Marc Fonvieille <black...@freebsd.org> writes: > On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 01:55:25PM +0200, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
>> i see that for 8.x you suggest using fc10, which is also something i >> tried on RELENG_7 but had similar symptoms. Is there any known reason >> why HEAD and RELENG_7 should be different in terms of linux_base support ? > > You should ask this question to bsam (CCed) which is our linux_base > expert. There are two cases here. The first one is resolving issue. I'm not sure if all the needed changes were done to RELENG_7 to let resolving work with linux_base-f10. If any linux port/application that uses resolving (i.e. www/linux-firefox) work at RELENG_7 then an MFC has been done. But that issue should not influence flashplugin. The second one (an absence of some syscalls) will not be resolved at RELENG_7 due to an ABI changes. I'm not aware of linux applications affected though. May be it's print/acroread9 but I'm not sure. As for the original question. I don't use flash so can't be very helpful here. But there are reports at emulation@ ML that both linux-f8-flashplugin10 and linux-f10-flashplugin10 work better then flashplugin[7|9]. -- WBR, bsam _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
