On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 10:34:38PM -0400, Alexandre Sunny Kovalenko wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-06-19 at 22:27 +0200, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> > Hi,
> > i am not sure what the situation is but i am starting
> > seeing problems with skype (both 2.0 and 1.2) on a
> > couple of RELENG_7 machines. One of the mac
On Fri, 2009-06-19 at 22:27 +0200, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> Hi,
> i am not sure what the situation is but i am starting
> seeing problems with skype (both 2.0 and 1.2) on a
> couple of RELENG_7 machines. One of the machines still uses
> linux 2.4 emulation and fc4, the other one has 2.6.16 and fc8
> an
At 07:08 PM 6/19/2009, Michael Gass wrote:
I am still confused about the rl driver not working for this
card. The NOTES in /usr/src/sys/conf/NOTES explicitly state
that the rl driver is for the DFE-530TX+ and that the vr
driver is for the DFE-530TX.
The manufacturer could have changed chipse
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 06:08:02PM -0500, Michael Gass wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 12:24:29PM -0500, Michael Gass wrote:
> > I'm running 7.2-stable and I replaced an old ISA NIC with
> > a D-Link DFE-530TX+ card. According to the manual, the
> > correct driver for this card is rl driver. T
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 12:24:29PM -0500, Michael Gass wrote:
> I'm running 7.2-stable and I replaced an old ISA NIC with
> a D-Link DFE-530TX+ card. According to the manual, the
> correct driver for this card is rl driver. The kernel
> insists on using the vr driver which is for the DFE-530TX.
I am seeing problems with FreeBSD 7.0 machines that have the symptoms
described in
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2008-June/043241.html
Can someone please point me to a patch which has a fix for the issue
described in that thread?
Thanks,
-santosh
Hi,
i am not sure what the situation is but i am starting
seeing problems with skype (both 2.0 and 1.2) on a
couple of RELENG_7 machines. One of the machines still uses
linux 2.4 emulation and fc4, the other one has 2.6.16 and fc8
and is a fresh install of 7.2
In both cases, i see that skype remain
> I agree, this shouldn't necessarily be treated as flamebait or trolling.
>
> But shouldn't the question be redirected to the advocacy mailing
> list/team?
Yes. This list is for targeted technical questions. It isn't realistic
to expect a discussion of this nature to stay on-topic.
-Kip
On Fri 19 Jun 2009 at 11:23:26 PDT Michael R. Wayne wrote:
OK, I'm going to take a guess here that English may not be Michal's primary
language and re-ask his question:
Given the several versions of *BSD, I have been led to understand
that each excells in different ways. How do I select wh
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 2:46 PM, Kip Macy wrote:
> Individuals in each of the camps (Free, Open, Net) are frequently
> deeply invested in their platforms of choice to the point where they
> identify with them. In addition, many if not most of us are only
> familiar with one of them. Thus, it isn'
- Original Message -
From: "Mike Tancsa"
To: "Michael Gass" ;
Sent: Friday, June 19, 2009 10:44 AM
Subject: Re: kernel wants the wrong driver for my NIC
: At 01:24 PM 6/19/2009, Michael Gass wrote:
: >I'm running 7.2-stable and I replaced an old ISA NIC with
: >a D-Link DFE-530TX+ ca
On Friday 19 June 2009 1:24:29 pm Michael Gass wrote:
> I'm running 7.2-stable and I replaced an old ISA NIC with
> a D-Link DFE-530TX+ card. According to the manual, the
> correct driver for this card is rl driver. The kernel
> insists on using the vr driver which is for the DFE-530TX.
> >From
Individuals in each of the camps (Free, Open, Net) are frequently
deeply invested in their platforms of choice to the point where they
identify with them. In addition, many if not most of us are only
familiar with one of them. Thus, it isn't really fair to ask us to
compare the three. You will enjo
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 06:23:09AM -0400, STeve Andre' wrote:
> On Friday 19 June 2009 04:47:35 Michal wrote:
> >
> > "Comparing FreeBSD and OpenBSD, FreeBSD is generally better at disk-related
> > I/O whereas OpenBSD handles net-I/O better. No test has been carried out to
> > prove this though."
