 8.x you suggest using fc10, which is also something i
> > tried on RELENG_7 but had similar symptoms. Is there any known reason
> > why HEAD and RELENG_7 should be different in terms of linux_base support ?
>
> H
> Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2009 13:55:25 +0200
> From: Luigi Rizzo
> Sender: owner-freebsd-sta...@freebsd.org
>
> On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 09:38:05AM +0200, Marc Fonvieille wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 03:35:00AM +0200, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> > > Does anyone know what is the status of flash9 or flash
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jamie Gritton wrote:
> Michael Butler wrote:
>> i...@aaron:/home/imb> sudo jexec 5 tcsh
>> jexec: Unable to parse jail ID.: No such file or directory
>
> The symptom in jexec can be fixed by this little patch:
>
> Index: usr.sbin/jexec/jexec.c
> ===
Michael Butler wrote:
After a clean rebuild ('rm -rf /usr/obj/*') ..
i...@aaron:/home/imb> uname -a
FreeBSD aaron.protected-networks.net 7.2-STABLE FreeBSD 7.2-STABLE #0:
Sat Jul 25 05:39:55 EDT 2009
i...@aaron:/home/imb> jls
JID IP Address Hostname Path
[ .. ]
In article <20090725013500.gc62...@onelab2.iet.unipi.it> you write:
>Does anyone know what is the status of flash9 or flash10 in RELENG_7 ?
>Following the thread of a couple of months ago, i tried to:
>- remove all linux-* ports
>- set the following in /etc/make.conf
> OVERRIDE_LINUX_BASE_POR
On Sat, 25 Jul 2009 17:36:00 +0400
Boris Samorodov wrote:
>
> As for the original question. I don't use flash so can't be very
> helpful here. But there are reports at emulation@ ML that both
> linux-f8-flashplugin10 and linux-f10-flashplugin10 work better
> then flashplugin[7|9].
>
It does not
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
After a clean rebuild ('rm -rf /usr/obj/*') ..
i...@aaron:/home/imb> uname -a
FreeBSD aaron.protected-networks.net 7.2-STABLE FreeBSD 7.2-STABLE #0:
Sat Jul 25 05:39:55 EDT 2009
i...@aaron:/home/imb> jls
JID IP Address Hostname
Marc Fonvieille writes:
> On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 01:55:25PM +0200, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
>> i see that for 8.x you suggest using fc10, which is also something i
>> tried on RELENG_7 but had similar symptoms. Is there any known reason
>> why HEAD and RELENG_7 should be different in terms of linux_ba
Luigi Rizzo writes:
> i see that for 8.x you suggest using fc10
Just FYI: it is a new default for current 8.x.
--
WBR, bsam
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any
aka Peter Much schrieb
mit Datum Wed, 22 Jul 2009 09:51:52 GMT in m2n.fbsd.stable:
|After upgrading my system from 7.2-PRERELEASE to 7.2-STABLE (as
|of last week), and accordingly upgrading my Pools from Version
|6 to Version 13, I get this error when moving arbitrary files
|between different ZFS
On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 01:55:25PM +0200, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 09:38:05AM +0200, Marc Fonvieille wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 03:35:00AM +0200, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> >
> > The Handbook gives a reliable, i.e. reproductible one, recipe:
> > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_
On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 09:38:05AM +0200, Marc Fonvieille wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 03:35:00AM +0200, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> > Does anyone know what is the status of flash9 or flash10 in RELENG_7 ?
> > Following the thread of a couple of months ago, i tried to:
> > - remove all linux-* ports
>
My apologies all,
This was clearly not intended for this list :-)
- Thanks -
- Dave Rivers -
>
> Is there a main() function in your program?
>
> Are you building this for LE operation, or with the Systems/C runtime?
>
> If it's Systems/C, are you using the RENT library (and
On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 09:38:05AM +0200, Marc Fonvieille wrote:
> >
> > Is there a recipe for a working flas9 or flash10 operation ?
> >
>
> The Handbook gives a reliable, i.e. reproductible one, recipe:
> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/desktop-browsers.html
> 6.2.3 Fi
This is stable/7 i386:
$ smartctl -t select,568157535-568159000 /dev/ad10
...
Unrecognized command 13 in ata_command_interface()
Please contact smartmontools-supp...@lists.sourceforge.net
Error Write Selective Self-Test Log failed: Function not implemented
In smartmontools sources this is comman
On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 03:35:00AM +0200, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> Does anyone know what is the status of flash9 or flash10 in RELENG_7 ?
> Following the thread of a couple of months ago, i tried to:
> - remove all linux-* ports
> - set the following in /etc/make.conf
> OVERRIDE_LINUX_BASE_PORT=f
On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 03:35:00AM +0200, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> Does anyone know what is the status of flash9 or flash10 in RELENG_7 ?
> Following the thread of a couple of months ago, i tried to:
> - remove all linux-* ports
> - set the following in /etc/make.conf
> OVERRIDE_LINUX_BASE_PORT=f
22 matches
Mail list logo
