Michal escreveu:
It wasn't an argument or a versus anything. It was just a question relating
to what he had said and the truth in it and the two OS's being used for
different reasons. That's all. No rage, no debate or looking for any winner!
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-m...@openbsd.org [mailto:owner-m...@openbsd.org] On Behalf Of
dem...@thephinix.org
Sent: 19 June 2009 12:42
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; m...@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: Open Vs Free BSD
Oh why can't this versus this versus that never dies? There had been
raging debate about which OSes is much better compared to the others since
time immemorial. Sure, each one has its own merits over the others and
vice versa. So why feeding this issue up since up to this very moment,
there is no winner.
and the security is in netbsd:
http://netbsd.gw.com/cgi-bin/man-cgi?security+8+NetBSD-5.0
http://www.netbsd.org/~elad/recent/recent06.pdf
On 6/19/09, Ivan Voras <ivo...@freebsd.org> wrote:
Kim Attree wrote:
NetBSD runs on just about anything. That's it's primary goal. Since I
don't
have any weird hardware, I've never had a use for NetBSD.
I don't use NetBSD either but some recent development that come from
that camp are very interesting:
* Journalling UFS ("smart" journalling, not gjournal)
* PUFFS (BSD implementation of FUSE-like system [file system in
userland])
* They had Xen dom0 and domU for years
* They are starting to show decent results in SMP support, including a
new scheduler (a bit similar to ULE); their GENERIC has SMP included
* Possibly superpages, I'm not sure how to parse "Merged amd64 and i386
pmap. Large pages are always used if available"
* I think they are working on their own ZFS port
* They have ported or reimplemented Linux LVM (read+write+admin)
There are of course other things; see for example
http://www.netbsd.org/releases/formal-5/NetBSD-5.0.html
I have a feeling the project has been revitalized in the last few years.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
"freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
The words you chose from the subject to the bottom of your e-mail, were
the wrong ones "Open Vs Free BSD" for me, and for most here, is
literally OpenBSD versus FreeBSD. The answer is: There is winner. The
reason I started using OpenBSD is a very personal one, and it generally
is for most of us here. Even in business the decisions are often made
with the heart. So, you've got to try. I would never use OpenBSD in my
laptop, because it doesn't do everything i need on my laptop. The same
way i would never use ubuntu on my firewall, because it won't do neither.
My 2 cents,
--
Giancarlo Razzolini
http://lock.razzolini.adm.br
Linux User 172199
Red Hat Certified Engineer no:804006389722501
Verify:https://www.redhat.com/certification/rhce/current/
Moleque Sem Conteudo Numero #002
OpenBSD 4.5
Ubuntu 9.04 Jaunty Jackalope
4386 2A6F FFD4 4D5F 5842 6EA0 7ABE BBAB 9C0E 6B85
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