>
- Original Message -
From: "Michael Gass"
To:
Sent: Friday, June 19, 2009 8:24 PM
Subject: kernel wants the wrong driver for my NIC
I'm running 7.2-stable and I replaced an old ISA NIC with
a D-Link DFE-530TX+ card. According to the manual, the
correct driver for this card is rl
- Original Message -
From: "Ivailo Bonev"
To: "Michael Gass"
Cc:
Sent: Friday, June 19, 2009 8:54 PM
Subject: Re: kernel wants the wrong driver for my NIC
- Original Message -
From: "Michael Gass"
To:
Sent: Friday, June 19, 2009 8:24 PM
Subject: kernel wants the wrong
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 10:24 AM, Michael Gass wrote:
> I'm running 7.2-stable and I replaced an old ISA NIC with
> a D-Link DFE-530TX+ card. According to the manual, the
> correct driver for this card is rl driver. The kernel
> insists on using the vr driver which is for the DFE-530TX.
> >From
At 01:24 PM 6/19/2009, Michael Gass wrote:
I'm running 7.2-stable and I replaced an old ISA NIC with
a D-Link DFE-530TX+ card. According to the manual, the
What does pciconfig -lvc
show ?
---Mike
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing lis
I'm running 7.2-stable and I replaced an old ISA NIC with
a D-Link DFE-530TX+ card. According to the manual, the
correct driver for this card is rl driver. The kernel
insists on using the vr driver which is for the DFE-530TX.
>From what I can tell, the two cards have different chipsets
and so t
John Baldwin wrote:
> What I would like to find out is if there are any 5.x or 6.x binaries that
> use
> libpthread that do not run well with libthr. You can test this by using a
> libmap.conf(5) file to remap libpthread to libthr. For 5.x binaries you will
> want to remap libpthread.so.1 to
All simply rocks...be xBSD... be Linux, be *nix... whatever.. Just use the
right tool for a specific need... We are running Free, Open and Netand
some decent Linux such as Debian, Red Hat among others...Love all of them...
-Mensagem original-
De: owner-freebsd-sta...@freebsd.org
[mail
Michal escreveu:
It wasn't an argument or a versus anything. It was just a question relating
to what he had said and the truth in it and the two OS's being used for
different reasons. That's all. No rage, no debate or looking for any winner!
-Original Message-
From: owner-m...@openbsd.or
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 01:02:40PM +0100, Michal wrote:
> It wasn't an argument or a versus anything. It was just a question relating
> to what he had said and the truth in it and the two OS's being used for
> different reasons. That's all. No rage, no debate or looking for any winner!
To be fair,
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 09:15:05AM CEST, Erwan David said:
> On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 08:56:03AM CEST, Doug Barton said:
> > Ruben de Groot wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 10:34:54AM +0200, Erwan David typed:
> > >> I tried to upgrade my 7.1-RELEASE into 7.2-RELEASE. However
> > >> freebsd-u
Hello,
I'm trying to replace our current firewall (clavister) with freebsd/pf.
I'm almost done but I have some rules I don't know how to convert. I've
tried googling around but I've found nothing useful (maybe I'm looking
for the wrong terms).
I have the following scenario:
LAN (192.168.1.0/
On 19 Jun 2009, at 14:02, Timo Schoeler wrote:
Sure, each one has its own merits over the others and
vice versa.
Above all, they contribute to the genetic diversity in the operating
system pool.
Which is a good thing.
- Ruben
___
freebsd-stabl
thus dem...@thephinix.org spake:
Oh why can't this versus this versus that never dies? There had been
raging debate about which OSes is much better compared to the others since
time immemorial. Sure, each one has its own merits over the others and
vice versa.
Exactly.
So why feeding this iss
Oh why can't this versus this versus that never dies? There had been
raging debate about which OSes is much better compared to the others since
time immemorial. Sure, each one has its own merits over the others and
vice versa. So why feeding this issue up since up to this very moment,
there is no w
It wasn't an argument or a versus anything. It was just a question relating
to what he had said and the truth in it and the two OS's being used for
different reasons. That's all. No rage, no debate or looking for any winner!
-Original Message-
From: owner-m...@openbsd.org [mailto:owner-m..
I agree. Thanks for reminding. I will not reply to this one anymore.
Regards,
Cem
dem...@thephinix.org, 06/19/09 14:41:
Oh why can't this versus this versus that never dies? There had been
raging debate about which OSes is much better compared to the others since
time immemorial. Sure, each o
I have used NetBSD several years on mainly amd64 platform, and these are
+ properties.
- Xen support and boot NetBSD as dom0 and a Linux ie; Ubuntu as domU.
- Clean design of rc.d scripts. Also NetBSD does not automatically
populate rc.d scripts, user adds sample one (displayed after install
and the security is in netbsd:
http://netbsd.gw.com/cgi-bin/man-cgi?security+8+NetBSD-5.0
http://www.netbsd.org/~elad/recent/recent06.pdf
On 6/19/09, Ivan Voras wrote:
> Kim Attree wrote:
>
>> NetBSD runs on just about anything. That's it's primary goal. Since I
>> don't
>> have any weird hard
On Friday 19 June 2009 04:47:35 Michal wrote:
> Someone once said this too me
>
> "Comparing FreeBSD and OpenBSD, FreeBSD is generally better at disk-related
> I/O whereas OpenBSD handles net-I/O better. No test has been carried out to
> prove this though."
>
> Every offence to the person which sai
on 18/06/2009 20:34 Nenhum_de_Nos said the following:
> hail,
>
> I know this was here before,
> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2009-March/004775.html,
> but there was no happy ending there ...
>
> is there any news ?
>
> I have a STABLE from yesterday and the xorg is too muc
Hi,
Well basically, you need to pay for additional security implementations,
and this sometimes costs decrease in performance --- though i think i
can always pay for that...
Regards,
Cem
Kim Attree, 06/19/09 12:16:
You'll struggle to find a proper apples-to-apples test to prove/disprove th
Kim Attree wrote:
NetBSD runs on just about anything. That's it's primary goal. Since I don't
have any weird hardware, I've never had a use for NetBSD.
I don't use NetBSD either but some recent development that come from
that camp are very interesting:
* Journalling UFS ("smart" journalling
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 09:47:35AM +0100, Michal wrote:
> Someone once said this too me
>
> "Comparing FreeBSD and OpenBSD, FreeBSD is generally better at disk-related
> I/O whereas OpenBSD handles net-I/O better. No test has been carried out to
> prove this though."
>
> Every offence to the perso
Someone once said this too me
"Comparing FreeBSD and OpenBSD, FreeBSD is generally better at disk-related
I/O whereas OpenBSD handles net-I/O better. No test has been carried out to
prove this though."
Every offence to the person which said this, but they are not the best admin
ever, though
Somehow I've managed to get ZFS on one of my machines into a state where
it won't reclaim all space after deleting files AND snapshots off of it:
(this is with 7.2-STABLE amd64, compiled June 10)
# ls -la /weird
total 4
drwxr-x--- 2 mysql mysql 2 Jun 19 02:42 .
drwxr-xr-x 29 root wheel
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 08:56:03AM CEST, Doug Barton said:
> Ruben de Groot wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 10:34:54AM +0200, Erwan David typed:
> >>I tried to upgrade my 7.1-RELEASE into 7.2-RELEASE. However
> >> freebsd-update kept asking me to merge every file in /etc whose $Id$
> >> lin
40 matches
Mail list logo
